Optimizing the cost-effective evaluation of gastroesophageal reflux by typical symptom phenotypes after failure of empiric acid suppression trial.

IF 8 1区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Eric D Shah, C Prakash Gyawali, Walter W Chan
{"title":"Optimizing the cost-effective evaluation of gastroesophageal reflux by typical symptom phenotypes after failure of empiric acid suppression trial.","authors":"Eric D Shah, C Prakash Gyawali, Walter W Chan","doi":"10.14309/ajg.0000000000003576","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Concern for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is the most common reason to consult gastroenterology. We aimed to optimize routine GERD evaluation on cost-effectiveness according to the dominant typical symptom among patients with persistent symptoms failing empiric proton pump inhibitors (PPI).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We developed a decision analytic model evaluating all permutations of GERD diagnostics including empiric trials of PPI optimization or discontinuation, upper endoscopy, wireless pH-monitoring, and pH-impedance monitoring. The model was applied to patients with heartburn, regurgitation, and chest pain in general gastroenterology to identify the appropriate combination and order of testing from insurer and patient perspectives. Health outcomes were informed by systematic reviews of clinical trials. Cost outcomes were informed by Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services and commercial datasets and national observational studies. The time horizon was one year and willingness-to-pay threshold was $100,000/quality-adjusted-life-year (QALY) gained.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For patients with typical persistent GERD symptoms failing empiric PPI, routine up-front ambulatory reflux testing saved $2,500-$4,500 compared to endoscopy alone when no erosive esophagitis is found. The most cost-effective initial ambulatory reflux test was 96-hour wireless pH-monitoring for patients with heartburn and chest pain and 24-hour pH-impedance monitoring for patients with regurgitation, both performed OFF-PPI. Adding ON-PPI pH-impedance monitoring optimized cost-effectiveness for patients with documented evidence of GERD and PPI-refractory symptoms. Patient and insurer perspectives aligned on these optimal diagnostic strategies.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Compared to a one-size-fits-all strategy, a tailored approach based on Lyon 2.0 optimizes cost-effective evaluation and management of GERD by phenotyping the appropriate diagnostics to dominant symptom.</p>","PeriodicalId":7608,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Gastroenterology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14309/ajg.0000000000003576","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Concern for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is the most common reason to consult gastroenterology. We aimed to optimize routine GERD evaluation on cost-effectiveness according to the dominant typical symptom among patients with persistent symptoms failing empiric proton pump inhibitors (PPI).

Methods: We developed a decision analytic model evaluating all permutations of GERD diagnostics including empiric trials of PPI optimization or discontinuation, upper endoscopy, wireless pH-monitoring, and pH-impedance monitoring. The model was applied to patients with heartburn, regurgitation, and chest pain in general gastroenterology to identify the appropriate combination and order of testing from insurer and patient perspectives. Health outcomes were informed by systematic reviews of clinical trials. Cost outcomes were informed by Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services and commercial datasets and national observational studies. The time horizon was one year and willingness-to-pay threshold was $100,000/quality-adjusted-life-year (QALY) gained.

Results: For patients with typical persistent GERD symptoms failing empiric PPI, routine up-front ambulatory reflux testing saved $2,500-$4,500 compared to endoscopy alone when no erosive esophagitis is found. The most cost-effective initial ambulatory reflux test was 96-hour wireless pH-monitoring for patients with heartburn and chest pain and 24-hour pH-impedance monitoring for patients with regurgitation, both performed OFF-PPI. Adding ON-PPI pH-impedance monitoring optimized cost-effectiveness for patients with documented evidence of GERD and PPI-refractory symptoms. Patient and insurer perspectives aligned on these optimal diagnostic strategies.

Discussion: Compared to a one-size-fits-all strategy, a tailored approach based on Lyon 2.0 optimizes cost-effective evaluation and management of GERD by phenotyping the appropriate diagnostics to dominant symptom.

胃酸抑制试验失败后典型症状表型优化胃食管反流的成本效益评价。
简介:担心胃食管反流病(GERD)是最常见的原因咨询胃肠病学。我们的目的是根据经验性质子泵抑制剂(PPI)无效的持续症状患者的主要典型症状,优化常规GERD评估的成本-效果。方法:我们建立了一个决策分析模型,评估所有胃食管反流诊断的排列,包括PPI优化或停止、上颌内窥镜检查、无线ph监测和ph阻抗监测的经验试验。该模型应用于胃灼热、反流和胸痛的普通胃肠病学患者,从保险公司和患者的角度确定适当的测试组合和顺序。临床试验的系统评价为健康结果提供了信息。成本结果由医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心、商业数据集和国家观察性研究提供。时间范围为一年,支付意愿阈值为10万美元/质量调整生命年(QALY)。结果:对于没有经验性PPI的典型持续性胃食管反流症状的患者,在没有发现糜糜性食管炎的情况下,与单独进行内窥镜检查相比,常规的前期动态反流检查节省了2500 - 4500美元。最具成本效益的初始动态反流试验是对烧心和胸痛患者进行96小时无线ph监测,对反流患者进行24小时ph阻抗监测,两者均采用OFF-PPI。增加ON-PPI ph阻抗监测对有证据证明有胃食管反流和ppi难愈症状的患者优化了成本效益。患者和保险公司的观点与这些最佳诊断策略一致。讨论:与一刀切的策略相比,基于Lyon 2.0的定制方法通过对主要症状进行适当的诊断,优化了GERD的成本效益评估和管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American Journal of Gastroenterology
American Journal of Gastroenterology 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
11.40
自引率
5.10%
发文量
458
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: Published on behalf of the American College of Gastroenterology (ACG), The American Journal of Gastroenterology (AJG) stands as the foremost clinical journal in the fields of gastroenterology and hepatology. AJG offers practical and professional support to clinicians addressing the most prevalent gastroenterological disorders in patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信