Chronic idiopathic axonal neuropathy: antibodies, genetics, and beyond.

IF 4.4 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Current Opinion in Neurology Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-06-05 DOI:10.1097/WCO.0000000000001387
Mehmet Can Sari, Ahmet Hoke
{"title":"Chronic idiopathic axonal neuropathy: antibodies, genetics, and beyond.","authors":"Mehmet Can Sari, Ahmet Hoke","doi":"10.1097/WCO.0000000000001387","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Chronic idiopathic axonal neuropathy (CIAP) remains a diagnostic challenge, with many cases historically classified as idiopathic due to the absence of identifiable genetic, metabolic, or immune-mediated causes. This review examines recent advancements in understanding CIAP, focusing on novel genetic mutations, autoantibodies, and metabolic pathways that challenge the \"idiopathic\" designation. Specifically, we highlight sorbitol dehydrogenase (SORD) deficiency and replication factor C subunit 1 (RFC1) repeat expansions, and comment on the controversy surrounding autoantibody-associated small fiber neuropathy (SFN).</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Biallelic SORD mutations have emerged as a leading cause of recessive axonal neuropathy, linked to sorbitol accumulation and neurotoxicity, with aldose reductase inhibitors (ARIs) being explored as a potential therapy. RFC1 intronic repeat expansions have been identified as a major genetic contributor to CANVAS and sensory neuropathies, reshaping diagnostic approaches for patients previously classified as idiopathic. Additionally, the identification of autoantibodies such as trisulfated heparin disaccharide (TS-HDS), fibroblast growth factor receptor 3 (FGFR-3), and Plexin D1 in SFN suggests an immune-mediated pathology in a subset of patients but a negative randomized trial of IVIG and lack of specificity of TS-HDS IgM antibody testing questions the relevance of these presumed autoantibodies.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Advances in genetics, immunology, and metabolic neuropathies are redefining CIAP. The identification of SORD deficiency, RFC1 expansions, and autoantibody-associated SFN highlights the need for biomarker-driven approaches and targeted therapies. Future research should focus on expanding genetic screening, optimizing immunotherapy strategies, and investigating novel metabolic contributors to CIAP, ultimately moving toward precise, mechanism-based diagnoses.</p>","PeriodicalId":11059,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Neurology","volume":" ","pages":"496-500"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/WCO.0000000000001387","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose of review: Chronic idiopathic axonal neuropathy (CIAP) remains a diagnostic challenge, with many cases historically classified as idiopathic due to the absence of identifiable genetic, metabolic, or immune-mediated causes. This review examines recent advancements in understanding CIAP, focusing on novel genetic mutations, autoantibodies, and metabolic pathways that challenge the "idiopathic" designation. Specifically, we highlight sorbitol dehydrogenase (SORD) deficiency and replication factor C subunit 1 (RFC1) repeat expansions, and comment on the controversy surrounding autoantibody-associated small fiber neuropathy (SFN).

Recent findings: Biallelic SORD mutations have emerged as a leading cause of recessive axonal neuropathy, linked to sorbitol accumulation and neurotoxicity, with aldose reductase inhibitors (ARIs) being explored as a potential therapy. RFC1 intronic repeat expansions have been identified as a major genetic contributor to CANVAS and sensory neuropathies, reshaping diagnostic approaches for patients previously classified as idiopathic. Additionally, the identification of autoantibodies such as trisulfated heparin disaccharide (TS-HDS), fibroblast growth factor receptor 3 (FGFR-3), and Plexin D1 in SFN suggests an immune-mediated pathology in a subset of patients but a negative randomized trial of IVIG and lack of specificity of TS-HDS IgM antibody testing questions the relevance of these presumed autoantibodies.

Summary: Advances in genetics, immunology, and metabolic neuropathies are redefining CIAP. The identification of SORD deficiency, RFC1 expansions, and autoantibody-associated SFN highlights the need for biomarker-driven approaches and targeted therapies. Future research should focus on expanding genetic screening, optimizing immunotherapy strategies, and investigating novel metabolic contributors to CIAP, ultimately moving toward precise, mechanism-based diagnoses.

慢性特发性轴突神经病:抗体、遗传学及其他。
综述目的:慢性特发性轴突神经病(CIAP)仍然是一个诊断挑战,由于缺乏可识别的遗传、代谢或免疫介导的原因,许多病例历史上被归类为特发性。本文回顾了最近在理解CIAP方面的进展,重点关注新的基因突变、自身抗体和挑战“特发性”称号的代谢途径。具体来说,我们强调了山梨糖醇脱氢酶(SORD)缺陷和复制因子C亚基1 (RFC1)重复扩增,并评论了围绕自身抗体相关的小纤维神经病(SFN)的争议。最近发现:双等位基因SORD突变已成为隐性轴突神经病变的主要原因,与山梨糖醇积累和神经毒性有关,醛糖还原酶抑制剂(ARIs)正在被探索作为一种潜在的治疗方法。RFC1内含子重复扩增已被确定为CANVAS和感觉神经病变的主要遗传因素,重塑了以前归类为特发性患者的诊断方法。此外,在SFN中发现自身抗体,如三磺酸肝素双糖(TS-HDS)、成纤维细胞生长因子受体3 (FGFR-3)和丛状蛋白D1,表明在一部分患者中存在免疫介导的病理,但IVIG的阴性随机试验和TS-HDS IgM抗体检测缺乏特异性,质疑这些假定的自身抗体的相关性。总结:遗传学、免疫学和代谢性神经病的进展正在重新定义CIAP。SORD缺陷、RFC1扩增和自身抗体相关的SFN的鉴定强调了生物标志物驱动方法和靶向治疗的必要性。未来的研究应该集中在扩大基因筛查,优化免疫治疗策略,研究新的代谢因子,最终走向精确的,基于机制的诊断。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Current Opinion in Neurology
Current Opinion in Neurology 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
174
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: ​​​​​​​​Current Opinion in Neurology is a highly regarded journal offering insightful editorials and on-the-mark invited reviews; covering key subjects such as cerebrovascular disease, developmental disorders, neuroimaging and demyelinating diseases. Published bimonthly, each issue of Current Opinion in Neurology introduces world renowned guest editors and internationally recognized academics within the neurology field, delivering a widespread selection of expert assessments on the latest developments from the most recent literature.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信