Effects of Position and Injury Status on Associations Between Preseason Workload and Heart-Rate Variability Profiles in American College Football Players.
Andrew A Flatt, Jeff R Allen, Clay M Keith, Michael R Esco
{"title":"Effects of Position and Injury Status on Associations Between Preseason Workload and Heart-Rate Variability Profiles in American College Football Players.","authors":"Andrew A Flatt, Jeff R Allen, Clay M Keith, Michael R Esco","doi":"10.1123/ijspp.2024-0469","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To quantify position-specific associations between heart-rate-variability profile characteristics and external-workload parameters in American college football players during preseason camp while accounting for injury-related participation status.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty-seven players categorized into skill (n = 15) and midskill (n = 12) position groups participated in the study. Players were further categorized as having \"full go\" (n = 15) or \"go as can\" (n = 12) participation status. The camp mean and coefficient of variation (CV) (indexing daily variation) for various workload parameters and resting heart rate and the natural log of the root mean square of successive differences (LnRMSSD) were quantified.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Skill players who consistently performed higher total workloads (total distance and player load) exhibited the most stable LnRMSSD (ie, lower CV; P < .05), while midskill players with the highest total workloads exhibited greater daily variation in LnRMSSD (ie, higher CV; P < .05). These associations persisted after injury-status adjustment. However, consistent between position groups, players with greater daily variation in select workload parameters also showed greater daily variation in LnRMSSD (P < .05). No between-groups differences for injury status were observed (P > .05), although effect-size analysis showed that LnRMSSD was moderately greater in \"full go\" players (effect size = 0.73, P < .07).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Daily LnRMSSD variation better reflected position-specific workload responses, whereas mean LnRMSSD may affect or be affected by injury status. While skill players tolerated high total workloads with stable LnRMSSD, midskill players exhibited less day-to-day variation in LnRMSSD and high-intensity outputs at moderate workloads.</p>","PeriodicalId":14295,"journal":{"name":"International journal of sports physiology and performance","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of sports physiology and performance","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1123/ijspp.2024-0469","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: To quantify position-specific associations between heart-rate-variability profile characteristics and external-workload parameters in American college football players during preseason camp while accounting for injury-related participation status.
Methods: Twenty-seven players categorized into skill (n = 15) and midskill (n = 12) position groups participated in the study. Players were further categorized as having "full go" (n = 15) or "go as can" (n = 12) participation status. The camp mean and coefficient of variation (CV) (indexing daily variation) for various workload parameters and resting heart rate and the natural log of the root mean square of successive differences (LnRMSSD) were quantified.
Results: Skill players who consistently performed higher total workloads (total distance and player load) exhibited the most stable LnRMSSD (ie, lower CV; P < .05), while midskill players with the highest total workloads exhibited greater daily variation in LnRMSSD (ie, higher CV; P < .05). These associations persisted after injury-status adjustment. However, consistent between position groups, players with greater daily variation in select workload parameters also showed greater daily variation in LnRMSSD (P < .05). No between-groups differences for injury status were observed (P > .05), although effect-size analysis showed that LnRMSSD was moderately greater in "full go" players (effect size = 0.73, P < .07).
Conclusions: Daily LnRMSSD variation better reflected position-specific workload responses, whereas mean LnRMSSD may affect or be affected by injury status. While skill players tolerated high total workloads with stable LnRMSSD, midskill players exhibited less day-to-day variation in LnRMSSD and high-intensity outputs at moderate workloads.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance (IJSPP) focuses on sport physiology and performance and is dedicated to advancing the knowledge of sport and exercise physiologists, sport-performance researchers, and other sport scientists. The journal publishes authoritative peer-reviewed research in sport physiology and related disciplines, with an emphasis on work having direct practical applications in enhancing sport performance in sport physiology and related disciplines. IJSPP publishes 10 issues per year: January, February, March, April, May, July, August, September, October, and November.