Carol L Shields, Henry Nguyen, Shady Mina, Gabrielle E Kozlowski, Ayra Khan, Madison M Woods, Rolika Bansal, Hidayet Sener, Arupa Ganguly, Sara E Lally, Jerry A Shields
{"title":"Metastasis-free survival outcomes of uveal melanoma based on The Cancer Genome Atlas classification in 1585 cases.","authors":"Carol L Shields, Henry Nguyen, Shady Mina, Gabrielle E Kozlowski, Ayra Khan, Madison M Woods, Rolika Bansal, Hidayet Sener, Arupa Ganguly, Sara E Lally, Jerry A Shields","doi":"10.1016/j.jcjo.2025.05.017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Genetic testing for uveal melanoma and tumour size is important in prognostication.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A review of 1 585 patients with uveal melanoma who had cytogenetic testing and classification, according to The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), was performed. Kaplan-Meier (KM) metastasis-free survival at 1-, 3-, 5-, and 10-years were explored.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The findings revealed TCGA Group A (n = 781; 49%), Group B (n = 215; 14%), Group C (n = 329; 21%), or Group D (n = 260; 16%). The median patient age at diagnosis was 60 years, sex was male in 51%, and race was White in 95%. A comparison (TCGA Group A vs Group B vs Group C vs Group D) revealed a difference in median patient age at tumour diagnosis (59 vs 59 vs 63 vs 65 years; p < 0.01), and initial visual acuity (20/20-20/50: 80% vs 68% vs 69% vs 64%; p < 0.01). The median tumour thickness was 4 mm, and the median diameter was 12 mm. A comparison (TCGA Group A vs Group B vs Group C vs Group D) revealed differences in median tumour thickness (3 vs 5 vs 6 vs 7 mm; p < 0.01), tumour diameter (10 vs 13 vs 13 vs 16 mm; p < 0.01), distance to foveola (3 vs 3 vs 4 vs 5 mm; p < 0.01), and distance to optic disc (3 vs 4 vs 5 vs 4 mm; p < 0.01). The KM metastasis-free survival estimates (TCGA Group A vs Group B vs Group C vs Group D) revealed differences at 1 year, 3 years, 5 years, and 10 years (p < 0.01) for any metastasis and specific survival rates at 5 years (96% vs 86% vs 62% vs 37%; p < 0.01), and 10 years (93% vs 78% vs 50% vs not available; p < 0.01) significantly decreased from Group A to Group D. By multivariate analysis, the hazard ratio for metastasis-free survival revealed differences in Groups B vs A (3.67), Groups C vs B (5.73), and Groups D vs C (3.20) (p < 0.01), as well as differences per tumour thickness (1.06) and diameter (1.13) (p < 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Genetic prognostication for metastatic risk from uveal melanoma using TCGA in this large cohort revealed that increasing TCGA category reduced the rate for metastasis-free survival.</p>","PeriodicalId":9606,"journal":{"name":"Canadian journal of ophthalmology. Journal canadien d'ophtalmologie","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian journal of ophthalmology. Journal canadien d'ophtalmologie","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcjo.2025.05.017","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Genetic testing for uveal melanoma and tumour size is important in prognostication.
Methods: A review of 1 585 patients with uveal melanoma who had cytogenetic testing and classification, according to The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), was performed. Kaplan-Meier (KM) metastasis-free survival at 1-, 3-, 5-, and 10-years were explored.
Results: The findings revealed TCGA Group A (n = 781; 49%), Group B (n = 215; 14%), Group C (n = 329; 21%), or Group D (n = 260; 16%). The median patient age at diagnosis was 60 years, sex was male in 51%, and race was White in 95%. A comparison (TCGA Group A vs Group B vs Group C vs Group D) revealed a difference in median patient age at tumour diagnosis (59 vs 59 vs 63 vs 65 years; p < 0.01), and initial visual acuity (20/20-20/50: 80% vs 68% vs 69% vs 64%; p < 0.01). The median tumour thickness was 4 mm, and the median diameter was 12 mm. A comparison (TCGA Group A vs Group B vs Group C vs Group D) revealed differences in median tumour thickness (3 vs 5 vs 6 vs 7 mm; p < 0.01), tumour diameter (10 vs 13 vs 13 vs 16 mm; p < 0.01), distance to foveola (3 vs 3 vs 4 vs 5 mm; p < 0.01), and distance to optic disc (3 vs 4 vs 5 vs 4 mm; p < 0.01). The KM metastasis-free survival estimates (TCGA Group A vs Group B vs Group C vs Group D) revealed differences at 1 year, 3 years, 5 years, and 10 years (p < 0.01) for any metastasis and specific survival rates at 5 years (96% vs 86% vs 62% vs 37%; p < 0.01), and 10 years (93% vs 78% vs 50% vs not available; p < 0.01) significantly decreased from Group A to Group D. By multivariate analysis, the hazard ratio for metastasis-free survival revealed differences in Groups B vs A (3.67), Groups C vs B (5.73), and Groups D vs C (3.20) (p < 0.01), as well as differences per tumour thickness (1.06) and diameter (1.13) (p < 0.01).
Conclusions: Genetic prognostication for metastatic risk from uveal melanoma using TCGA in this large cohort revealed that increasing TCGA category reduced the rate for metastasis-free survival.
背景:葡萄膜黑色素瘤的基因检测和肿瘤大小对预后很重要。方法:对1585例葡萄膜黑色素瘤患者进行细胞遗传学检测,并根据癌症基因组图谱(TCGA)进行分类。研究了1年、3年、5年和10年的Kaplan-Meier (KM)无转移生存率。结果:TCGA A组(n = 781;49%), B组(n = 215;14%), C组(n = 329;21%)或D组(n = 260;16%)。患者诊断时的中位年龄为60岁,51%为男性,95%为白人。一项比较(TCGA A组与B组、C组与D组)揭示了肿瘤诊断时患者年龄中位数的差异(59岁vs 59岁vs 63岁vs 65岁;P < 0.01),初始视敏度(20/20-20/50:80% vs 68% vs 69% vs 64%;P < 0.01)。肿瘤中位厚度为4mm,中位直径为12mm。比较(TCGA组A组与B组、C组与D组)显示中位肿瘤厚度的差异(3、5、6、7 mm;P < 0.01),肿瘤直径(10 vs 13 vs 13 vs 16 mm;P < 0.01),距中央凹距离(3 vs 3 vs 4 vs 5 mm;P < 0.01),视盘距离(3 vs 4 vs 5 vs 4 mm;P < 0.01)。KM无转移生存估计(TCGA组A组、B组、C组、D组)显示任何转移在1年、3年、5年和10年的差异(p < 0.01), 5年特异性生存率(96% vs 86% vs 62% vs 37%;P < 0.01), 10年(93% vs 78% vs 50% vs不可用;多因素分析显示,B组与A组无转移生存风险比(3.67)、C组与B组(5.73)、D组与C组(3.20)差异有统计学意义(p < 0.01),肿瘤厚度(1.06)和直径(1.13)差异有统计学意义(p < 0.01)。结论:在这个大型队列中,使用TCGA对葡萄膜黑色素瘤转移风险的遗传预测显示,TCGA类别增加会降低无转移生存率。
期刊介绍:
Official journal of the Canadian Ophthalmological Society.
The Canadian Journal of Ophthalmology (CJO) is the official journal of the Canadian Ophthalmological Society and is committed to timely publication of original, peer-reviewed ophthalmology and vision science articles.