Anna Cronström, Thérése Jönsson, Gunilla Limbäck, Marcus Ljung, Caroline Ståhl, Elin Östlind
{"title":"Stairway to heaven via the highway to hell: a qualitative study on patients' experience of knee joint replacement surgery.","authors":"Anna Cronström, Thérése Jönsson, Gunilla Limbäck, Marcus Ljung, Caroline Ståhl, Elin Östlind","doi":"10.1186/s13018-025-05989-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Knee replacement (KR) is the most common osteoarthritis (OA) related surgery. Studies suggest that there are major international and national disparities in pre-operative information, support and access to rehabilitation which have a substantial impact on patients' perceived outcomes of the KR. The aim of this qualitative study was to explore experiences and perceptions of the care pathway in patients who have undergone KR and subsequent rehabilitation in Sweden.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Four focus group discussions were performed including in total 25 patients (16 women), median age 67.5 (range) (46-81 years), 1 to 15 months after KR. The discussion recordings were transcribed verbatim and were analysed qualitatively using content analysis with an inductive approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis resulted in four categories: (1) The crooked road towards surgery, (2) Needing support throughout the whole journey, (3) Feelings of psychological distress and (4) A balancing act towards a new life. A lack of pre-operative information regarding expected pain, need of support and mental well-being were described. Although the journey was sometimes tough, patients' expectations were, however, often fulfilled and they were in general satisfied with the decision to undergo surgery.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Some of the challenges identified in this study may be alleviated by sufficient pre-operative information covering realistic expectations on surgery outcomes and mental aspects as well as emphatic and holistic support by healthcare providers. The result of this study will aid in the development and implementation of a national clinical practice guideline to ensure patient-centered care throughout the KR care pathway.</p>","PeriodicalId":16629,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research","volume":"20 1","pages":"570"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12139267/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-025-05989-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Knee replacement (KR) is the most common osteoarthritis (OA) related surgery. Studies suggest that there are major international and national disparities in pre-operative information, support and access to rehabilitation which have a substantial impact on patients' perceived outcomes of the KR. The aim of this qualitative study was to explore experiences and perceptions of the care pathway in patients who have undergone KR and subsequent rehabilitation in Sweden.
Methods: Four focus group discussions were performed including in total 25 patients (16 women), median age 67.5 (range) (46-81 years), 1 to 15 months after KR. The discussion recordings were transcribed verbatim and were analysed qualitatively using content analysis with an inductive approach.
Results: The analysis resulted in four categories: (1) The crooked road towards surgery, (2) Needing support throughout the whole journey, (3) Feelings of psychological distress and (4) A balancing act towards a new life. A lack of pre-operative information regarding expected pain, need of support and mental well-being were described. Although the journey was sometimes tough, patients' expectations were, however, often fulfilled and they were in general satisfied with the decision to undergo surgery.
Conclusions: Some of the challenges identified in this study may be alleviated by sufficient pre-operative information covering realistic expectations on surgery outcomes and mental aspects as well as emphatic and holistic support by healthcare providers. The result of this study will aid in the development and implementation of a national clinical practice guideline to ensure patient-centered care throughout the KR care pathway.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research is an open access journal that encompasses all aspects of clinical and basic research studies related to musculoskeletal issues.
Orthopaedic research is conducted at clinical and basic science levels. With the advancement of new technologies and the increasing expectation and demand from doctors and patients, we are witnessing an enormous growth in clinical orthopaedic research, particularly in the fields of traumatology, spinal surgery, joint replacement, sports medicine, musculoskeletal tumour management, hand microsurgery, foot and ankle surgery, paediatric orthopaedic, and orthopaedic rehabilitation. The involvement of basic science ranges from molecular, cellular, structural and functional perspectives to tissue engineering, gait analysis, automation and robotic surgery. Implant and biomaterial designs are new disciplines that complement clinical applications.
JOSR encourages the publication of multidisciplinary research with collaboration amongst clinicians and scientists from different disciplines, which will be the trend in the coming decades.