Comparison of responses from different artificial intelligence-powered chatbots regarding the All-on-four dental implant concept.

IF 2.6 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Hasan Akpınar
{"title":"Comparison of responses from different artificial intelligence-powered chatbots regarding the All-on-four dental implant concept.","authors":"Hasan Akpınar","doi":"10.1186/s12903-025-06294-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Recent advancements in Artificial Intelligence (AI) have transformed the healthcare field, particularly through chatbots like ChatGPT, OpenEvidence, and MediSearch. These tools analyze complex data to aid clinical decision-making, enhancing efficiency in diagnosis, treatment planning, and patient management. When applied in the \"All-on-Four\" dental implant concept, AI facilitates immediate prosthetic restorations and meets the demand for expert guidance. This integration boosts the long-term success of surgical outcomes by providing real-time support and improving patient education and postoperative satisfaction. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of three AI-powered chatbots-ChatGPT 4.0, OpenEvidence, and MediSearch-in answering frequently asked questions regarding the All-on-Four dental implant concept.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This study investigated the response accuracy of three AI-powered chatbots to common queries about the All-on-Four dental implant concept. Using alsoasked.com, twenty pertinent questions-ten patient-focused and ten technical-were identified. Oral and maxillofacial surgeons evaluated the chatbot responses using a 5-point Likert scale. Statistical analysis was performed with the Kruskal-Wallis test, supplemented by pairwise Mann-Whitney U tests with Bonferroni correction, to assess the significance of differences among the chatbots' performances.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Kruskal-Wallis test showed statistically significant differences between the three chatbots for both patient and technical questions (p < 0.01). Pairwise comparisons were evaluated using the Mann-Whitney U test. While significant differences were found among each chatbot for patient questions, no significant difference was observed between ChatGPT and MediSearch for technical questions (p = 0.158). When comparing responses of the same chatbot to patient and technical questions, it was found that MediSearch performed better in technical questions (p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Advancements in technology have made AI-powered chatbots an inevitable influence in specialized medical fields such as Oral, Maxillofacial Surgery. Our findings indicate that these chatbots can provide valuable information for patients undergoing medical procedures and serve as a resource for healthcare professionals.</p>","PeriodicalId":9072,"journal":{"name":"BMC Oral Health","volume":"25 1","pages":"922"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12142943/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Oral Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-025-06294-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Recent advancements in Artificial Intelligence (AI) have transformed the healthcare field, particularly through chatbots like ChatGPT, OpenEvidence, and MediSearch. These tools analyze complex data to aid clinical decision-making, enhancing efficiency in diagnosis, treatment planning, and patient management. When applied in the "All-on-Four" dental implant concept, AI facilitates immediate prosthetic restorations and meets the demand for expert guidance. This integration boosts the long-term success of surgical outcomes by providing real-time support and improving patient education and postoperative satisfaction. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of three AI-powered chatbots-ChatGPT 4.0, OpenEvidence, and MediSearch-in answering frequently asked questions regarding the All-on-Four dental implant concept.

Method: This study investigated the response accuracy of three AI-powered chatbots to common queries about the All-on-Four dental implant concept. Using alsoasked.com, twenty pertinent questions-ten patient-focused and ten technical-were identified. Oral and maxillofacial surgeons evaluated the chatbot responses using a 5-point Likert scale. Statistical analysis was performed with the Kruskal-Wallis test, supplemented by pairwise Mann-Whitney U tests with Bonferroni correction, to assess the significance of differences among the chatbots' performances.

Results: The Kruskal-Wallis test showed statistically significant differences between the three chatbots for both patient and technical questions (p < 0.01). Pairwise comparisons were evaluated using the Mann-Whitney U test. While significant differences were found among each chatbot for patient questions, no significant difference was observed between ChatGPT and MediSearch for technical questions (p = 0.158). When comparing responses of the same chatbot to patient and technical questions, it was found that MediSearch performed better in technical questions (p < 0.001).

Conclusion: Advancements in technology have made AI-powered chatbots an inevitable influence in specialized medical fields such as Oral, Maxillofacial Surgery. Our findings indicate that these chatbots can provide valuable information for patients undergoing medical procedures and serve as a resource for healthcare professionals.

不同人工智能聊天机器人对All-on-four牙科植入概念的反应比较。
背景:人工智能(AI)的最新进展已经改变了医疗保健领域,特别是通过ChatGPT、OpenEvidence和MediSearch等聊天机器人。这些工具分析复杂的数据,以帮助临床决策,提高诊断、治疗计划和患者管理的效率。人工智能应用于“All-on-Four”种植体概念时,可以实现即时修复,满足专家指导的需求。这种整合通过提供实时支持和改善患者教育和术后满意度,促进了手术结果的长期成功。本研究旨在评估三种人工智能聊天机器人(chatgpt 4.0, OpenEvidence和medisearch)在回答有关All-on-Four牙科种植概念的常见问题方面的有效性。方法:本研究考察了三种人工智能聊天机器人对All-on-Four种植概念的常见问题的回答准确性。通过使用alsoasked.com网站,确定了20个相关问题——10个以患者为中心,10个技术问题。口腔颌面外科医生使用5分李克特量表评估聊天机器人的反应。采用Kruskal-Wallis检验进行统计分析,辅以辅以Bonferroni校正的两两Mann-Whitney U检验,以评估聊天机器人性能差异的显著性。结果:Kruskal-Wallis测试显示,三种聊天机器人在患者和技术问题上的差异具有统计学意义(p结论:技术的进步使人工智能聊天机器人在口腔、颌面外科等专业医疗领域产生了不可避免的影响。我们的研究结果表明,这些聊天机器人可以为接受医疗程序的患者提供有价值的信息,并作为医疗保健专业人员的资源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Oral Health
BMC Oral Health DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
6.90%
发文量
481
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Oral Health is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of disorders of the mouth, teeth and gums, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信