A concept mapping approach to explore the perceived facilitating factors in shifting sedentary behavior into (more) physical activity: perspectives of healthcare professionals versus sedentary and/or inactive adults.
IF 3.5 2区 医学Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Iris Willems, Vera Verbestel, Teatske Altenburg, Dorothea Dumuid, Patrick Calders, Marieke De Craemer
{"title":"A concept mapping approach to explore the perceived facilitating factors in shifting sedentary behavior into (more) physical activity: perspectives of healthcare professionals versus sedentary and/or inactive adults.","authors":"Iris Willems, Vera Verbestel, Teatske Altenburg, Dorothea Dumuid, Patrick Calders, Marieke De Craemer","doi":"10.1186/s12889-025-23223-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Healthcare professionals (HCPs) such as Physical Activity on Prescription (PAP)-coaches and physiotherapists might play a crucial role in activating sedentary and/or inactive adults, which in turn might benefit their health. We aimed to explore the perceived facilitating factors to shift sedentary behavior (SB) into more physical activity (PA) comparing two perspectives 1) sedentary and/or inactive adults and 2) HCPs in their role to activate these adults.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A mixed method approach, i.e. concept mapping, was used to explore the facilitating factors among 1) HCPs (n = 10) and 2) adults (n = 40). During a brainstorm, perceived facilitating factors were gathered in response to one seeding statement 'what help(s) you/your clients to shift SB into (more) PA?'. Thereafter, all answers were sorted by relatedness into different piles and each answer was rated on effectiveness, feasibility, changeability and enjoyment (5-point Likert scale). Data analysis was done via RCMap.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Clusters identified by both HCPs and adults included 'social networks', 'everyday activities as opportunities for PA', 'awareness of PA benefits', 'motivation regarding PA', 'integration of PA into daily routines', 'goal-setting to facilitate PA', 'environmental facilities', 'financial resources', and 'technology, digital tools and external tools to facilitate PA'. Each group created unique clusters such as factors related to the 'work environment' by adults and factors related to 'tailored support to facilitate PA' by HCPs. The average rating for each cluster was higher for HCPs compared to adults for effectiveness (4/5 vs 3.5/5), feasibility (3.8/5 vs 3.1/5), and changeability (3.7/5 vs 3.2/5).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>HCPs and sedentary and/or inactive adults identified factors at the intra- and interpersonal level which were rated as feasible, effective and changeable, as well as factors at the responsibility of external stakeholders such as employers or policy makers. These results highlight that future interventions aimed at shifting SB into PA include a multilevel challenge.</p>","PeriodicalId":9039,"journal":{"name":"BMC Public Health","volume":"25 1","pages":"2094"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12139191/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-025-23223-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: Healthcare professionals (HCPs) such as Physical Activity on Prescription (PAP)-coaches and physiotherapists might play a crucial role in activating sedentary and/or inactive adults, which in turn might benefit their health. We aimed to explore the perceived facilitating factors to shift sedentary behavior (SB) into more physical activity (PA) comparing two perspectives 1) sedentary and/or inactive adults and 2) HCPs in their role to activate these adults.
Methods: A mixed method approach, i.e. concept mapping, was used to explore the facilitating factors among 1) HCPs (n = 10) and 2) adults (n = 40). During a brainstorm, perceived facilitating factors were gathered in response to one seeding statement 'what help(s) you/your clients to shift SB into (more) PA?'. Thereafter, all answers were sorted by relatedness into different piles and each answer was rated on effectiveness, feasibility, changeability and enjoyment (5-point Likert scale). Data analysis was done via RCMap.
Results: Clusters identified by both HCPs and adults included 'social networks', 'everyday activities as opportunities for PA', 'awareness of PA benefits', 'motivation regarding PA', 'integration of PA into daily routines', 'goal-setting to facilitate PA', 'environmental facilities', 'financial resources', and 'technology, digital tools and external tools to facilitate PA'. Each group created unique clusters such as factors related to the 'work environment' by adults and factors related to 'tailored support to facilitate PA' by HCPs. The average rating for each cluster was higher for HCPs compared to adults for effectiveness (4/5 vs 3.5/5), feasibility (3.8/5 vs 3.1/5), and changeability (3.7/5 vs 3.2/5).
Conclusions: HCPs and sedentary and/or inactive adults identified factors at the intra- and interpersonal level which were rated as feasible, effective and changeable, as well as factors at the responsibility of external stakeholders such as employers or policy makers. These results highlight that future interventions aimed at shifting SB into PA include a multilevel challenge.
目的:医疗保健专业人员(HCPs),如处方体力活动(PAP)教练和物理治疗师可能在激活久坐和/或不运动的成年人方面发挥关键作用,这反过来可能有益于他们的健康。我们的目的是探讨将久坐行为(SB)转变为更多身体活动(PA)的感知促进因素,比较两种观点:1)久坐和/或不运动的成年人和2)HCPs在激活这些成年人中的作用。方法:采用混合方法,即概念图法,在1)HCPs (n = 10)和2)成人(n = 40)中探讨促进因素。在头脑风暴过程中,我们收集了一些可感知的促进因素,以回应“您/您的客户如何将SB转变为(更多)PA?”这一播种性陈述。然后,将所有答案根据相关性进行分类,并对每个答案的有效性、可行性、可变性和享受度进行评分(5分李克特量表)。数据分析通过RCMap完成。结果:HCPs和成人都确定的集群包括“社交网络”、“日常活动作为PA的机会”、“对PA利益的认识”、“关于PA的动机”、“将PA融入日常生活”、“制定目标以促进PA”、“环境设施”、“财务资源”和“技术、数字工具和外部工具促进PA”。每个小组都创建了独特的集群,例如与成年人的“工作环境”相关的因素和与hcp的“定制支持以促进PA”相关的因素。与成人相比,HCPs在有效性(4/5 vs 3.5/5)、可行性(3.8/5 vs 3.1/5)和可变性(3.7/5 vs 3.2/5)方面的每组平均评分更高。结论:HCPs和久坐和/或不运动的成年人确定了内部和人际层面的因素,这些因素被评为可行、有效和可变的,以及外部利益相关者(如雇主或政策制定者)的责任因素。这些结果表明,未来旨在将SB转化为PA的干预措施包括一个多层次的挑战。
期刊介绍:
BMC Public Health is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on the epidemiology of disease and the understanding of all aspects of public health. The journal has a special focus on the social determinants of health, the environmental, behavioral, and occupational correlates of health and disease, and the impact of health policies, practices and interventions on the community.