Association between family history and onset age of cancer in China.

IF 7.5 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Fan Yang, He Li, Maomao Cao, Xinxin Yan, Siyi He, Shaoli Zhang, Qianru Li, Yi Teng, Changfa Xia, Hongmei Zeng, Yunyong Liu, Wanqing Chen
{"title":"Association between family history and onset age of cancer in China.","authors":"Fan Yang, He Li, Maomao Cao, Xinxin Yan, Siyi He, Shaoli Zhang, Qianru Li, Yi Teng, Changfa Xia, Hongmei Zeng, Yunyong Liu, Wanqing Chen","doi":"10.1097/CM9.0000000000003624","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Family history (FH) of cancer is an established risk factor for early onset of cancer. However, reliable estimates on the difference in onset age between familial and sporadic cancers remain scarce in the Chinese population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This multicenter, hospital-based, cross-sectional study included 23 hospitals across 12 provinces. Patients diagnosed with cancers of the lung, stomach, esophagus, or colorectum between January 1, 2016 and December 31, 2017 were identified. Detailed information on sociodemographic characteristics, lifestyle factors, stage at diagnosis, and onset age was collected. We analyzed the association between FH and onset age across different cancer types using quantile regressions, and the potential bias was explored.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 41,072 eligible patients, 3054 (7.44%) reported a first-degree FH of cancer, and they were diagnosed at younger ages than those without FH (median difference: -1.19, 95% confidence interval [CI]: -1.59 to -0.79). Stratified by cancer type, the most pronounced difference was observed in colorectal cancer (median difference: -2.25, 95% CI: -3.31 to -1.19). Failure to account for lead time bias resulted in an overestimation of the FH effect, ranging from 3.4% to 15.4% across cancer types. Quantile regression analysis revealed that the impact of FH on age at diagnosis was more pronounced at the upper tail of the age distribution for all cancers combined and for each cancer type individually.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings suggest that FH of cancer is associated with the early onset of lung, stomach, esophageal, and colorectal cancers in China. Cancer screening at earlier ages is needed for individuals with an FH.</p>","PeriodicalId":10183,"journal":{"name":"Chinese Medical Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chinese Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CM9.0000000000003624","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Family history (FH) of cancer is an established risk factor for early onset of cancer. However, reliable estimates on the difference in onset age between familial and sporadic cancers remain scarce in the Chinese population.

Methods: This multicenter, hospital-based, cross-sectional study included 23 hospitals across 12 provinces. Patients diagnosed with cancers of the lung, stomach, esophagus, or colorectum between January 1, 2016 and December 31, 2017 were identified. Detailed information on sociodemographic characteristics, lifestyle factors, stage at diagnosis, and onset age was collected. We analyzed the association between FH and onset age across different cancer types using quantile regressions, and the potential bias was explored.

Results: Among 41,072 eligible patients, 3054 (7.44%) reported a first-degree FH of cancer, and they were diagnosed at younger ages than those without FH (median difference: -1.19, 95% confidence interval [CI]: -1.59 to -0.79). Stratified by cancer type, the most pronounced difference was observed in colorectal cancer (median difference: -2.25, 95% CI: -3.31 to -1.19). Failure to account for lead time bias resulted in an overestimation of the FH effect, ranging from 3.4% to 15.4% across cancer types. Quantile regression analysis revealed that the impact of FH on age at diagnosis was more pronounced at the upper tail of the age distribution for all cancers combined and for each cancer type individually.

Conclusions: Our findings suggest that FH of cancer is associated with the early onset of lung, stomach, esophageal, and colorectal cancers in China. Cancer screening at earlier ages is needed for individuals with an FH.

中国癌症家族史与发病年龄的关系
背景:癌症家族史(FH)是癌症早发的确定危险因素。然而,在中国人群中,关于家族性癌症和散发性癌症发病年龄差异的可靠估计仍然很少。方法:这项多中心、以医院为基础的横断面研究纳入了12个省的23家医院。2016年1月1日至2017年12月31日期间被诊断患有肺癌、胃癌、食道癌或结直肠癌的患者被确定。收集了社会人口学特征、生活方式因素、诊断阶段和发病年龄的详细信息。我们使用分位数回归分析了FH与不同癌症类型的发病年龄之间的关系,并探讨了潜在的偏倚。结果:在41,072例符合条件的患者中,3054例(7.44%)报告了癌症的一级FH,他们的诊断年龄比没有FH的患者年轻(中位差:-1.19,95%可信区间[CI]: -1.59至-0.79)。按癌症类型分层,结肠直肠癌的差异最为显著(中位数差异:-2.25,95% CI: -3.31至-1.19)。未能考虑到前置时间偏差导致对FH效应的高估,在不同癌症类型中范围从3.4%到15.4%不等。分位数回归分析显示,FH对诊断年龄的影响在所有癌症组合和每种癌症类型的年龄分布的上尾更为明显。结论:我们的研究结果表明,在中国,癌症的FH与肺癌、胃癌、食管癌和结直肠癌的早期发病有关。对于FH患者,需要在早期进行癌症筛查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Chinese Medical Journal
Chinese Medical Journal 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
4.90%
发文量
19245
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The Chinese Medical Journal (CMJ) is published semimonthly in English by the Chinese Medical Association, and is a peer reviewed general medical journal for all doctors, researchers, and health workers regardless of their medical specialty or type of employment. Established in 1887, it is the oldest medical periodical in China and is distributed worldwide. The journal functions as a window into China’s medical sciences and reflects the advances and progress in China’s medical sciences and technology. It serves the objective of international academic exchange. The journal includes Original Articles, Editorial, Review Articles, Medical Progress, Brief Reports, Case Reports, Viewpoint, Clinical Exchange, Letter,and News,etc. CMJ is abstracted or indexed in many databases including Biological Abstracts, Chemical Abstracts, Index Medicus/Medline, Science Citation Index (SCI), Current Contents, Cancerlit, Health Plan & Administration, Embase, Social Scisearch, Aidsline, Toxline, Biocommercial Abstracts, Arts and Humanities Search, Nuclear Science Abstracts, Water Resources Abstracts, Cab Abstracts, Occupation Safety & Health, etc. In 2007, the impact factor of the journal by SCI is 0.636, and the total citation is 2315.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信