Patient Adherence and the Serum Phosphate, Calcium, and Intact Parathyroid Hormone Control in Peritoneal Dialysis Patients: Effectiveness of Smart PD Care Program.

IF 3.2 4区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Kidney Diseases Pub Date : 2025-04-23 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1159/000545964
Yan Yang, Li Fan, Binbin Lu, Yuanhui Qiu, Zhenhu Chen, Jie Li, Yilin Zeng, Lili Deng, Zhiming Ye, Xueqing Yu
{"title":"Patient Adherence and the Serum Phosphate, Calcium, and Intact Parathyroid Hormone Control in Peritoneal Dialysis Patients: Effectiveness of Smart PD Care Program.","authors":"Yan Yang, Li Fan, Binbin Lu, Yuanhui Qiu, Zhenhu Chen, Jie Li, Yilin Zeng, Lili Deng, Zhiming Ye, Xueqing Yu","doi":"10.1159/000545964","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Patient adherence is important for long-term outcomes of peritoneal dialysis (PD). Artificial intelligence is a good tool to manage patients. However, there are limited data regarding its impact on the patient adherence and the effect of patient adherence on serum phosphate, calcium, and intact parathyroid hormone (iPTH) control in PD patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a single-center, prospective cohort study including PD patients in Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital. Adult patients (age ≥18 years) who were included in the smart PD care program from September 1, 2020, to April 31, 2023, were enrolled. Patient adherence was assessed using the patient-reported daily PD prescription data and calculated as the total days with PD ultrafiltration reported divided by the total days of follow-up. Good adherence was defined as the reporting rate ≥80%. The primary outcome was serum phosphate, calcium, and iPTH values achieved the treatment targets at 12-month follow-up. Unadjusted and adjusted generalized estimating equations were used to evaluate the association of patient adherence with the serum phosphorus, serum calcium, and iPTH control.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 267 patients were included in this study. The mean age of the whole cohort was 43.3 ± 12.8 years, 130 (48.7%) were females, and 52 (19.5%) had diabetes. Patient adherence improved after being included in the smart PD care program and the overall patient adherence during 12-month follow-up was 77.1% ± 26.4%, 93.0% ± 7.4%, and 50.9% ± 25.6% for the entire cohort, patients with good adherence, and those with poor adherence, respectively. Compared to patients with poor adherence, those with good adherence were associated with a better serum calcium (adjusted OR: 3.76; 95% CI: 2.67-5.30; <i>p</i> < 0.001) and iPTH control (adjusted OR: 2.20; 95% CI: 1.56-3.11; <i>p</i> < 0.001) but not for serum phosphorus control (adjusted OR: 1.31; 95% CI: 0.89-1.91; <i>p</i> = 0.17) after being adjusted for potential confounders. Results were similar when assessing the relationship between patient adherence and the longitudinal changes of serum calcium, iPTH, and phosphorus during follow-up.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Smart PD care program was effective in improving patient adherence. Good patient adherence was associated with better serum calcium and iPTH control but not for phosphorus control in PD patients. Further studies should be done to evaluate the effect of the smart PD care program on long-term patient outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":17830,"journal":{"name":"Kidney Diseases","volume":"11 1","pages":"356-364"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12140603/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kidney Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000545964","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Patient adherence is important for long-term outcomes of peritoneal dialysis (PD). Artificial intelligence is a good tool to manage patients. However, there are limited data regarding its impact on the patient adherence and the effect of patient adherence on serum phosphate, calcium, and intact parathyroid hormone (iPTH) control in PD patients.

Methods: This was a single-center, prospective cohort study including PD patients in Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital. Adult patients (age ≥18 years) who were included in the smart PD care program from September 1, 2020, to April 31, 2023, were enrolled. Patient adherence was assessed using the patient-reported daily PD prescription data and calculated as the total days with PD ultrafiltration reported divided by the total days of follow-up. Good adherence was defined as the reporting rate ≥80%. The primary outcome was serum phosphate, calcium, and iPTH values achieved the treatment targets at 12-month follow-up. Unadjusted and adjusted generalized estimating equations were used to evaluate the association of patient adherence with the serum phosphorus, serum calcium, and iPTH control.

