Racial, Ethnic and Socioeconomic Disparities in Celiac Disease Trials: A Systematic Review of Participant Diversity and Trial Site Distribution.

IF 8 1区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Anthony Kerbage, Jack Loesch, Claire L Jansson-Knodell, Neil Nero, Alberto Rubio-Tapia
{"title":"Racial, Ethnic and Socioeconomic Disparities in Celiac Disease Trials: A Systematic Review of Participant Diversity and Trial Site Distribution.","authors":"Anthony Kerbage, Jack Loesch, Claire L Jansson-Knodell, Neil Nero, Alberto Rubio-Tapia","doi":"10.14309/ajg.0000000000003580","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/aim: </strong>Celiac disease (CeD) has traditionally been regarded as a condition affecting non-Hispanic Whites although 10% of cases occur in underrepresented minorities. There is growing demand for randomized clinical trials (RCTs) investigating CeD treatments, however minority participation in CeD trials has not been examined. This study aimed to investigate demographic and socioeconomic diversity in RCTs for treatments of CeD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a systematic review of RCTs investigating treatments for CeD in the United States (US). We included studies on serology or biopsy confirmed CeD conducted domestically. First, participant demographics were analyzed. Second, trial sites were mapped, and county-level demographic and socioeconomic characteristics were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 10 RCTs (2011-2023) with 319 participants (mean age: 40.9 years); 70.2% were women. Race was reported in 9/10 trials, with 99.6% White and no Black, Asian, or Native American participants. Ethnicity was reported in 4/10 trials, with 8.6% Hispanic. Counties without trial sites were more rural, had smaller populations, higher poverty rates, lower incomes, lower educational attainment, and higher Area Deprivation Index scores, indicating greater socioeconomic deprivation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite efforts to improve minority inclusion in RCTs, significant disparities persist in CeD trials, with minimal racial and ethnic diversity. As demand for pharmacologic treatments grows, future trials must address these gaps through diverse recruitment, equitable site distribution, and targeted outreach to ensure emerging therapies are generalizable and accessible to all patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":7608,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Gastroenterology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14309/ajg.0000000000003580","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/aim: Celiac disease (CeD) has traditionally been regarded as a condition affecting non-Hispanic Whites although 10% of cases occur in underrepresented minorities. There is growing demand for randomized clinical trials (RCTs) investigating CeD treatments, however minority participation in CeD trials has not been examined. This study aimed to investigate demographic and socioeconomic diversity in RCTs for treatments of CeD.

Methods: We conducted a systematic review of RCTs investigating treatments for CeD in the United States (US). We included studies on serology or biopsy confirmed CeD conducted domestically. First, participant demographics were analyzed. Second, trial sites were mapped, and county-level demographic and socioeconomic characteristics were compared.

Results: We identified 10 RCTs (2011-2023) with 319 participants (mean age: 40.9 years); 70.2% were women. Race was reported in 9/10 trials, with 99.6% White and no Black, Asian, or Native American participants. Ethnicity was reported in 4/10 trials, with 8.6% Hispanic. Counties without trial sites were more rural, had smaller populations, higher poverty rates, lower incomes, lower educational attainment, and higher Area Deprivation Index scores, indicating greater socioeconomic deprivation.

Conclusion: Despite efforts to improve minority inclusion in RCTs, significant disparities persist in CeD trials, with minimal racial and ethnic diversity. As demand for pharmacologic treatments grows, future trials must address these gaps through diverse recruitment, equitable site distribution, and targeted outreach to ensure emerging therapies are generalizable and accessible to all patients.

乳糜泻试验中的种族、民族和社会经济差异:参与者多样性和试验地点分布的系统综述。
背景/目的:乳糜泻(CeD)传统上被认为是一种影响非西班牙裔白人的疾病,尽管10%的病例发生在代表性不足的少数民族中。对研究CeD治疗的随机临床试验(RCTs)的需求越来越大,然而少数人参与CeD试验的情况尚未得到调查。本研究旨在调查随机对照试验治疗CeD的人口统计学和社会经济多样性。方法:我们对美国研究CeD治疗方法的随机对照试验进行了系统回顾。我们纳入了国内进行的血清学或活检证实CeD的研究。首先,对参与者进行人口统计分析。其次,绘制试验点分布图,比较县级人口和社会经济特征。结果:我们纳入了10项随机对照试验(2011-2023),共有319名参与者(平均年龄:40.9岁);70.2%为女性。9/10的试验报告了种族,其中99.6%是白人,没有黑人、亚洲人或美洲原住民参与者。10项试验中有4项报告了种族,其中8.6%为西班牙裔。没有试验点的县更多是农村地区,人口较少,贫困率较高,收入较低,受教育程度较低,区域剥夺指数得分较高,表明社会经济剥夺程度较高。结论:尽管我们努力提高随机对照试验中少数民族的纳入,但在CeD试验中仍然存在显著差异,种族和民族多样性极小。随着对药物治疗需求的增长,未来的试验必须通过多样化的招募、公平的地点分布和有针对性的外展来解决这些差距,以确保新兴疗法的推广和对所有患者的可及性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American Journal of Gastroenterology
American Journal of Gastroenterology 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
11.40
自引率
5.10%
发文量
458
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: Published on behalf of the American College of Gastroenterology (ACG), The American Journal of Gastroenterology (AJG) stands as the foremost clinical journal in the fields of gastroenterology and hepatology. AJG offers practical and professional support to clinicians addressing the most prevalent gastroenterological disorders in patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信