Virtual Reality in Neonatal Ductal Stenting: A New Era in Preprocedural Planning for Ductus Arteriosus Stenting in Complex Congenital Heart Defects with Duct-Dependent Pulmonary Circulation.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Judyta Szeliga, Karolina Cabaj-Włodarczyk, Sebastian Góreczny
{"title":"Virtual Reality in Neonatal Ductal Stenting: A New Era in Preprocedural Planning for Ductus Arteriosus Stenting in Complex Congenital Heart Defects with Duct-Dependent Pulmonary Circulation.","authors":"Judyta Szeliga, Karolina Cabaj-Włodarczyk, Sebastian Góreczny","doi":"10.1007/s00246-025-03908-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Ductus arteriosus (DA) stenting is a well-established interventional alternative to surgical systemic-to-pulmonary shunts in neonates with congenital heart defects and ductal-dependent pulmonary circulation (DDPC). While it avoids sternotomy and cardiopulmonary bypass, the procedure remains technically demanding, especially in cases involving tortuous or misaligned ductal anatomy. Such anatomical complexity is associated with increased procedural difficulty and a higher rate of reinterventions. Although echocardiography, computed tomography (CT), and angiography remain key imaging modalities, they may be limited in providing comprehensive spatial context. Virtual reality (VR) has recently emerged as a promising tool that enables interactive 3D visualisation of cardiovascular structures and may enhance preprocedural assessment. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and potential benefits of CT-derived VR-based 3D modelling for preprocedural planning in neonates undergoing DA stenting for DDPC. The study compared VR-derived anatomical and procedural assessments with conventional angiographic imaging. Between March 2021 and August 2023, six neonates with DDPC underwent preprocedural contrast-enhanced CT and were included in this single-centre retrospective study. Three additional patients referred for DA stenting without CT were excluded. Dedicated VR software (VMersive, Poland) was used to automatically generate interactive 3D models from CT datasets without manual segmentation. The models were evaluated using immersive VR headsets and controller-based tools for precise anatomical assessment. DA morphology, tortuosity classification, total ductal length [L1], straight-line distance [L2], curvature index (CI), optimal fluoroscopic projection, and vascular access were analysed in VR and compared with angiographic data. Paired t-tests were used for statistical comparison, with significance set at p < 0.05. All six VR models were successfully created in under 5 min. Morphological and tortuosity classification: VR-based assessments were consistent with angiographic classification (Type I-III), confirming reliability. Length and curvature: VR-derived [L1] values were significantly longer than angiographic measurements (mean: 28.93 mm vs. 24.14 mm; p = 0.038). Curvature index was significantly higher in VR (mean: 0.46 vs. 0.29; p < 0.001), especially in Type III ducts, suggesting that angiography underestimates vascular tortuosity. Projection planning: Median angular deviation between VR-recommended and final procedural projections was 12° (range: 6-30°, p = 0.259). In cases requiring multiple contrast injections, final projections closely matched VR suggestions, indicating VR's potential to reduce radiation exposure and procedural time. Vascular access: VR-predicted access matched initial operator choice in 3/6 cases (50%), rising to 5/6 (83%) when reinterventions were included. Adjacent structures: VR allowed simultaneous visualisation of DA and adjacent thoracic structures. In patients with anomalous pulmonary venous return, VR clarified spatial relationships and potential compression risk. Additionally, in one case, a persistent vertical vein was identified, guiding a rare, combined intervention strategy. VR-based 3D modelling from CT data are a feasible and effective tool for preprocedural planning in DA stenting. It provides accurate spatial insight into ductal anatomy, curvature, projection alignment, and access routes. VR enhances anatomical understanding, supports multidisciplinary planning, and may reduce procedural uncertainty, particularly in complex neonatal interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":19814,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Cardiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00246-025-03908-3","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Ductus arteriosus (DA) stenting is a well-established interventional alternative to surgical systemic-to-pulmonary shunts in neonates with congenital heart defects and ductal-dependent pulmonary circulation (DDPC). While it avoids sternotomy and cardiopulmonary bypass, the procedure remains technically demanding, especially in cases involving tortuous or misaligned ductal anatomy. Such anatomical complexity is associated with increased procedural difficulty and a higher rate of reinterventions. Although echocardiography, computed tomography (CT), and angiography remain key imaging modalities, they may be limited in providing comprehensive spatial context. Virtual reality (VR) has recently emerged as a promising tool that enables interactive 3D visualisation of cardiovascular structures and may enhance preprocedural assessment. