Systematic description of the development of a complex health intervention of information and support in a new pregnancy after pregnancy loss.

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Emily Koert, Sarah Fredsted Villadsen, Rebecca Mackel, Helene Cagara, Tanja Schlaikjær Hartwig, Henriette Svarre Nielsen, Lone Schmidt
{"title":"Systematic description of the development of a complex health intervention of information and support in a new pregnancy after pregnancy loss.","authors":"Emily Koert, Sarah Fredsted Villadsen, Rebecca Mackel, Helene Cagara, Tanja Schlaikjær Hartwig, Henriette Svarre Nielsen, Lone Schmidt","doi":"10.1186/s12889-025-22163-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In this paper, we present a systematic description of the development method of a complex health intervention (PREGAFTERPL) for couples with prior pregnancy loss (PL) to provide information and support in a new pregnancy using co-production and prototyping.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A three-stage method described by Hawkins et al. and informed by O'Cathain et al. was tested to develop the PREGAFTERPL intervention for couples over a 24 month period. We used a combination of the partnership and theory and evidence based approaches of O'Cathain's nine categories of intervention development approaches. The stages included: (1) Evidence review, needs assessment and stakeholder consultation, (2) Co-production with stakeholders (health care professionals, researchers and couples with prior pregnancy loss) via consultations and focus groups, and (3) Prototyping using focus group and online survey. The three stage co-production and prototyping process was iterative and cumulative with refinements occurring at each stage before progressing to the next stage.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Using the three-stage method we co-produced and prototype-tested the intervention content and delivery methods for the PREGAFTERPL intervention. In stage 1 we identified the needs of pregnant women and their partners and potential content of the intervention to include information, coping strategies and tools and resources. In stage 2, multiple refinements of the content and delivery resulted from an action research cycle with input from stakeholders including the decision to divide the tool into one for women and another for partners. Initial prototyping in stage 3 showed that the tools were acceptable, useful and relevant and it was suitable to proceed with full-scale feasibility testing, implementation and evaluation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This framework presented in the PREGAFTERPL case study provides a practical example on how to co-produce and prototype a complex healthcare intervention in collaboration with key stakeholders including health care professionals and couples with prior pregnancy loss in order to meet an unmet need for information and support in a new pregnancy after PL. Through such case study, we hope that future researchers will be inspired to include co-production in their own intervention development projects by seeing that it is valuable and can be feasible and done with limited resources.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Not applicable.</p>","PeriodicalId":9039,"journal":{"name":"BMC Public Health","volume":"25 1","pages":"2097"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-025-22163-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In this paper, we present a systematic description of the development method of a complex health intervention (PREGAFTERPL) for couples with prior pregnancy loss (PL) to provide information and support in a new pregnancy using co-production and prototyping.

Methods: A three-stage method described by Hawkins et al. and informed by O'Cathain et al. was tested to develop the PREGAFTERPL intervention for couples over a 24 month period. We used a combination of the partnership and theory and evidence based approaches of O'Cathain's nine categories of intervention development approaches. The stages included: (1) Evidence review, needs assessment and stakeholder consultation, (2) Co-production with stakeholders (health care professionals, researchers and couples with prior pregnancy loss) via consultations and focus groups, and (3) Prototyping using focus group and online survey. The three stage co-production and prototyping process was iterative and cumulative with refinements occurring at each stage before progressing to the next stage.

Results: Using the three-stage method we co-produced and prototype-tested the intervention content and delivery methods for the PREGAFTERPL intervention. In stage 1 we identified the needs of pregnant women and their partners and potential content of the intervention to include information, coping strategies and tools and resources. In stage 2, multiple refinements of the content and delivery resulted from an action research cycle with input from stakeholders including the decision to divide the tool into one for women and another for partners. Initial prototyping in stage 3 showed that the tools were acceptable, useful and relevant and it was suitable to proceed with full-scale feasibility testing, implementation and evaluation.

Conclusions: This framework presented in the PREGAFTERPL case study provides a practical example on how to co-produce and prototype a complex healthcare intervention in collaboration with key stakeholders including health care professionals and couples with prior pregnancy loss in order to meet an unmet need for information and support in a new pregnancy after PL. Through such case study, we hope that future researchers will be inspired to include co-production in their own intervention development projects by seeing that it is valuable and can be feasible and done with limited resources.

Trial registration: Not applicable.

系统的描述了一种复杂的健康干预信息和支持的发展,在一个新的怀孕后的妊娠丢失。
背景:在本文中,我们提出了一个复杂的健康干预(PREGAFTERPL)的开发方法的系统描述,以提供信息和支持,在新的怀孕使用联合生产和原型。方法:采用Hawkins等人描述并由O’cathain等人告知的三阶段方法,对24个月的夫妻进行PREGAFTERPL干预。我们结合了O’cathain的九种干预发展方法中的伙伴关系、理论和基于证据的方法。研究阶段包括:(1)证据审查、需求评估和利益相关者咨询;(2)通过咨询和焦点小组与利益相关者(卫生保健专业人员、研究人员和有过流产经历的夫妇)共同制作;(3)利用焦点小组和在线调查进行原型设计。三个阶段的联合制作和原型制作过程是迭代和累积的,在进入下一阶段之前,每个阶段都有改进。结果:采用三阶段法,我们共同制作和原型测试了PREGAFTERPL干预的干预内容和给药方法。在第一阶段,我们确定了孕妇及其伴侣的需求和干预的潜在内容,包括信息、应对策略、工具和资源。在第二阶段,根据利益攸关方的投入,行动研究周期对内容和交付进行了多次改进,包括决定将工具分为一种用于妇女,另一种用于伙伴。阶段3的初始原型显示,这些工具是可接受的、有用的和相关的,适合进行全面的可行性测试、实施和评估。结论:PREGAFTERPL案例研究中提出的这个框架提供了一个实际的例子,说明如何与主要利益相关者(包括医疗保健专业人员和先前怀孕失败的夫妇)合作,共同生产和原型化复杂的医疗保健干预措施,以满足PL后新怀孕中未满足的信息和支持需求。我们希望未来的研究人员能够受到启发,在他们自己的干预开发项目中纳入合作生产,因为这是有价值的、可行的,而且资源有限。试验注册:不适用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Public Health
BMC Public Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
4.40%
发文量
2108
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: BMC Public Health is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on the epidemiology of disease and the understanding of all aspects of public health. The journal has a special focus on the social determinants of health, the environmental, behavioral, and occupational correlates of health and disease, and the impact of health policies, practices and interventions on the community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信