Investigating Symptom Duration Using Current Status Data: A Case Study of Postacute COVID-19 Syndrome.

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Charles J Wolock, Susan Jacob, Julia C Bennett, Anna Elias-Warren, Jessica O'Hanlon, Avi Kenny, Nicholas P Jewell, Andrea Rotnitzky, Stephen R Cole, Ana A Weil, Helen Y Chu, Marco Carone
{"title":"Investigating Symptom Duration Using Current Status Data: A Case Study of Postacute COVID-19 Syndrome.","authors":"Charles J Wolock, Susan Jacob, Julia C Bennett, Anna Elias-Warren, Jessica O'Hanlon, Avi Kenny, Nicholas P Jewell, Andrea Rotnitzky, Stephen R Cole, Ana A Weil, Helen Y Chu, Marco Carone","doi":"10.1097/EDE.0000000000001882","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>For infectious diseases, characterizing symptom duration is of clinical and public health importance. Symptom duration may be assessed by surveying infected individuals and querying symptom status at the time of survey response. For example, in a severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 testing program at the University of Washington, participants were surveyed at least 28 days after testing positive and asked to report current symptom status. This study design yielded current status data: outcome measurements for each respondent consisted only of the time of survey response and a binary indicator of whether symptoms had resolved by that time. Such study design benefits from limited risk of recall bias, but analyzing the resulting data necessitates tailored statistical tools.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We review methods for current status data and describe a novel application of modern nonparametric techniques to this setting. The proposed approach is valid under weaker assumptions compared with existing methods, allows the use of flexible machine learning tools, and handles potential survey nonresponse. Our method relies on the assumption that the survey response time is conditionally independent of symptom resolution time within strata of measured covariates, and we propose an approach to assess the sensitivity of results to deviations from conditional independence.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From the university study, we estimate that 19% of participants experienced ongoing symptoms 30 days after testing positive, decreasing to 7% at 90 days. We found the estimates to be more sensitive to violations of the conditional independence assumption at 30 days compared with 90 days. Female sex, fatigue during acute infection, and higher viral load were associated with slower symptom resolution.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The proposed method and accompanying sensitivity analysis procedure provide tools for investigators faced with current status data.</p>","PeriodicalId":11779,"journal":{"name":"Epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/EDE.0000000000001882","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: For infectious diseases, characterizing symptom duration is of clinical and public health importance. Symptom duration may be assessed by surveying infected individuals and querying symptom status at the time of survey response. For example, in a severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 testing program at the University of Washington, participants were surveyed at least 28 days after testing positive and asked to report current symptom status. This study design yielded current status data: outcome measurements for each respondent consisted only of the time of survey response and a binary indicator of whether symptoms had resolved by that time. Such study design benefits from limited risk of recall bias, but analyzing the resulting data necessitates tailored statistical tools.

Methods: We review methods for current status data and describe a novel application of modern nonparametric techniques to this setting. The proposed approach is valid under weaker assumptions compared with existing methods, allows the use of flexible machine learning tools, and handles potential survey nonresponse. Our method relies on the assumption that the survey response time is conditionally independent of symptom resolution time within strata of measured covariates, and we propose an approach to assess the sensitivity of results to deviations from conditional independence.

Results: From the university study, we estimate that 19% of participants experienced ongoing symptoms 30 days after testing positive, decreasing to 7% at 90 days. We found the estimates to be more sensitive to violations of the conditional independence assumption at 30 days compared with 90 days. Female sex, fatigue during acute infection, and higher viral load were associated with slower symptom resolution.

Conclusion: The proposed method and accompanying sensitivity analysis procedure provide tools for investigators faced with current status data.

利用现状数据调查症状持续时间:以急性后COVID-19综合征为例
背景:对传染病而言,表征症状持续时间具有重要的临床和公共卫生意义。症状持续时间可通过调查受感染个体并在调查回复时查询症状状态来评估。例如,在华盛顿大学的一个严重急性呼吸系统综合征冠状病毒检测项目中,参与者在检测呈阳性后至少28天接受了调查,并被要求报告目前的症状状况。该研究设计产生了当前状态数据:每个应答者的结果测量仅包括调查应答时间和到那时症状是否消退的二元指标。这样的研究设计得益于有限的回忆偏倚风险,但分析结果数据需要量身定制的统计工具。方法:我们回顾了当前状态数据的方法,并描述了现代非参数技术在此设置中的新应用。与现有方法相比,所提出的方法在较弱的假设下是有效的,允许使用灵活的机器学习工具,并处理潜在的调查无响应。我们的方法依赖于这样的假设,即调查反应时间与测量协变量层内的症状解决时间有条件独立,我们提出了一种评估结果对条件独立偏差的敏感性的方法。结果:从大学研究中,我们估计19%的参与者在检测呈阳性后30天出现持续症状,在90天下降到7%。我们发现,与90天相比,30天的估计对违反条件独立假设的情况更为敏感。女性、急性感染期间的疲劳和较高的病毒载量与较慢的症状缓解有关。结论:所提出的方法和随附的敏感性分析程序为面对现状数据的调查人员提供了工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Epidemiology
Epidemiology 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
3.70%
发文量
177
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Epidemiology publishes original research from all fields of epidemiology. The journal also welcomes review articles and meta-analyses, novel hypotheses, descriptions and applications of new methods, and discussions of research theory or public health policy. We give special consideration to papers from developing countries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信