Results: A total of 267 patients were included in this study. The mean age of the whole cohort was 43.3 ± 12.8 years, 130 (48.7%) were females, and 52 (19.5%) had diabetes. Patient adherence improved after being included in the smart PD care program and the overall patient adherence during 12-month follow-up was 77.1% ± 26.4%, 93.0% ± 7.4%, and 50.9% ± 25.6% for the entire cohort, patients with good adherence, and those with poor adherence, respectively. Compared to patients with poor adherence, those with good adherence were associated with a better serum calcium (adjusted OR: 3.76; 95% CI: 2.67-5.30; p < 0.001) and iPTH control (adjusted OR: 2.20; 95% CI: 1.56-3.11; p < 0.001) but not for serum phosphorus control (adjusted OR: 1.31; 95% CI: 0.89-1.91; p = 0.17) after being adjusted for potential confounders. Results were similar when assessing the relationship between patient adherence and the longitudinal changes of serum calcium, iPTH, and phosphorus during follow-up.

Conclusions: Smart PD care program was effective in improving patient adherence. Good patient adherence was associated with better serum calcium and iPTH control but not for phosphorus control in PD patients. Further studies should be done to evaluate the effect of the smart PD care program on long-term patient outcomes.

患者依从性和腹膜透析患者的血清磷酸盐、钙和完整甲状旁腺激素控制:智能PD护理计划的有效性。
患者依从性对腹膜透析(PD)的长期预后很重要。人工智能是管理病人的好工具。然而,关于其对患者依从性的影响以及患者依从性对PD患者血清磷酸盐、钙和完整甲状旁腺激素(iPTH)控制的影响,数据有限。方法:采用单中心、前瞻性队列研究,纳入广东省人民医院PD患者。纳入2020年9月1日至2023年4月31日纳入智能PD护理计划的成年患者(年龄≥18岁)。使用患者报告的每日PD处方数据评估患者依从性,并计算为报告PD超滤的总天数除以随访总天数。依从性好定义为报告率≥80%。主要终点是12个月随访时血清磷酸盐、钙和iPTH值达到治疗目标。使用未调整和调整的广义估计方程来评估患者依从性与血清磷、血清钙和iPTH控制的关系。结果:本研究共纳入267例患者。整个队列的平均年龄为43.3±12.8岁,女性130人(48.7%),糖尿病患者52人(19.5%)。纳入智能PD护理项目后,患者的依从性得到改善,在12个月的随访期间,整个队列、依从性良好的患者和依从性较差的患者的总体依从性分别为77.1%±26.4%、93.0%±7.4%和50.9%±25.6%。与依从性差的患者相比,依从性好的患者血清钙水平更高(调整OR: 3.76;95% ci: 2.67-5.30;p < 0.001)和iPTH对照(调整OR: 2.20;95% ci: 1.56-3.11;p < 0.001),但血清磷对照没有(校正OR: 1.31;95% ci: 0.89-1.91;P = 0.17),排除了潜在的混杂因素。在评估患者依从性与随访期间血清钙、iPTH和磷的纵向变化之间的关系时,结果相似。结论:智能PD护理方案可有效提高患者依从性。良好的患者依从性与PD患者更好的血清钙和iPTH控制相关,但与磷控制无关。应该做进一步的研究来评估智能PD护理计划对患者长期预后的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Kidney Diseases
Kidney Diseases UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
2.70%
发文量
33
审稿时长
27 weeks
期刊介绍: ''Kidney Diseases'' aims to provide a platform for Asian and Western research to further and support communication and exchange of knowledge. Review articles cover the most recent clinical and basic science relevant to the entire field of nephrological disorders, including glomerular diseases, acute and chronic kidney injury, tubulo-interstitial disease, hypertension and metabolism-related disorders, end-stage renal disease, and genetic kidney disease. Special articles are prepared by two authors, one from East and one from West, which compare genetics, epidemiology, diagnosis methods, and treatment options of a disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信