Implant-free loop tenodesis compared to arthroscopic anchor tenodesis for the treatment of long head of biceps tendon disorders (LOOPTEN trial): study protocol for a multi-center non-inferiority randomized controlled trial.

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Leopold Henssler, Florian Zeman, Doruk Akgün, Kathi Thiele, Stephan Pauly, Stefan Greiner, Andreas Voss, Christian Gerhardt, Lars-Johannes Lehmann, Gunnar Huppertz, Magdalena Elsner, Volker Alt, Michael Koller, Maximilian Kerschbaum
{"title":"Implant-free loop tenodesis compared to arthroscopic anchor tenodesis for the treatment of long head of biceps tendon disorders (LOOPTEN trial): study protocol for a multi-center non-inferiority randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Leopold Henssler, Florian Zeman, Doruk Akgün, Kathi Thiele, Stephan Pauly, Stefan Greiner, Andreas Voss, Christian Gerhardt, Lars-Johannes Lehmann, Gunnar Huppertz, Magdalena Elsner, Volker Alt, Michael Koller, Maximilian Kerschbaum","doi":"10.1186/s12891-025-08818-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pathologies of the long head of the biceps (LHB) tendon are frequently seen as concomitant pathologies during arthroscopic surgery for rotator cuff injuries or the labroligamentous complex of the shoulder. Currently, there are two treatment options: Tenotomy is quick and easy to perform with low complications rates, but has limited functional results, especially in demanding patients; tenodesis of the tendon has shown beneficial cosmetic and functional results, but usually requires an implant for tendon-to-bone attachment and, therefore, carries the risk of implant-related complications. The implant-free loop tenodesis (LT) procedure was developed to combine the advantages of both treatment modalities and has shown promising functional and cosmetic results in a prospective pilot study. This study aims to establish the implant-free LT procedure versus arthroscopic anchor tenodesis (AAT) for the treatment of LHB pathologies during shoulder arthroscopy in terms of structural and functional outcome.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A national multi-center, two-arm, parallel-group, randomized, controlled, non-inferiority trial will be conducted. Patients are eligible for trial participation if they are at least 18 years of age and present to one of the five enrolling centers with LHB tendon-associated complaints and MRI-confirmed LHB tendinopathy, instability due to SLAP or pulley lesions, or partial rupture. Patients with current or previous shoulder injury that would interfere with post-treatment rehabilitation or study assessment will be excluded from study participation. Participating patients will be randomized 1:1 to receive either LT or AAT and will be followed up for 24 months after surgery. The primary endpoint will be the functional and cosmetic outcome as assessed by the biceps-specific LHB score at 12 months after surgery. Secondary outcomes include assessment of surgery-related complications, overall shoulder and arm function, and structural outcome as evaluated by ultrasound and an additional MRI scan at the final study visit.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The study will evaluate whether the implant-free loop tenodesis procedure is non-inferior to arthroscopic implant-based tenodesis in terms of functional and cosmetic results at 12 months post-treatment.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Trial was prospectively registered at the German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS) on 12<sup>th</sup> June 2024, Registration-ID DRKS00034361, https://drks.de/search/de/trial/DRKS00034361 .</p>","PeriodicalId":9189,"journal":{"name":"BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders","volume":"26 1","pages":"567"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12142869/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-025-08818-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Pathologies of the long head of the biceps (LHB) tendon are frequently seen as concomitant pathologies during arthroscopic surgery for rotator cuff injuries or the labroligamentous complex of the shoulder. Currently, there are two treatment options: Tenotomy is quick and easy to perform with low complications rates, but has limited functional results, especially in demanding patients; tenodesis of the tendon has shown beneficial cosmetic and functional results, but usually requires an implant for tendon-to-bone attachment and, therefore, carries the risk of implant-related complications. The implant-free loop tenodesis (LT) procedure was developed to combine the advantages of both treatment modalities and has shown promising functional and cosmetic results in a prospective pilot study. This study aims to establish the implant-free LT procedure versus arthroscopic anchor tenodesis (AAT) for the treatment of LHB pathologies during shoulder arthroscopy in terms of structural and functional outcome.

Methods: A national multi-center, two-arm, parallel-group, randomized, controlled, non-inferiority trial will be conducted. Patients are eligible for trial participation if they are at least 18 years of age and present to one of the five enrolling centers with LHB tendon-associated complaints and MRI-confirmed LHB tendinopathy, instability due to SLAP or pulley lesions, or partial rupture. Patients with current or previous shoulder injury that would interfere with post-treatment rehabilitation or study assessment will be excluded from study participation. Participating patients will be randomized 1:1 to receive either LT or AAT and will be followed up for 24 months after surgery. The primary endpoint will be the functional and cosmetic outcome as assessed by the biceps-specific LHB score at 12 months after surgery. Secondary outcomes include assessment of surgery-related complications, overall shoulder and arm function, and structural outcome as evaluated by ultrasound and an additional MRI scan at the final study visit.

Discussion: The study will evaluate whether the implant-free loop tenodesis procedure is non-inferior to arthroscopic implant-based tenodesis in terms of functional and cosmetic results at 12 months post-treatment.

Trial registration: Trial was prospectively registered at the German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS) on 12th June 2024, Registration-ID DRKS00034361, https://drks.de/search/de/trial/DRKS00034361 .

无植入物环形肌腱固定术与关节镜下锚定肌腱固定术治疗肱二头肌腱长头病变的比较(LOOPTEN试验):一项多中心非效性随机对照试验的研究方案。
背景:在肩袖损伤或肩关节韧带复合体的关节镜手术中,肱二头肌(LHB)肌腱长头病变常被视为伴随病变。目前,有两种治疗选择:肌腱切开术快速简便,并发症发生率低,但功能效果有限,特别是对要求苛刻的患者;肌腱固定术已显示出有益的美容和功能效果,但通常需要植入物来连接肌腱与骨,因此存在植入物相关并发症的风险。无植入物环式肌腱固定术(LT)结合了两种治疗方式的优点,并在一项前瞻性试点研究中显示出有希望的功能和美容效果。本研究旨在从结构和功能方面确定无植入物LT手术与关节镜下锚定肌腱固定术(AAT)治疗肩关节镜下LHB病变的疗效。方法:采用全国多中心、双臂、平行组、随机、对照、非劣效性试验。如果患者年龄在18岁以上,并且出现与LHB肌腱相关的投诉和mri证实的LHB肌腱病变,由于SLAP或滑轮病变引起的不稳定,或部分断裂,则有资格参加试验。当前或既往有肩伤且会影响治疗后康复或研究评估的患者将被排除在研究参与之外。参与研究的患者将以1:1的比例随机接受LT或AAT,并在术后随访24个月。主要终点将是术后12个月通过肱二头肌特异性LHB评分评估的功能和美容结果。次要结果包括手术相关并发症的评估,肩部和手臂的整体功能,以及在最后研究访问时通过超声和额外的MRI扫描评估的结构结果。讨论:该研究将评估在治疗后12个月,无植入物环式肌腱固定术在功能和美容效果方面是否优于关节镜下基于植入物的肌腱固定术。试验注册:试验于2024年6月12日在德国临床试验注册中心(DRKS)前瞻性注册,注册编号DRKS00034361, https://drks.de/search/de/trial/DRKS00034361。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 医学-风湿病学
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
8.70%
发文量
1017
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of musculoskeletal disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology. The scope of the Journal covers research into rheumatic diseases where the primary focus relates specifically to a component(s) of the musculoskeletal system.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信