Vietnam's medical ethics framework: aspirations, challenges and the risk of physician burnout.

IF 3.3 2区 哲学 Q1 ETHICS
Ngoc Luong Khanh Nguyen, Thuong Thi Ha Luong, Duc Minh Pham
{"title":"Vietnam's medical ethics framework: aspirations, challenges and the risk of physician burnout.","authors":"Ngoc Luong Khanh Nguyen, Thuong Thi Ha Luong, Duc Minh Pham","doi":"10.1136/jme-2025-110826","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Medical ethics play a fundamental role in global healthcare, ensuring that patients receive care marked by dignity, compassion and fairness. Vietnam's 12 ethical principles, codified in 1996, integrate universal ethical standards with local sociocultural and ideological traditions, particularly emphasising emotional sacrifice, holistic care and social responsibility. While these principles promote professional excellence and community service, this essay argues that their application within Vietnam's under-resourced healthcare system has unintended consequences for physician well-being. An analysis of key domains-including emotional burden from holistic care expectations, administrative and educational overload, emergency care pressures and end-of-life responsibilities-reveals how systemic shortcomings intensify professional strain. Evidence from Vietnam and international comparisons shows that without structured delegation of non-clinical duties, protected working conditions and integrated palliative care systems, physicians face escalating risks of emotional exhaustion, moral injury and career attrition. Unlike healthcare models in developed countries, where ethical standards are balanced by institutional safeguards, Vietnam's framework demands near-unlimited commitment without corresponding systemic support. Unless ethical expectations are recalibrated and support structures are modernised, Vietnam's medical ethics, though noble in aspiration, risk undermining the very sustainability of its healthcare workforce. This essay highlights the need for urgent reform to align Vietnam's ethical ideals with contemporary clinical realities, ensuring that both patient-centred care and physician resilience are protected.</p>","PeriodicalId":16317,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Ethics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Ethics","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/jme-2025-110826","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Medical ethics play a fundamental role in global healthcare, ensuring that patients receive care marked by dignity, compassion and fairness. Vietnam's 12 ethical principles, codified in 1996, integrate universal ethical standards with local sociocultural and ideological traditions, particularly emphasising emotional sacrifice, holistic care and social responsibility. While these principles promote professional excellence and community service, this essay argues that their application within Vietnam's under-resourced healthcare system has unintended consequences for physician well-being. An analysis of key domains-including emotional burden from holistic care expectations, administrative and educational overload, emergency care pressures and end-of-life responsibilities-reveals how systemic shortcomings intensify professional strain. Evidence from Vietnam and international comparisons shows that without structured delegation of non-clinical duties, protected working conditions and integrated palliative care systems, physicians face escalating risks of emotional exhaustion, moral injury and career attrition. Unlike healthcare models in developed countries, where ethical standards are balanced by institutional safeguards, Vietnam's framework demands near-unlimited commitment without corresponding systemic support. Unless ethical expectations are recalibrated and support structures are modernised, Vietnam's medical ethics, though noble in aspiration, risk undermining the very sustainability of its healthcare workforce. This essay highlights the need for urgent reform to align Vietnam's ethical ideals with contemporary clinical realities, ensuring that both patient-centred care and physician resilience are protected.

越南的医学伦理框架:愿望、挑战和医生职业倦怠的风险。
医学伦理在全球医疗保健中发挥着根本作用,确保患者得到尊严、同情和公平的护理。越南于1996年制定的12项道德原则,将普遍的道德标准与当地的社会文化和意识形态传统相结合,特别强调情感牺牲、整体照顾和社会责任。虽然这些原则促进专业卓越和社区服务,这篇文章认为,他们在越南的资源不足的医疗保健系统的应用对医生的福祉产生了意想不到的后果。对关键领域的分析——包括来自整体护理期望的情感负担、行政和教育负担、紧急护理压力和临终责任——揭示了系统缺陷是如何加剧专业压力的。来自越南和国际比较的证据表明,如果没有结构化的非临床职责授权、受保护的工作条件和整合的姑息治疗系统,医生面临情绪衰竭、道德伤害和职业流失的风险不断上升。与发达国家的医疗保健模式不同,在发达国家,道德标准与制度保障相平衡,越南的框架要求几乎无限的承诺,而没有相应的系统支持。除非重新调整道德期望,并使支持结构现代化,否则越南的医疗道德尽管崇高,却有可能破坏其医疗保健队伍的可持续性。这篇文章强调了迫切需要进行改革,使越南的道德理想与当代临床现实保持一致,确保以患者为中心的护理和医生的复原力得到保护。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Medical Ethics
Journal of Medical Ethics 医学-医学:伦理
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
9.80%
发文量
164
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Medical Ethics is a leading international journal that reflects the whole field of medical ethics. The journal seeks to promote ethical reflection and conduct in scientific research and medical practice. It features articles on various ethical aspects of health care relevant to health care professionals, members of clinical ethics committees, medical ethics professionals, researchers and bioscientists, policy makers and patients. Subscribers to the Journal of Medical Ethics also receive Medical Humanities journal at no extra cost. JME is the official journal of the Institute of Medical Ethics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信