{"title":"Role of Superficial Thoracoepigastric Vein in Delay Procedure of Deep Inferior Epigastric Artery Perforator Flap.","authors":"Sara L Ma, Mihaela-Elena Rapolti","doi":"10.1097/GOX.0000000000006851","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flaps are the current gold standard for autologous breast reconstruction. A delay technique for single-perforator DIEP flap reconstruction had been previously described to improve tissue transfer reliability. However, the importance of the thoracoepigastric system in this procedure is unknown. We describe a case of 2-stage bilateral DIEP flap breast reconstruction in a 49-year-old obese woman, wherein unilateral (left) interruption of the thoracoepigastric vein during stage 1 delay unexpectedly yielded markedly improved outcomes compared with the opposing (right) side with an intact thoracoepigastric vein. Slight transient venous congestion was noticed immediately in the left hemiabdomen after interruption of the ipsilateral thoracoepigastric vein concomitant with ligation of the superficial inferior epigastric vein, venae comitantes of the superficial inferior epigastric artery, and superior epigastric veins. The left hemiabdominal DIEP flap was uneventfully harvested and transferred 3 weeks later. On the right side with an intact thoracoepigastric system, complete elevation of the hemiabdomen tissue during stage 2 resulted in extensive venous congestion in situ, which improved after an intraflap anastomosis between the dilated stump of the right superficial inferior epigastric vein and a branch of the right deep inferior epigastric vein. Preservation of the thoracoepigastric system as part of the previously described DIEP delay protocol may cause insufficient flap delay, as the intact superficial system prevents maturation of venous drainage through the pedicle pathway. We propose thoracoepigastric vein interruption as a critical step in optimizing the delay of DIEP flap reliability, particularly in patients with dominant superficial venous systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":20149,"journal":{"name":"Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open","volume":"13 6","pages":"e6851"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12140703/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000006851","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flaps are the current gold standard for autologous breast reconstruction. A delay technique for single-perforator DIEP flap reconstruction had been previously described to improve tissue transfer reliability. However, the importance of the thoracoepigastric system in this procedure is unknown. We describe a case of 2-stage bilateral DIEP flap breast reconstruction in a 49-year-old obese woman, wherein unilateral (left) interruption of the thoracoepigastric vein during stage 1 delay unexpectedly yielded markedly improved outcomes compared with the opposing (right) side with an intact thoracoepigastric vein. Slight transient venous congestion was noticed immediately in the left hemiabdomen after interruption of the ipsilateral thoracoepigastric vein concomitant with ligation of the superficial inferior epigastric vein, venae comitantes of the superficial inferior epigastric artery, and superior epigastric veins. The left hemiabdominal DIEP flap was uneventfully harvested and transferred 3 weeks later. On the right side with an intact thoracoepigastric system, complete elevation of the hemiabdomen tissue during stage 2 resulted in extensive venous congestion in situ, which improved after an intraflap anastomosis between the dilated stump of the right superficial inferior epigastric vein and a branch of the right deep inferior epigastric vein. Preservation of the thoracoepigastric system as part of the previously described DIEP delay protocol may cause insufficient flap delay, as the intact superficial system prevents maturation of venous drainage through the pedicle pathway. We propose thoracoepigastric vein interruption as a critical step in optimizing the delay of DIEP flap reliability, particularly in patients with dominant superficial venous systems.
期刊介绍:
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open is an open access, peer reviewed, international journal focusing on global plastic and reconstructive surgery.Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open publishes on all areas of plastic and reconstructive surgery, including basic science/experimental studies pertinent to the field and also clinical articles on such topics as: breast reconstruction, head and neck surgery, pediatric and craniofacial surgery, hand and microsurgery, wound healing, and cosmetic and aesthetic surgery. Clinical studies, experimental articles, ideas and innovations, and techniques and case reports are all welcome article types. Manuscript submission is open to all surgeons, researchers, and other health care providers world-wide who wish to communicate their research results on topics related to plastic and reconstructive surgery. Furthermore, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open, a complimentary journal to Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, provides an open access venue for the publication of those research studies sponsored by private and public funding agencies that require open access publication of study results. Its mission is to disseminate high quality, peer reviewed research in plastic and reconstructive surgery to the widest possible global audience, through an open access platform. As an open access journal, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open offers its content for free to any viewer. Authors of articles retain their copyright to the materials published. Additionally, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open provides rapid review and publication of accepted papers.