Race-Performance Parameters Differentiating World-Best From National-Level Swimmers: A Race Video Analysis and Machine-Learning Approach.

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 PHYSIOLOGY
Giovanni L Postiglione, Shaun Abbott, Phillip Newman, Lachlan G Mitchell, Marc Elipot, Gary Barclay, Stephen Cobley
{"title":"Race-Performance Parameters Differentiating World-Best From National-Level Swimmers: A Race Video Analysis and Machine-Learning Approach.","authors":"Giovanni L Postiglione, Shaun Abbott, Phillip Newman, Lachlan G Mitchell, Marc Elipot, Gary Barclay, Stephen Cobley","doi":"10.1123/ijspp.2024-0486","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Elite swimming performance is determined by a complex interplay of anthropometric, physiological, biomechanical, and technical factors. Previous research highlights how the 100-m freestyle demands explosive power, technical proficiency, and tactical acumen, yet factors that distinguish world-class swimmers from their closely performing (inter)national-level counterparts remain elusive.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To identify race-performance factors differentiating world-class swimmers in the 100-m freestyle.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>World-best to national-level (N = 204) male swimmers competing at long-course events between 2019 and 2024 were analyzed using high-definition video and race-analysis software. Key performance metrics including stroke rate and length, turn efficiency, underwater phase duration, and velocity at 5-m intervals were extracted. Using a machine-learning random forest algorithm, the most salient factors distinguishing between world-class (0%-2.5% off world record), international-level (2.5%-5% off), and national-level (5%-10% off) performance categories were identified.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Analyses revealed a model classification accuracy of 89.5% with swim velocities at 65- to 70- and 70- to 75-m race segments most strongly associated with performance-level differentiation. These 2 race segments scored twice as high as all the other top 10 features. Shapley additive explanations (SHAP) analysis confirmed the importance of midrace velocities, while partial dependence plots identified the necessary velocity range values likely associated with national- to world-class performance levels.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The combination of race analysis and machine learning creates the opportunity for targeted intervention for coaches and sport scientists working with high-performing 100-m male swimmers.</p>","PeriodicalId":14295,"journal":{"name":"International journal of sports physiology and performance","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of sports physiology and performance","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1123/ijspp.2024-0486","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Elite swimming performance is determined by a complex interplay of anthropometric, physiological, biomechanical, and technical factors. Previous research highlights how the 100-m freestyle demands explosive power, technical proficiency, and tactical acumen, yet factors that distinguish world-class swimmers from their closely performing (inter)national-level counterparts remain elusive.

Purpose: To identify race-performance factors differentiating world-class swimmers in the 100-m freestyle.

Methods: World-best to national-level (N = 204) male swimmers competing at long-course events between 2019 and 2024 were analyzed using high-definition video and race-analysis software. Key performance metrics including stroke rate and length, turn efficiency, underwater phase duration, and velocity at 5-m intervals were extracted. Using a machine-learning random forest algorithm, the most salient factors distinguishing between world-class (0%-2.5% off world record), international-level (2.5%-5% off), and national-level (5%-10% off) performance categories were identified.

Results: Analyses revealed a model classification accuracy of 89.5% with swim velocities at 65- to 70- and 70- to 75-m race segments most strongly associated with performance-level differentiation. These 2 race segments scored twice as high as all the other top 10 features. Shapley additive explanations (SHAP) analysis confirmed the importance of midrace velocities, while partial dependence plots identified the necessary velocity range values likely associated with national- to world-class performance levels.

Conclusions: The combination of race analysis and machine learning creates the opportunity for targeted intervention for coaches and sport scientists working with high-performing 100-m male swimmers.

区分世界级和国家级游泳运动员的比赛表现参数:一种比赛视频分析和机器学习方法。
背景:优秀的游泳成绩是由人体测量学、生理学、生物力学和技术因素的复杂相互作用决定的。先前的研究强调了100米自由泳对爆发力、技术熟练度和战术敏别性的要求,然而,将世界级游泳运动员与表现接近的(国际)国家级选手区分开来的因素仍然难以捉摸。目的:确定区分世界级100米自由泳运动员的比赛表现因素。方法:采用高清视频和赛事分析软件,对2019 - 2024年世界至国家级男子游泳运动员(N = 204)的长距离游泳比赛进行分析。关键性能指标包括冲程速率和长度、转弯效率、水下相位持续时间和5米间隔的速度。使用机器学习随机森林算法,确定了区分世界级(比世界纪录低0%-2.5%)、国际级(比世界纪录低2.5%-5%)和国家级(比世界纪录低5%-10%)性能类别的最显著因素。结果:分析显示,游泳速度在65- 70米和70- 75米赛段与成绩水平分化最密切相关的模型分类准确率为89.5%。这两个竞赛环节的得分是其他前10大功能的两倍。Shapley加性解释(SHAP)分析证实了中间速度的重要性,而部分依赖图则确定了可能与国家至世界级性能水平相关的必要速度范围值。结论:比赛分析和机器学习的结合为训练优秀的100米男子游泳运动员的教练和运动科学家提供了有针对性的干预机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
12.10%
发文量
199
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance (IJSPP) focuses on sport physiology and performance and is dedicated to advancing the knowledge of sport and exercise physiologists, sport-performance researchers, and other sport scientists. The journal publishes authoritative peer-reviewed research in sport physiology and related disciplines, with an emphasis on work having direct practical applications in enhancing sport performance in sport physiology and related disciplines. IJSPP publishes 10 issues per year: January, February, March, April, May, July, August, September, October, and November.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信