Effectiveness and analgesic effect of local infiltration analgesia and femoral nerve block after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Wenjuan Ma, Dongmei Zhao, Pengcheng Li, Li Liu, Mingpeng Yang, Jian Zhang, Jian Li
{"title":"Effectiveness and analgesic effect of local infiltration analgesia and femoral nerve block after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Wenjuan Ma, Dongmei Zhao, Pengcheng Li, Li Liu, Mingpeng Yang, Jian Zhang, Jian Li","doi":"10.1186/s12891-025-08665-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) is frequently associated with moderate to severe postoperative pain, necessitating effective analgesic strategies to enhance patient comfort and facilitate recovery. Identifying effective pain management methods after ACLR is crucial. This study aims to explore the best analgesia method with the local infiltration analgesia (LIA) and femoral nerve block (FNB) after ACLR.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Cochrane Library databases, PubMed, MEDLINE and Embase were searched from inception to April 2024 with the following terms: \"anterior cruciate ligament\" AND \"reconstruction\" AND \"femoral nerve block\" AND \"local infiltration analgesia\" AND \"pain score\" AND \"morphine consumption\" AND \"analgesia duration\" AND \"complication\".</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 8 Level 1 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included in Meta analysis. The pain score of the FNB group was significantly lower than that of the LIA group at 8 to 12 h after the operation (MD = 1.78; 95% CI, [0.53, 3.03]; P = 0.005). There was no significant difference in pain scores between the two groups at 0 to 4, 4 to 8, and 12 to 24 h postoperatively. Within 24 h after surgery, there was no significant difference in intravenous morphine equivalent consumption between the two groups (MD = 3.76; 95% CI, [-0.82, 8.33]; P = 0.11). In terms of analgesic duration, there was also no significant difference between the two groups (MD = -3.03; 95% CI, [-7.34, 1.28]; P = 0.17). However, the incidence of nausea in the LIA group was higher than that in the FNB group (OR = 2.06; 95% CI, [1.03, 4.14]; P = 0.04).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The FNB is superior to LIA for intraoperative control of postoperative pain in the first 8 to 12 h after ACLR. But there was no significant difference in pain control at other time points, morphine consumption, and analgesic duration between the two groups within 24 h after surgery. The LIA group had a higher incidence of nausea within 24 h after surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":9189,"journal":{"name":"BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders","volume":"26 1","pages":"565"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12142901/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-025-08665-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) is frequently associated with moderate to severe postoperative pain, necessitating effective analgesic strategies to enhance patient comfort and facilitate recovery. Identifying effective pain management methods after ACLR is crucial. This study aims to explore the best analgesia method with the local infiltration analgesia (LIA) and femoral nerve block (FNB) after ACLR.

Methods: Cochrane Library databases, PubMed, MEDLINE and Embase were searched from inception to April 2024 with the following terms: "anterior cruciate ligament" AND "reconstruction" AND "femoral nerve block" AND "local infiltration analgesia" AND "pain score" AND "morphine consumption" AND "analgesia duration" AND "complication".

Results: A total of 8 Level 1 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included in Meta analysis. The pain score of the FNB group was significantly lower than that of the LIA group at 8 to 12 h after the operation (MD = 1.78; 95% CI, [0.53, 3.03]; P = 0.005). There was no significant difference in pain scores between the two groups at 0 to 4, 4 to 8, and 12 to 24 h postoperatively. Within 24 h after surgery, there was no significant difference in intravenous morphine equivalent consumption between the two groups (MD = 3.76; 95% CI, [-0.82, 8.33]; P = 0.11). In terms of analgesic duration, there was also no significant difference between the two groups (MD = -3.03; 95% CI, [-7.34, 1.28]; P = 0.17). However, the incidence of nausea in the LIA group was higher than that in the FNB group (OR = 2.06; 95% CI, [1.03, 4.14]; P = 0.04).

Conclusion: The FNB is superior to LIA for intraoperative control of postoperative pain in the first 8 to 12 h after ACLR. But there was no significant difference in pain control at other time points, morphine consumption, and analgesic duration between the two groups within 24 h after surgery. The LIA group had a higher incidence of nausea within 24 h after surgery.

前交叉韧带重建术后局部浸润镇痛和股神经阻滞的疗效和镇痛效果:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
背景:前交叉韧带重建(ACLR)经常伴有中度至重度术后疼痛,需要有效的镇痛策略来提高患者的舒适度并促进康复。确定ACLR后有效的疼痛管理方法至关重要。本研究旨在探讨ACLR术后局部浸润镇痛(LIA)联合股神经阻滞(FNB)的最佳镇痛方法。方法:检索Cochrane图书馆数据库、PubMed、MEDLINE和Embase数据库,检索时间自成立至2024年4月,检索词为:“前交叉韧带”、“重建”、“股神经阻滞”、“局部浸润性镇痛”、“疼痛评分”、“吗啡用量”、“镇痛持续时间”和“并发症”。结果:Meta分析共纳入8项1级随机对照试验(rct)。FNB组术后8 ~ 12 h疼痛评分明显低于LIA组(MD = 1.78;95% ci, [0.53, 3.03];p = 0.005)。两组患者术后0 ~ 4、4 ~ 8、12 ~ 24 h疼痛评分差异无统计学意义。术后24 h内,两组静脉吗啡当量用量比较差异无统计学意义(MD = 3.76;95% ci, [-0.82, 8.33];p = 0.11)。在镇痛持续时间方面,两组间差异无统计学意义(MD = -3.03;95% ci, [-7.34, 1.28];p = 0.17)。但LIA组恶心发生率高于FNB组(OR = 2.06;95% ci, [1.03, 4.14];p = 0.04)。结论:FNB在ACLR术后8 ~ 12 h的术中疼痛控制优于LIA。两组术后24 h内其他时间点疼痛控制、吗啡用量、镇痛时间差异无统计学意义。LIA组术后24小时内恶心发生率较高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 医学-风湿病学
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
8.70%
发文量
1017
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of musculoskeletal disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology. The scope of the Journal covers research into rheumatic diseases where the primary focus relates specifically to a component(s) of the musculoskeletal system.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信