Evaluation of Organic Explosive Training Aids: A Chemical Profiling Approach

IF 1.7 3区 化学 Q4 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS
Yong Guan Peter Chua, Anna Sok Ping Lim, May Bee Leng Ong
{"title":"Evaluation of Organic Explosive Training Aids: A Chemical Profiling Approach","authors":"Yong Guan Peter Chua,&nbsp;Anna Sok Ping Lim,&nbsp;May Bee Leng Ong","doi":"10.1002/rcm.10076","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Rational</h3>\n \n <p>Organic explosive training aids play a vital role in training canines to detect explosive safely and effectively. However, there is limited scientific knowledge regarding the chemical composition and odour profiles of these aids, as well as the relationship between these characteristics. To address this gap, this study conducted chemical profiling to identify the chemical compounds and volatile organic compounds (VOCs) of these training aids. Additionally, the study aims to evaluate how factors such as explosive type, physical form and storage duration influence these critical training materials.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>The chemical compounds from the training aids were extracted using sonication with acetonitrile, whereas volatile organic compounds were collected through heat exposure and solid-phase microextraction (SPME) fibres. Both the extracted chemical compounds and VOCs were analysed using gas chromatography mass spectrometry (GCMS). GCMS analysis was conducted in both scan and selective ion modes, enabling simultaneous qualitative and quantitative assessments, thereby optimizing efficiency and reducing costs.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Silica-based aids showed a decrease in physical explosive content over time due to environmental exposure, whereas petroleum-based aids maintained consistent explosive levels due to the protective encapsulation of petroleum jelly. Silica-based aids are observed to emit higher concentrations of explosive vapour, whereas petroleum-based aids were characterized by more complex odour profiles. Additionally, the explosive vapour released from silica-based aids did not always correlate proportionally with their physical explosive content, unlike their petroleum-based aids.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>This study provided valuable insights into how explosive type, base material and storage duration influence the properties of organic explosive training aids. Through the novel approach of integrating findings from composition and odour profiling, it introduces a transformative advancement in the understanding of these aids. This study also paves the way for the development of more reliable and effective training aids, thereby improving the efficiency and accuracy of canine explosive detection.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":225,"journal":{"name":"Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry","volume":"39 17","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://analyticalsciencejournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/rcm.10076","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rational

Organic explosive training aids play a vital role in training canines to detect explosive safely and effectively. However, there is limited scientific knowledge regarding the chemical composition and odour profiles of these aids, as well as the relationship between these characteristics. To address this gap, this study conducted chemical profiling to identify the chemical compounds and volatile organic compounds (VOCs) of these training aids. Additionally, the study aims to evaluate how factors such as explosive type, physical form and storage duration influence these critical training materials.

Methods

The chemical compounds from the training aids were extracted using sonication with acetonitrile, whereas volatile organic compounds were collected through heat exposure and solid-phase microextraction (SPME) fibres. Both the extracted chemical compounds and VOCs were analysed using gas chromatography mass spectrometry (GCMS). GCMS analysis was conducted in both scan and selective ion modes, enabling simultaneous qualitative and quantitative assessments, thereby optimizing efficiency and reducing costs.

Results

Silica-based aids showed a decrease in physical explosive content over time due to environmental exposure, whereas petroleum-based aids maintained consistent explosive levels due to the protective encapsulation of petroleum jelly. Silica-based aids are observed to emit higher concentrations of explosive vapour, whereas petroleum-based aids were characterized by more complex odour profiles. Additionally, the explosive vapour released from silica-based aids did not always correlate proportionally with their physical explosive content, unlike their petroleum-based aids.

Conclusions

This study provided valuable insights into how explosive type, base material and storage duration influence the properties of organic explosive training aids. Through the novel approach of integrating findings from composition and odour profiling, it introduces a transformative advancement in the understanding of these aids. This study also paves the way for the development of more reliable and effective training aids, thereby improving the efficiency and accuracy of canine explosive detection.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

有机爆炸训练辅助物的评价:化学分析方法
合理的有机爆炸物训练辅助器材对训练犬安全有效地探测爆炸物起着至关重要的作用。然而,关于这些助剂的化学成分和气味特征,以及这些特征之间的关系,科学知识有限。为了解决这一差距,本研究进行了化学分析,以确定这些训练辅助物的化学成分和挥发性有机化合物(VOCs)。此外,本研究旨在评估爆炸类型、物理形态和储存时间等因素对这些关键训练材料的影响。方法采用乙腈超声法提取训练助剂中的化学成分,采用热暴露法和固相微萃取法(SPME)收集挥发性有机物。采用气相色谱-质谱(GCMS)对提取的化合物和挥发性有机化合物进行分析。GCMS分析在扫描和选择离子模式下进行,可以同时进行定性和定量评估,从而优化效率并降低成本。结果由于环境暴露,硅基助剂的物理爆炸性含量随着时间的推移而降低,而石油基助剂由于凡士林的保护性封装而保持恒定的爆炸性水平。据观察,硅基助剂会释放出更高浓度的爆炸性蒸汽,而石油基助剂则具有更复杂的气味特征。此外,与石油基助剂不同,硅基助剂释放的爆炸性蒸汽并不总是与其物理爆炸性含量成比例相关。结论本研究对炸药种类、基材和贮存时间对有机爆炸训练助剂性能的影响提供了有价值的见解。通过整合从组成和气味分析的发现的新方法,它介绍了这些援助的理解变革的进步。本研究也为开发更可靠有效的训练辅助工具铺平了道路,从而提高犬类爆炸物探测的效率和准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
5.00%
发文量
219
审稿时长
2.6 months
期刊介绍: Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry is a journal whose aim is the rapid publication of original research results and ideas on all aspects of the science of gas-phase ions; it covers all the associated scientific disciplines. There is no formal limit on paper length ("rapid" is not synonymous with "brief"), but papers should be of a length that is commensurate with the importance and complexity of the results being reported. Contributions may be theoretical or practical in nature; they may deal with methods, techniques and applications, or with the interpretation of results; they may cover any area in science that depends directly on measurements made upon gaseous ions or that is associated with such measurements.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信