Natasha B Leighl, Luis Paz-Ares, Delvys Rodriguez Abreu, Rina Hui, Sofia Baka, Frédéric Bigot, Makoto Nishio, Alexey Smolin, Samreen Ahmed, Adam J Schoenfeld, Sameh Daher, Diego L Cortinovis, Vincenzo Di Noia, Helena Linardou, Justin F Gainor, Corina Dutcus, Chinyere E Okpara, Xuan Deng, Debra Kush, Ashwini Arunachalam, Andrew Song, Byoung Chul Cho
{"title":"LEAP-008: Lenvatinib Plus Pembrolizumab for Metastatic NSCLC That Has Progressed After an Anti-PD-(L)1 Plus Platinum Chemotherapy.","authors":"Natasha B Leighl, Luis Paz-Ares, Delvys Rodriguez Abreu, Rina Hui, Sofia Baka, Frédéric Bigot, Makoto Nishio, Alexey Smolin, Samreen Ahmed, Adam J Schoenfeld, Sameh Daher, Diego L Cortinovis, Vincenzo Di Noia, Helena Linardou, Justin F Gainor, Corina Dutcus, Chinyere E Okpara, Xuan Deng, Debra Kush, Ashwini Arunachalam, Andrew Song, Byoung Chul Cho","doi":"10.1016/j.jtho.2025.05.020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>LEAP-008 (NCT03976375) was an open-label, randomized, phase 3 study of lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab versus docetaxel for metastatic NSCLC that progressed on anti‒programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1)/programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) therapy and platinum-containing chemotherapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants were randomized 4:4:1 to once-daily lenvatinib 20 mg plus pembrolizumab 200 mg every 3 weeks (maximum 35 cycles), docetaxel 75 mg/m<sup>2</sup> every 3 weeks, or once-daily lenvatinib 24 mg. Primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) per RECIST version 1.1 by central review. Superiority of lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab versus docetaxel was assessed at interim analysis 2 for PFS and at final analysis for OS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants (N=422) were randomized to lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab (n=185), docetaxel (n=189), or lenvatinib monotherapy (n=48). Median (95% CI) PFS was 5.6 (4.2‒6.5) months with lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab and 4.2 (3.2‒5.2) months with docetaxel (hazard ratio [HR], 0.89 [95% CI, 0.70‒1.12]; P=0.164). Median (95% CI) OS was 11.3 (9.4‒13.2) versus 12.0 (9.6‒13.7) months (HR, 0.98 [95% CI, 0.78‒1.23]; P=0.434). Rates of treatment-related adverse events (AEs) were 91.7%, 91.0%, and 89.4% with lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab, docetaxel, and lenvatinib, respectively; rates of grade 3 to 5 treatment-related AEs were 59.7%, 48.6%, and 57.4%. Health-related quality of life scores were similar between treatment arms.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab did not improve efficacy versus docetaxel in participants with stage IV NSCLC that progressed on anti‒PD-1/PD-L1 therapy and platinum-containing chemotherapy. There were no unexpected safety signals. More effective therapies are needed for this patient population.</p>","PeriodicalId":17515,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Thoracic Oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":21.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Thoracic Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtho.2025.05.020","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: LEAP-008 (NCT03976375) was an open-label, randomized, phase 3 study of lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab versus docetaxel for metastatic NSCLC that progressed on anti‒programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1)/programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) therapy and platinum-containing chemotherapy.
Methods: Participants were randomized 4:4:1 to once-daily lenvatinib 20 mg plus pembrolizumab 200 mg every 3 weeks (maximum 35 cycles), docetaxel 75 mg/m2 every 3 weeks, or once-daily lenvatinib 24 mg. Primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) per RECIST version 1.1 by central review. Superiority of lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab versus docetaxel was assessed at interim analysis 2 for PFS and at final analysis for OS.
Results: Participants (N=422) were randomized to lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab (n=185), docetaxel (n=189), or lenvatinib monotherapy (n=48). Median (95% CI) PFS was 5.6 (4.2‒6.5) months with lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab and 4.2 (3.2‒5.2) months with docetaxel (hazard ratio [HR], 0.89 [95% CI, 0.70‒1.12]; P=0.164). Median (95% CI) OS was 11.3 (9.4‒13.2) versus 12.0 (9.6‒13.7) months (HR, 0.98 [95% CI, 0.78‒1.23]; P=0.434). Rates of treatment-related adverse events (AEs) were 91.7%, 91.0%, and 89.4% with lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab, docetaxel, and lenvatinib, respectively; rates of grade 3 to 5 treatment-related AEs were 59.7%, 48.6%, and 57.4%. Health-related quality of life scores were similar between treatment arms.
Conclusion: Lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab did not improve efficacy versus docetaxel in participants with stage IV NSCLC that progressed on anti‒PD-1/PD-L1 therapy and platinum-containing chemotherapy. There were no unexpected safety signals. More effective therapies are needed for this patient population.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Thoracic Oncology (JTO), the official journal of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer,is the primary educational and informational publication for topics relevant to the prevention, detection, diagnosis, and treatment of all thoracic malignancies.The readship includes epidemiologists, medical oncologists, radiation oncologists, thoracic surgeons, pulmonologists, radiologists, pathologists, nuclear medicine physicians, and research scientists with a special interest in thoracic oncology.