The impact of tiered soft drink taxes in Europe on mean sales-weighted sugar content of soft drinks: a quasi-experimental study.

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Anna Leibinger, Oliver Huizinga, Karl Emmert-Fees, Sara Pedron, Michael Laxy, Eva Rehfuess, Jacob Burns, Peter von Philipsborn
{"title":"The impact of tiered soft drink taxes in Europe on mean sales-weighted sugar content of soft drinks: a quasi-experimental study.","authors":"Anna Leibinger, Oliver Huizinga, Karl Emmert-Fees, Sara Pedron, Michael Laxy, Eva Rehfuess, Jacob Burns, Peter von Philipsborn","doi":"10.1186/s12889-025-23331-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>High sugar intake from soft drinks is associated with increased risk of non-communicable diseases. Tiered soft drink taxes applying higher tax rates on beverages with higher sugar content have been used to incentivize producers to reduce sugar content of soft drinks. This study assesses the impact of tiered soft drink taxes in four European countries on the sugar content of soft drinks.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used annual sales data from 12 countries from Euromonitor International for 2009 to 2022 to estimate the effect of tiered soft drink taxes in France, Ireland, Portugal, and the United Kingdom (UK) on soft drinks' mean annual sales-weighted sugar content. We conducted a quasi-experimental study, applying a synthetic control approach in which we used a weighted combination of eight European countries without a soft drink tax serving as control for the four intervention countries.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>France, Portugal, and the UK exhibited negative estimated treatment effects, indicating a reduction in average sugar content in these countries. The UK demonstrated the largest estimated effect (-1.7 g sugar/100 ml; 95%-CI: -2.6; -0.8), followed by France (-0.6; 95%-CI: -1.7; 0.4) and Portugal (-0.3; 95%-CI: -1.5; 1.0). Ireland (0.4; 95%-CI: -0.8; 1.7) displayed effects in the opposite direction. Results of the sensitivity analyses indicate that results are robust concerning assumptions underlying the study design and analysis strategy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Varying effect sizes emphasize the importance of considering specific tax design, co-interventions and contextual factors when implementing tax policies. Further research could help to shed light on these variations and to achieve a higher level of accuracy and precision in the effect estimates.</p>","PeriodicalId":9039,"journal":{"name":"BMC Public Health","volume":"25 1","pages":"2106"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12142870/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-025-23331-w","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: High sugar intake from soft drinks is associated with increased risk of non-communicable diseases. Tiered soft drink taxes applying higher tax rates on beverages with higher sugar content have been used to incentivize producers to reduce sugar content of soft drinks. This study assesses the impact of tiered soft drink taxes in four European countries on the sugar content of soft drinks.

Methods: We used annual sales data from 12 countries from Euromonitor International for 2009 to 2022 to estimate the effect of tiered soft drink taxes in France, Ireland, Portugal, and the United Kingdom (UK) on soft drinks' mean annual sales-weighted sugar content. We conducted a quasi-experimental study, applying a synthetic control approach in which we used a weighted combination of eight European countries without a soft drink tax serving as control for the four intervention countries.

Results: France, Portugal, and the UK exhibited negative estimated treatment effects, indicating a reduction in average sugar content in these countries. The UK demonstrated the largest estimated effect (-1.7 g sugar/100 ml; 95%-CI: -2.6; -0.8), followed by France (-0.6; 95%-CI: -1.7; 0.4) and Portugal (-0.3; 95%-CI: -1.5; 1.0). Ireland (0.4; 95%-CI: -0.8; 1.7) displayed effects in the opposite direction. Results of the sensitivity analyses indicate that results are robust concerning assumptions underlying the study design and analysis strategy.

Conclusions: Varying effect sizes emphasize the importance of considering specific tax design, co-interventions and contextual factors when implementing tax policies. Further research could help to shed light on these variations and to achieve a higher level of accuracy and precision in the effect estimates.

欧洲软饮料分层税对软饮料平均销售加权含糖量的影响:一项准实验研究。
背景:软饮料中的高糖摄入与非传染性疾病风险增加有关。软饮料分级税对含糖量高的饮料征收更高的税率,以激励生产商减少软饮料的含糖量。本研究评估了四个欧洲国家对软饮料含糖量的分级软饮料税的影响。方法:我们使用欧睿国际2009年至2022年12个国家的年销售数据来估计法国、爱尔兰、葡萄牙和英国的分层软饮料税对软饮料平均年销售加权糖含量的影响。我们进行了一项准实验研究,采用一种综合控制方法,其中我们使用八个欧洲国家的加权组合,不征收软饮料税,作为四个干预国家的控制。结果:法国、葡萄牙和英国表现出负面的估计治疗效果,表明这些国家的平均糖含量减少。据估计,英国的影响最大(每100毫升-1.7克糖;95% ci: -2.6;-0.8),其次是法国(-0.6;95% ci: -1.7;0.4)和葡萄牙(-0.3;95% ci: -1.5;1.0)。爱尔兰(0.4;95% ci: -0.8;1.7)表现出相反方向的效应。敏感性分析的结果表明,有关研究设计和分析策略的假设的结果是稳健的。结论:不同的效应大小强调了在实施税收政策时考虑特定税收设计、联合干预和背景因素的重要性。进一步的研究可以帮助阐明这些变化,并在效应估计中达到更高的准确性和精确度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Public Health
BMC Public Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
4.40%
发文量
2108
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: BMC Public Health is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on the epidemiology of disease and the understanding of all aspects of public health. The journal has a special focus on the social determinants of health, the environmental, behavioral, and occupational correlates of health and disease, and the impact of health policies, practices and interventions on the community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信