Experimental Study on New Polymer Dressings to Accelerate the Epithelialization in Wound Healing.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Cafer Yildirim, Nuray Bayar Muluk, Mustafa Yazir, İskender Yilgör, Cemal Cingi
{"title":"Experimental Study on New Polymer Dressings to Accelerate the Epithelialization in Wound Healing.","authors":"Cafer Yildirim, Nuray Bayar Muluk, Mustafa Yazir, İskender Yilgör, Cemal Cingi","doi":"10.1097/SCS.0000000000011549","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>In this study, the authors applied polymers to an open wound and tried to determine their contribution to its closure or healing process.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eighteen adult male Wistar albino rats weighing between 190 and 220 g were used in the experiment. The animals were randomly divided into groups (n=6): group 1, group 2, and group 3. First experimental group (polymer 1, IY-04-109 ) (n=6), second experimental group (polymer 2, IY-04-225) (n=6), third control group (meloline) (n=6). Wounds with a diameter of 0.3cm were created in the dorsal region of the animals; the polymer patches provided were fixed to the wound from both sides with 2 simple sutures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>IY-04-109 and IY-04-225 are similar in composition and synthesis. They should both be biocompatible. Both are polydimethyl silicon-urea copolymers. The differences are that IY-04-109 used a PDMS with a molecular weight of 3200 g/mol, and urea was 13.9%. It was determined that polymer suturing upon the wound surface provided healing with healthy mucosa before scar tissue developed. Both groups, 1 and 2, were better than the control group. Polymer IY-04-225, used in group 2 animals, accelerated the epithelialization faster.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In IY-04-225, a PDMS with a molecular weight of 11,000 g/mol was used. The amount of urea is 9.6%. There is more PDMS in IY-04-225, and the molecular weight of the PDMS is very high. This can lead to differences in polymer surface properties, which may explain why the second group is slightly better.</p>","PeriodicalId":15462,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Craniofacial Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Craniofacial Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000011549","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: In this study, the authors applied polymers to an open wound and tried to determine their contribution to its closure or healing process.

Methods: Eighteen adult male Wistar albino rats weighing between 190 and 220 g were used in the experiment. The animals were randomly divided into groups (n=6): group 1, group 2, and group 3. First experimental group (polymer 1, IY-04-109 ) (n=6), second experimental group (polymer 2, IY-04-225) (n=6), third control group (meloline) (n=6). Wounds with a diameter of 0.3cm were created in the dorsal region of the animals; the polymer patches provided were fixed to the wound from both sides with 2 simple sutures.

Results: IY-04-109 and IY-04-225 are similar in composition and synthesis. They should both be biocompatible. Both are polydimethyl silicon-urea copolymers. The differences are that IY-04-109 used a PDMS with a molecular weight of 3200 g/mol, and urea was 13.9%. It was determined that polymer suturing upon the wound surface provided healing with healthy mucosa before scar tissue developed. Both groups, 1 and 2, were better than the control group. Polymer IY-04-225, used in group 2 animals, accelerated the epithelialization faster.

Conclusion: In IY-04-225, a PDMS with a molecular weight of 11,000 g/mol was used. The amount of urea is 9.6%. There is more PDMS in IY-04-225, and the molecular weight of the PDMS is very high. This can lead to differences in polymer surface properties, which may explain why the second group is slightly better.

新型高分子敷料促进创面上皮化的实验研究。
目的:在这项研究中,作者将聚合物应用于开放性伤口,并试图确定它们对伤口闭合或愈合过程的贡献。方法:选用体重190 ~ 220 g的成年雄性Wistar白化大鼠18只。随机分为1组、2组、3组(n=6)。第一实验组(聚合物1,y -04-109) (n=6),第二实验组(聚合物2,y -04-225) (n=6),第三对照组(meloline) (n=6)。动物背部创面直径0.3cm;所提供的聚合物贴片用2个简单的缝合线从两侧固定在伤口上。结果:IY-04-109与IY-04-225在组成和合成上相似。它们都应该是生物相容的。两者都是聚二甲基硅-尿素共聚物。不同之处在于,IY-04-109使用了分子量为3200g /mol的PDMS,尿素含量为13.9%。结果表明,在瘢痕组织形成之前,伤口表面的聚合物缝合可提供健康粘膜的愈合。第1组和第2组均优于对照组。聚合物y -04-225在2组动物中使用,加速上皮形成的速度更快。结论:在IY-04-225中使用了分子量为11000 g/mol的PDMS。尿素的用量为9.6%。IY-04-225中含有较多的PDMS,且PDMS分子量很高。这可能导致聚合物表面特性的差异,这可能解释了为什么第二组稍微好一点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
11.10%
发文量
968
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: ​The Journal of Craniofacial Surgery serves as a forum of communication for all those involved in craniofacial surgery, maxillofacial surgery and pediatric plastic surgery. Coverage ranges from practical aspects of craniofacial surgery to the basic science that underlies surgical practice. The journal publishes original articles, scientific reviews, editorials and invited commentary, abstracts and selected articles from international journals, and occasional international bibliographies in craniofacial surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信