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and potential benefits of CT-derived VR-based 3D modelling for preprocedural planning in neonates undergoing DA stenting for DDPC. The study compared VR-derived anatomical and procedural assessments with conventional angiographic imaging. Between March 2021 and August 2023, six neonates with DDPC underwent preprocedural contrast-enhanced CT and were included in this single-centre retrospective study. Three additional patients referred for DA stenting without CT were excluded. Dedicated VR software (VMersive, Poland) was used to automatically generate interactive 3D models from CT datasets without manual segmentation. The models were evaluated using immersive VR headsets and controller-based tools for precise anatomical assessment. DA morphology, tortuosity classification, total ductal length [L1], straight-line distance [L2], curvature index (CI), optimal fluoroscopic projection, and vascular access were analysed in VR and compared with angiographic data. Paired t-tests were used for statistical comparison, with significance set at p < 0.05. All six VR models were successfully created in under 5 min. Morphological and tortuosity classification: VR-based assessments were consistent with angiographic classification (Type I-III), confirming reliability. Length and curvature: VR-derived [L1] values were significantly longer than angiographic measurements (mean: 28.93 mm vs. 24.14 mm; p = 0.038). Curvature index was significantly higher in VR (mean: 0.46 vs. 0.29; p < 0.001), especially in Type III ducts, suggesting that angiography underestimates vascular tortuosity. Projection planning: Median angular deviation between VR-recommended and final procedural projections was 12° (range: 6-30°, p = 0.259). In cases requiring multiple contrast injections, final projections closely matched VR suggestions, indicating VR's potential to reduce radiation exposure and procedural time. Vascular access: VR-predicted access matched initial operator choice in 3/6 cases (50%), rising to 5/6 (83%) when reinterventions were included. Adjacent structures: VR allowed simultaneous visualisation of DA and adjacent thoracic structures. In patients with anomalous pulmonary venous return, VR clarified spatial relationships and potential compression risk. Additionally, in one case, a persistent vertical vein was identified, guiding a rare, combined intervention strategy. VR-based 3D modelling from CT data are a feasible and effective tool for preprocedural planning in DA stenting. It provides accurate spatial insight into ductal anatomy, curvature, projection alignment, and access routes. VR enhances anatomical understanding, supports multidisciplinary planning, and may reduce procedural uncertainty, particularly in complex neonatal interventions.

新生儿导管支架植入术中的虚拟现实技术:导管依赖肺循环的复杂先天性心脏缺损动脉导管支架植入术前规划的新时代。
对于先天性心脏缺陷和导管依赖性肺循环(DDPC)的新生儿,动脉导管(DA)支架置入术是一种成熟的介入替代手术系统-肺分流术。虽然它避免了胸骨切开术和体外循环,但该手术在技术上仍然要求很高,特别是在涉及导管解剖扭曲或错位的情况下。这种解剖复杂性与手术难度增加和再介入率升高有关。尽管超声心动图、计算机断层扫描(CT)和血管造影仍然是主要的成像方式,但它们在提供全面的空间背景方面可能受到限制。虚拟现实(VR)最近成为一种很有前途的工具,可以实现心血管结构的交互式3D可视化,并可以增强手术前评估。本研究旨在评估ct衍生的基于vr的3D建模在新生儿DDPC DA支架置入术前规划中的可行性和潜在益处。该研究比较了vr衍生的解剖和程序评估与传统血管造影成像。在2021年3月至2023年8月期间,6名患有DDPC的新生儿接受了术前对比增强CT检查,并纳入了这项单中心回顾性研究。另外3例未行CT的DA支架置入患者被排除在外。使用专用的VR软件(VMersive,波兰)从CT数据集自动生成交互式3D模型,无需手动分割。使用沉浸式VR头显和基于控制器的工具对模型进行评估,以进行精确的解剖评估。在VR中分析DA形态、弯曲度分类、导管总长度[L1]、直线距离[L2]、曲率指数(CI)、最佳透视投影和血管通路,并与血管造影数据进行比较。采用配对t检验进行统计学比较,显著性设为p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pediatric Cardiology
Pediatric Cardiology 医学-小儿科
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
258
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: The editor of Pediatric Cardiology welcomes original manuscripts concerning all aspects of heart disease in infants, children, and adolescents, including embryology and anatomy, physiology and pharmacology, biochemistry, pathology, genetics, radiology, clinical aspects, investigative cardiology, electrophysiology and echocardiography, and cardiac surgery. Articles which may include original articles, review articles, letters to the editor etc., must be written in English and must be submitted solely to Pediatric Cardiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信