Enhanced Scar Reduction with Triamcinolone Acetonide and Botulinum Toxin A Combination Therapy Compared to Botulinum Toxin A Monotherapy: A Translational Pilot Study.

IF 3 2区 医学 Q1 SURGERY
Shu-Hung Huang, Wen-Chin Wang, Hui-Yu Chuang, Shih-Ming Yang, Shang-Yu Yang, Sheng-Hua Wu
{"title":"Enhanced Scar Reduction with Triamcinolone Acetonide and Botulinum Toxin A Combination Therapy Compared to Botulinum Toxin A Monotherapy: A Translational Pilot Study.","authors":"Shu-Hung Huang, Wen-Chin Wang, Hui-Yu Chuang, Shih-Ming Yang, Shang-Yu Yang, Sheng-Hua Wu","doi":"10.1093/asj/sjaf094","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The efficacy of combining triamcinolone acetonide (TAC) and botulinum toxin type A (BTX-A) in treating hypertrophic scars and keloids remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This pilot study aimed to compare the clinical efficacy of BTX-A monotherapy and TAC + BTX-A combination therapy in improving scar conditions and to investigate potential mechanisms using a rat burn scar model.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study was conducted between March 2022 and December 2024. Each patient's scar was randomly divided into two equal parts, with one part receiving TAC + BTX-A and the other BTX-A alone for three sessions at four-week intervals. Scar thickness was measured using calipers, and the Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS) was used to assess scar condition. Pain and itchiness were evaluated using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) and Visual Analog Scale (VAS), respectively, before each intervention (V1, V2, V3) and four weeks after the last session (V4). In the animal study, rats with burn scars were assigned to five groups: sham, untreated burn, TAC, BTX-A, and TAC + BTX-A. Scar thickness and expressions of α-SMA, TGF-β, CTGF, collagen I/III, laminin, and fibronectin were analyzed histologically.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Clinically, both therapies reduced scar thickness, VSS, NRS, and VAS scores. However, combination therapy showed superior reductions in scar thickness (V2-V4) and VSS scores (V3, V4) compared to BTX-A monotherapy. No significant differences were observed in NRS and VAS scores. The animal study confirmed that combination therapy more effectively reduced scar thickness, TGF-β and CTGF levels, and the collagen I/III ratio, while increasing the laminin/fibronectin ratio.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>TAC + BTX-A combination therapy enhances scar reduction by more effectively suppressing fibroblast proliferation and activation through TGF-β and CTGF downregulation, promoting scar remodeling.</p>","PeriodicalId":7728,"journal":{"name":"Aesthetic Surgery Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aesthetic Surgery Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjaf094","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The efficacy of combining triamcinolone acetonide (TAC) and botulinum toxin type A (BTX-A) in treating hypertrophic scars and keloids remains unclear.

Objectives: This pilot study aimed to compare the clinical efficacy of BTX-A monotherapy and TAC + BTX-A combination therapy in improving scar conditions and to investigate potential mechanisms using a rat burn scar model.

Methods: This study was conducted between March 2022 and December 2024. Each patient's scar was randomly divided into two equal parts, with one part receiving TAC + BTX-A and the other BTX-A alone for three sessions at four-week intervals. Scar thickness was measured using calipers, and the Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS) was used to assess scar condition. Pain and itchiness were evaluated using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) and Visual Analog Scale (VAS), respectively, before each intervention (V1, V2, V3) and four weeks after the last session (V4). In the animal study, rats with burn scars were assigned to five groups: sham, untreated burn, TAC, BTX-A, and TAC + BTX-A. Scar thickness and expressions of α-SMA, TGF-β, CTGF, collagen I/III, laminin, and fibronectin were analyzed histologically.

Results: Clinically, both therapies reduced scar thickness, VSS, NRS, and VAS scores. However, combination therapy showed superior reductions in scar thickness (V2-V4) and VSS scores (V3, V4) compared to BTX-A monotherapy. No significant differences were observed in NRS and VAS scores. The animal study confirmed that combination therapy more effectively reduced scar thickness, TGF-β and CTGF levels, and the collagen I/III ratio, while increasing the laminin/fibronectin ratio.

Conclusions: TAC + BTX-A combination therapy enhances scar reduction by more effectively suppressing fibroblast proliferation and activation through TGF-β and CTGF downregulation, promoting scar remodeling.

曲安奈德和肉毒杆菌毒素A联合治疗与肉毒杆菌毒素A单一治疗相比,疤痕减少效果更好:一项转化性先导研究。
背景:曲安奈德(TAC)联合A型肉毒毒素(BTX-A)治疗增生性疤痕和瘢痕疙瘩的疗效尚不清楚。目的:本初步研究旨在比较BTX-A单药治疗和TAC + BTX-A联合治疗在改善大鼠烧伤疤痕模型中的临床疗效,并探讨其可能的机制。方法:本研究于2022年3月至2024年12月进行。每个患者的疤痕被随机分成两个相等的部分,一部分接受TAC + BTX-A,另一部分单独接受BTX-A,每隔四周进行三次治疗。用卡尺测量疤痕厚度,用温哥华疤痕量表(VSS)评估疤痕状况。分别在每次干预前(V1、V2、V3)和最后一次干预后4周(V4)采用数值评定量表(NRS)和视觉模拟量表(VAS)对疼痛和瘙痒进行评估。在动物实验中,烧伤疤痕大鼠被分为五组:假烧伤、未治疗烧伤、TAC、BTX-A和TAC + BTX-A。组织学分析瘢痕厚度及α-SMA、TGF-β、CTGF、胶原I/III、层粘连蛋白、纤维连接蛋白的表达。结果:在临床上,两种治疗方法均降低了疤痕厚度、VSS、NRS和VAS评分。然而,与BTX-A单药治疗相比,联合治疗在疤痕厚度(V2-V4)和VSS评分(V3, V4)方面显示出更好的降低。NRS和VAS评分无显著差异。动物实验证实,联合治疗更有效地降低了疤痕厚度、TGF-β和CTGF水平以及胶原I/III比值,同时增加了层粘连蛋白/纤维连接蛋白比值。结论:TAC + BTX-A联合治疗通过下调TGF-β和CTGF,促进疤痕重塑,更有效地抑制成纤维细胞增殖和活化,从而促进疤痕的减少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
20.70%
发文量
309
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Aesthetic Surgery Journal is a peer-reviewed international journal focusing on scientific developments and clinical techniques in aesthetic surgery. The official publication of The Aesthetic Society, ASJ is also the official English-language journal of many major international societies of plastic, aesthetic and reconstructive surgery representing South America, Central America, Europe, Asia, and the Middle East. It is also the official journal of the British Association of Aesthetic Plastic Surgeons, the Canadian Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery and The Rhinoplasty Society.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信