Late-onset Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae Sepsis Among Very Preterm Infants: A Multicenter Study in China.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 IMMUNOLOGY
Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal Pub Date : 2025-11-01 Epub Date: 2025-06-03 DOI:10.1097/INF.0000000000004891
Shujuan Li, Weiyin Yu, Jinglin Chen, Long Li, Xiuying Tian, Shoo K Lee, Yun Cao, Yongyan Shi, Siyuan Jiang
{"title":"Late-onset Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae Sepsis Among Very Preterm Infants: A Multicenter Study in China.","authors":"Shujuan Li, Weiyin Yu, Jinglin Chen, Long Li, Xiuying Tian, Shoo K Lee, Yun Cao, Yongyan Shi, Siyuan Jiang","doi":"10.1097/INF.0000000000004891","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) infections are emerging as a crisis in developing countries. We aim to investigate the epidemiologic characteristics and antibiotic treatment strategies of CRE sepsis in very preterm infants (VPIs).</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This cross-sectional study included all infants born at 24-31 weeks of gestation or birth weight <1500 g who developed late-onset sepsis caused by Enterobacteriaceae , as recorded in the 2022 Chinese Neonatal Network database. Late-onset sepsis was defined as sepsis occurring after 72 hours of birth.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 11,447 VPIs admitted, 205 infants had 207 episodes of Enterobacteriaceae -related late-onset sepsis, of which 27 (13.0%) were caused by CRE. The most common CRE pathogens were Klebsiella spp. (66.7%, 18/27). Multivariate analysis identified prior carbapenem exposure as an independent risk factor for CRE sepsis (adjusted odds ratio: 2.33; 95% confidence interval: 1.02-5.49). In the CRE group, mortality due to Enterobacteriaceae sepsis (22.2% vs. 10.1%, P = 0.07) and all-cause mortality during hospitalization (29.6% vs. 13.5%, P = 0.04) were both higher than that in the non-CRE group. For empirical antibiotic therapy, of the 27 CRE cases, 21 (77.8%) were treated with meropenem alone and 6 (28.6%) of these infants died from CRE sepsis. For definitive therapy, 17/22 (77.3%) received monotherapy, of which 12 (70.6%) were treated with meropenem, while 5 (22.7%) received combination therapy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In Chinese neonatal intensive care units, 13.0% of late-onset Enterobacteriaceae sepsis in VPIs was caused by CRE, which was associated with a significant mortality rate. Meropenem-based regimens remain the primary treatment for CRE sepsis, though with a high treatment failure rate.</p>","PeriodicalId":19858,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal","volume":" ","pages":"e394-e399"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/INF.0000000000004891","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) infections are emerging as a crisis in developing countries. We aim to investigate the epidemiologic characteristics and antibiotic treatment strategies of CRE sepsis in very preterm infants (VPIs).

Method: This cross-sectional study included all infants born at 24-31 weeks of gestation or birth weight <1500 g who developed late-onset sepsis caused by Enterobacteriaceae , as recorded in the 2022 Chinese Neonatal Network database. Late-onset sepsis was defined as sepsis occurring after 72 hours of birth.

Results: Of 11,447 VPIs admitted, 205 infants had 207 episodes of Enterobacteriaceae -related late-onset sepsis, of which 27 (13.0%) were caused by CRE. The most common CRE pathogens were Klebsiella spp. (66.7%, 18/27). Multivariate analysis identified prior carbapenem exposure as an independent risk factor for CRE sepsis (adjusted odds ratio: 2.33; 95% confidence interval: 1.02-5.49). In the CRE group, mortality due to Enterobacteriaceae sepsis (22.2% vs. 10.1%, P = 0.07) and all-cause mortality during hospitalization (29.6% vs. 13.5%, P = 0.04) were both higher than that in the non-CRE group. For empirical antibiotic therapy, of the 27 CRE cases, 21 (77.8%) were treated with meropenem alone and 6 (28.6%) of these infants died from CRE sepsis. For definitive therapy, 17/22 (77.3%) received monotherapy, of which 12 (70.6%) were treated with meropenem, while 5 (22.7%) received combination therapy.

Conclusions: In Chinese neonatal intensive care units, 13.0% of late-onset Enterobacteriaceae sepsis in VPIs was caused by CRE, which was associated with a significant mortality rate. Meropenem-based regimens remain the primary treatment for CRE sepsis, though with a high treatment failure rate.

中国早产儿迟发性耐碳青霉烯肠杆菌科败血症:一项多中心研究。
背景:碳青霉烯耐药肠杆菌科(CRE)感染正在发展中国家成为一种危机。我们旨在探讨极早产儿CRE败血症的流行病学特征和抗生素治疗策略。方法:这项横断面研究纳入了所有出生在24-31周妊娠或出生体重的婴儿。结果:在11447名vpi患者中,205名婴儿有207次肠杆菌相关晚发型脓毒症发作,其中27例(13.0%)是由CRE引起的。最常见的CRE病原菌为克雷伯氏菌(Klebsiella spp)(66.7%, 18/27)。多因素分析发现,既往碳青霉烯暴露是CRE败血症的独立危险因素(校正优势比:2.33;95%置信区间:1.02-5.49)。CRE组肠杆菌科败血症死亡率(22.2%比10.1%,P = 0.07)和住院期间全因死亡率(29.6%比13.5%,P = 0.04)均高于非CRE组。对于经验性抗生素治疗,27例CRE病例中,21例(77.8%)单独使用美罗培南治疗,其中6例(28.6%)死于CRE败血症。对于最终治疗,17/22(77.3%)接受单一治疗,其中12(70.6%)接受美罗培南治疗,5(22.7%)接受联合治疗。结论:在中国新生儿重症监护病房,13.0%的VPIs迟发性肠杆菌科脓毒症是由CRE引起的,其死亡率显著相关。以美罗培尼为基础的方案仍然是CRE败血症的主要治疗方法,尽管治疗失败率很高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
2.80%
发文量
566
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: ​​The Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal® (PIDJ) is a complete, up-to-the-minute resource on infectious diseases in children. Through a mix of original studies, informative review articles, and unique case reports, PIDJ delivers the latest insights on combating disease in children — from state-of-the-art diagnostic techniques to the most effective drug therapies and other treatment protocols. It is a resource that can improve patient care and stimulate your personal research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信