Research on ischemic stroke risk assessment based on CTA radiomics and machine learning.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Zhi-Li Li, Hong-Yu Yang, Xiao-Xiao Lv, Ya-Kun Zhang, Xin-Yu Zhu, Yu-Rou Zhang, Li Guo
{"title":"Research on ischemic stroke risk assessment based on CTA radiomics and machine learning.","authors":"Zhi-Li Li, Hong-Yu Yang, Xiao-Xiao Lv, Ya-Kun Zhang, Xin-Yu Zhu, Yu-Rou Zhang, Li Guo","doi":"10.1186/s12880-025-01697-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The study explores the value of a model constructed by integrating CTA-based carotid plaque radiomic features, clinical risk factors, and plaque imaging characteristics for prognosticating the risk of ischemic stroke.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from 123 patients with carotid atherosclerosis were analyzed and divided into stroke and asymptomatic groups based on DWI findings. Clinical information was collected, and plaque imaging characteristics were assessed to construct a traditional model. Radiomic features of carotid plaques were extracted using 3D-Slicer software to build a radiomics model. Logistic regression was applied in the training set to establish the traditional model, the radiomics model, and a combined model, which were then tested in the validation set. The prognostic ability of the three models for ischemic stroke was evaluated using ROC curves, while calibration curves, decision curve analysis, and clinical impact curves were used to assess the clinical utility of the models. Differences in AUC values between models were compared using the DeLong test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Hypertension, diabetes, elevated homocysteine (Hcy) concentrations, and plaque burden are independent risk factors for ischemic stroke and were used to establish the traditional model. Through Lasso regression, nine optimal features were selected to construct the radiomics model. ROC curve analysis showed that the AUC values of the three Logistic regression models were 0.766, 0.766, and 0.878 in the training set, and 0.798, 0.801, and 0.847 in the validation set. Calibration curves and decision curve analysis showed that the radiomics model and the combined model had higher accuracy and better fit in prognosticating the risk of ischemic stroke.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The radiomics model is slightly better than the traditional model in evaluating the risk of ischemic stroke, while the combined model has the best prognostic performance.</p>","PeriodicalId":9020,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medical Imaging","volume":"25 1","pages":"206"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12142908/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medical Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12880-025-01697-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The study explores the value of a model constructed by integrating CTA-based carotid plaque radiomic features, clinical risk factors, and plaque imaging characteristics for prognosticating the risk of ischemic stroke.

Methods: Data from 123 patients with carotid atherosclerosis were analyzed and divided into stroke and asymptomatic groups based on DWI findings. Clinical information was collected, and plaque imaging characteristics were assessed to construct a traditional model. Radiomic features of carotid plaques were extracted using 3D-Slicer software to build a radiomics model. Logistic regression was applied in the training set to establish the traditional model, the radiomics model, and a combined model, which were then tested in the validation set. The prognostic ability of the three models for ischemic stroke was evaluated using ROC curves, while calibration curves, decision curve analysis, and clinical impact curves were used to assess the clinical utility of the models. Differences in AUC values between models were compared using the DeLong test.

Results: Hypertension, diabetes, elevated homocysteine (Hcy) concentrations, and plaque burden are independent risk factors for ischemic stroke and were used to establish the traditional model. Through Lasso regression, nine optimal features were selected to construct the radiomics model. ROC curve analysis showed that the AUC values of the three Logistic regression models were 0.766, 0.766, and 0.878 in the training set, and 0.798, 0.801, and 0.847 in the validation set. Calibration curves and decision curve analysis showed that the radiomics model and the combined model had higher accuracy and better fit in prognosticating the risk of ischemic stroke.

Conclusions: The radiomics model is slightly better than the traditional model in evaluating the risk of ischemic stroke, while the combined model has the best prognostic performance.

基于CTA放射组学和机器学习的缺血性脑卒中风险评估研究。
背景:本研究探讨基于cta的颈动脉斑块放射学特征、临床危险因素和斑块影像学特征相结合构建的模型在预测缺血性脑卒中风险中的价值。方法:分析123例颈动脉粥样硬化患者的资料,根据DWI表现分为卒中组和无症状组。收集临床资料,评估斑块影像学特征,构建传统模型。利用3D-Slicer软件提取颈动脉斑块的放射组学特征,建立放射组学模型。在训练集中应用Logistic回归建立传统模型、放射组学模型和组合模型,并在验证集中进行检验。采用ROC曲线评价三种模型对缺血性卒中的预后能力,采用校正曲线、决策曲线分析和临床影响曲线评价模型的临床应用价值。采用DeLong检验比较模型间AUC值的差异。结果:高血压、糖尿病、高同型半胱氨酸(Hcy)浓度和斑块负担是缺血性脑卒中的独立危险因素,并用于建立传统模型。通过Lasso回归,选择9个最优特征构建放射组学模型。ROC曲线分析显示,三种Logistic回归模型在训练集中的AUC值分别为0.766、0.766和0.878,在验证集中的AUC值分别为0.798、0.801和0.847。校正曲线和决策曲线分析表明,放射组学模型和联合模型在预测缺血性脑卒中风险方面具有更高的准确性和更好的拟合性。结论:放射组学模型在评估缺血性脑卒中风险方面略优于传统模型,而联合模型的预后效果最好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Medical Imaging
BMC Medical Imaging RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
3.70%
发文量
198
审稿时长
27 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Medical Imaging is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in the development, evaluation, and use of imaging techniques and image processing tools to diagnose and manage disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信