Development and validation of a measurement instrument for student assessment of quality physical education in Chinese secondary schools.

IF 2.6 3区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
PLoS ONE Pub Date : 2025-06-05 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0324227
Ling Qin, Walter King Yan Ho, Selina Khoo
{"title":"Development and validation of a measurement instrument for student assessment of quality physical education in Chinese secondary schools.","authors":"Ling Qin, Walter King Yan Ho, Selina Khoo","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0324227","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>There is a growing emphasis on developing Quality Physical Education (QPE) programs. However, a research gap exists due to the lack of measurement instruments to assess QPE for students. This study aimed to develop an instrument to assess QPE implementation and its validity and reliability in China. This study comprised three phases. In Phase 1, a conceptual framework for QPE was established using grounded theory based on interviews with 22 PE teachers and 20 students. In Phase 2, using the conceptual framework from Phase 1, we developed an item pool supported by a literature review, expert evaluations, and student interviews. In Phase 3, a cross-sectional study was conducted with secondary school students (705 participants) to analyse the items and assess the instrument's reliability and validity through exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis, as well as test-retest analysis. The final 45-item instrument, comprising four subscales (student, family, school, and community) across 10 factors, demonstrated strong validity and reliability. Model fit indices met established thresholds (e.g., CFI and TLI ≥ .90, as well as RMSEA ≤ .08). The composite reliability and average variance extracted values for each factor exceeded.7 and.5, respectively, with the test-retest reliability also exceeding.7, indicating high reliability and validity. This study addresses a critical methodological gap in QPE research by developing a culturally contextualized assessment instrument that explicitly identifies and measures students' perceptions of QPE implementation. This instrument enables systematic monitoring of QPE practices from students' perspectives, informing evidence-based policymaking and resource allocation. Integrating student, family, school, and community subscales supports holistic interventions to improve the quality of PE.</p>","PeriodicalId":20189,"journal":{"name":"PLoS ONE","volume":"20 6","pages":"e0324227"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12140257/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLoS ONE","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0324227","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There is a growing emphasis on developing Quality Physical Education (QPE) programs. However, a research gap exists due to the lack of measurement instruments to assess QPE for students. This study aimed to develop an instrument to assess QPE implementation and its validity and reliability in China. This study comprised three phases. In Phase 1, a conceptual framework for QPE was established using grounded theory based on interviews with 22 PE teachers and 20 students. In Phase 2, using the conceptual framework from Phase 1, we developed an item pool supported by a literature review, expert evaluations, and student interviews. In Phase 3, a cross-sectional study was conducted with secondary school students (705 participants) to analyse the items and assess the instrument's reliability and validity through exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis, as well as test-retest analysis. The final 45-item instrument, comprising four subscales (student, family, school, and community) across 10 factors, demonstrated strong validity and reliability. Model fit indices met established thresholds (e.g., CFI and TLI ≥ .90, as well as RMSEA ≤ .08). The composite reliability and average variance extracted values for each factor exceeded.7 and.5, respectively, with the test-retest reliability also exceeding.7, indicating high reliability and validity. This study addresses a critical methodological gap in QPE research by developing a culturally contextualized assessment instrument that explicitly identifies and measures students' perceptions of QPE implementation. This instrument enables systematic monitoring of QPE practices from students' perspectives, informing evidence-based policymaking and resource allocation. Integrating student, family, school, and community subscales supports holistic interventions to improve the quality of PE.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

中国中学学生体育素质评价测量工具的研制与验证。
人们越来越重视发展优质体育教育(QPE)项目。然而,由于缺乏评估学生QPE的测量工具,研究存在空白。本研究旨在开发一种工具来评估QPE在中国的实施及其效度和信度。本研究分为三个阶段。在第一阶段,基于对22名体育教师和20名学生的访谈,运用扎根理论建立了QPE的概念框架。在第二阶段,使用第一阶段的概念框架,我们开发了一个由文献综述、专家评估和学生访谈支持的项目库。在第三阶段,我们对705名中学生进行了横断面研究,通过探索性和验证性因素分析以及重测分析来分析项目和评估工具的信度和效度。最后的45项工具,包括四个子量表(学生、家庭、学校和社区),跨越10个因素,显示出很强的效度和信度。模型拟合指标满足既定阈值(如CFI和TLI≥)。90, RMSEA≤.08)。各因子的综合信度和平均方差均超过提取值。7,。5,分别与重测信度也超过。7、表明信度和效度高。本研究通过开发一种文化情境化的评估工具,明确识别和测量学生对QPE实施的看法,解决了QPE研究中一个关键的方法差距。该工具能够从学生的角度系统地监测QPE实践,为基于证据的政策制定和资源分配提供信息。整合学生、家庭、学校和社区的子量表支持整体干预以提高体育质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
PLoS ONE
PLoS ONE 生物-生物学
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
5.40%
发文量
14242
审稿时长
3.7 months
期刊介绍: PLOS ONE is an international, peer-reviewed, open-access, online publication. PLOS ONE welcomes reports on primary research from any scientific discipline. It provides: * Open-access—freely accessible online, authors retain copyright * Fast publication times * Peer review by expert, practicing researchers * Post-publication tools to indicate quality and impact * Community-based dialogue on articles * Worldwide media coverage
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信