A Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing the Effectiveness of Emotion-Focused and Behavioral Parent Training in Families of School-aged Children with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Ghazaleh Zargarinejad, Joann Wu Shortt, J Mark Eddy, Saeed Ebadi Zare, Banafsheh Gharraee, Hojjatollah Farahani, Asma Aghebati, Elham Shirazi
{"title":"A Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing the Effectiveness of Emotion-Focused and Behavioral Parent Training in Families of School-aged Children with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder.","authors":"Ghazaleh Zargarinejad, Joann Wu Shortt, J Mark Eddy, Saeed Ebadi Zare, Banafsheh Gharraee, Hojjatollah Farahani, Asma Aghebati, Elham Shirazi","doi":"10.1007/s10578-025-01868-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Behavioral Parent Training (BPT) is a well-established intervention for Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder; however, it has been criticized for its limited focus on enhancing parental emotion regulation (ER) skills, which are crucial for supporting children's emotional development. This gap underscores the need to examine the effectiveness of ER-focused parental interventions in comparison to BPT. The present study aimed to compare the effectiveness of an EF parenting and a BPT intervention on various child- and mother-related outcomes in families of school-aged children with ADHD. Fifty-nine participants were randomly assigned to an EF intervention (The Emotions Program), a BPT intervention (Triple P Positive Parenting Program), or a waitlist control group, with data from forty-seven participants (mean child age = 8.00; SD = 1.38; 72.3% boys) included in the final analyses. The treatment groups received structured, manual-based interventions, while the waitlist group received the BPT intervention after the final assessment. Assessments were conducted at pre-intervention, post-intervention, and a two-month follow-up. Results from repeated-measures ANOVAs and post-hoc analyses indicated that both EF and BPT led to significant improvements compared to the control group, though each approach had distinct effects. Both interventions significantly reduced child conduct problem scores; however, EF was particularly effective in decreasing non-supportive maternal reactions, alleviating parenting stress, and improving parental emotion regulation, while BPT showed greater effectiveness in reducing ADHD symptoms and child emotion dysregulation. These findings highlight the importance of tailoring interventions to address specific parental and child needs, suggesting that integrating EF and BPT approaches may provide a more comprehensive framework for supporting families of children with ADHD.</p>","PeriodicalId":10024,"journal":{"name":"Child Psychiatry & Human Development","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Child Psychiatry & Human Development","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10578-025-01868-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Behavioral Parent Training (BPT) is a well-established intervention for Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder; however, it has been criticized for its limited focus on enhancing parental emotion regulation (ER) skills, which are crucial for supporting children's emotional development. This gap underscores the need to examine the effectiveness of ER-focused parental interventions in comparison to BPT. The present study aimed to compare the effectiveness of an EF parenting and a BPT intervention on various child- and mother-related outcomes in families of school-aged children with ADHD. Fifty-nine participants were randomly assigned to an EF intervention (The Emotions Program), a BPT intervention (Triple P Positive Parenting Program), or a waitlist control group, with data from forty-seven participants (mean child age = 8.00; SD = 1.38; 72.3% boys) included in the final analyses. The treatment groups received structured, manual-based interventions, while the waitlist group received the BPT intervention after the final assessment. Assessments were conducted at pre-intervention, post-intervention, and a two-month follow-up. Results from repeated-measures ANOVAs and post-hoc analyses indicated that both EF and BPT led to significant improvements compared to the control group, though each approach had distinct effects. Both interventions significantly reduced child conduct problem scores; however, EF was particularly effective in decreasing non-supportive maternal reactions, alleviating parenting stress, and improving parental emotion regulation, while BPT showed greater effectiveness in reducing ADHD symptoms and child emotion dysregulation. These findings highlight the importance of tailoring interventions to address specific parental and child needs, suggesting that integrating EF and BPT approaches may provide a more comprehensive framework for supporting families of children with ADHD.

一项比较情绪集中和行为父母训练在学龄期注意缺陷/多动障碍儿童家庭中的效果的随机临床试验。
行为父母训练(BPT)是一种行之有效的干预注意力缺陷/多动障碍;然而,该研究因其对提高父母情绪调节(ER)技能的关注有限而受到批评,而这对支持儿童的情绪发展至关重要。这一差距强调有必要检查以急诊室为重点的父母干预与BPT相比的有效性。本研究旨在比较EF育儿和BPT干预对患有ADHD的学龄儿童家庭中各种儿童和母亲相关结果的有效性。59名参与者被随机分配到EF干预组(情绪计划)、BPT干预组(3p积极育儿计划)或等候名单对照组,数据来自47名参与者(平均儿童年龄= 8.00;sd = 1.38;72.3%男生)纳入最终分析。治疗组接受结构化的、基于手册的干预,而等候组在最终评估后接受BPT干预。评估分别在干预前、干预后和两个月的随访中进行。重复测量方差分析和事后分析的结果表明,与对照组相比,EF和BPT都有显著的改善,尽管每种方法都有不同的效果。两种干预措施都显著降低了儿童行为问题得分;然而,EF在减少母亲的非支持性反应、减轻父母的压力和改善父母的情绪调节方面特别有效,而BPT在减少ADHD症状和儿童情绪失调方面表现出更大的效果。这些发现强调了定制干预措施的重要性,以满足特定的父母和儿童的需求,表明整合EF和BPT方法可能为支持ADHD儿童家庭提供更全面的框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
3.40%
发文量
174
期刊介绍: Child Psychiatry & Human Development is an interdisciplinary international journal serving the groups represented by child and adolescent psychiatry, clinical child/pediatric/family psychology, pediatrics, social science, and human development. The journal publishes research on diagnosis, assessment, treatment, epidemiology, development, advocacy, training, cultural factors, ethics, policy, and professional issues as related to clinical disorders in children, adolescents, and families. The journal publishes peer-reviewed original empirical research in addition to substantive and theoretical reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信