Return of diversity: Wetland plant community recovery following purple loosestrife biocontrol

IF 4.3 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY
Stacy B. Endriss, Victoria Nuzzo, Bernd Blossey
{"title":"Return of diversity: Wetland plant community recovery following purple loosestrife biocontrol","authors":"Stacy B. Endriss,&nbsp;Victoria Nuzzo,&nbsp;Bernd Blossey","doi":"10.1002/eap.70064","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Spread of non-native species can be important drivers of biodiversity declines, leading to precautionary management based on assumptions that (1) non-native biota have negative impacts and are “guilty” of causing harm and (2) reducing a non-native species' abundance will reduce these negative impacts, in turn, benefiting native species. However, we frequently lack data to gauge both negative impacts of non-native species and success or failure of chosen management interventions to benefit native species. Addressing these knowledge gaps is critical to improving management outcomes for native species while maintaining public trust to sustain funding of management activities. Here, we investigated the response of <i>Lythrum salicaria</i> (purple loosestrife) and associated plant communities to implementation of biological control in more than 10 wetland sites in New York State for up to 28 years. Introduced to North America from Europe in the 1800s, <i>L. salicaria</i> is a prime example of a non-native species with a continent-wide distribution that could not be suppressed by mechanical and chemical treatments. In the 1980s, waterfowl biologists, wetland managers, and conservationists alike worried about the loss of diverse wetland plant communities associated with the rapid expansion of <i>L. salicaria.</i> In response, after careful assessments of safety, and potential costs and benefits, four highly host-specific insect herbivores were released in North America in the early 1990s to reduce <i>L. salicaria</i> abundance and its negative ecological impacts. In a companion paper, Blossey et al. documented reduced <i>L. salicaria</i> occupancy and stem densities following insect releases over time (i.e., biological success), irrespective of site-specific differences in starting plant communities or <i>L. salicaria</i> abundance. Here, we show that reduced abundance of <i>L. salicaria</i> leads to the ultimate goal of non-native plant management: increased cover, abundance, and diversity of species, often of native species (i.e., ecological success). We also conduct analyses to provide inference about which plant species are most sensitive to <i>L. salicaria</i>, including changes in <i>L. salicaria</i> stem density. Overall, we provide an important conservation success story: our findings emphasize that biocontrol of non-native plants can be effective and safe, allowing native species to recover as a dominant non-native species gradually declines.</p>","PeriodicalId":55168,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Applications","volume":"35 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/eap.70064","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Applications","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/eap.70064","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Spread of non-native species can be important drivers of biodiversity declines, leading to precautionary management based on assumptions that (1) non-native biota have negative impacts and are “guilty” of causing harm and (2) reducing a non-native species' abundance will reduce these negative impacts, in turn, benefiting native species. However, we frequently lack data to gauge both negative impacts of non-native species and success or failure of chosen management interventions to benefit native species. Addressing these knowledge gaps is critical to improving management outcomes for native species while maintaining public trust to sustain funding of management activities. Here, we investigated the response of Lythrum salicaria (purple loosestrife) and associated plant communities to implementation of biological control in more than 10 wetland sites in New York State for up to 28 years. Introduced to North America from Europe in the 1800s, L. salicaria is a prime example of a non-native species with a continent-wide distribution that could not be suppressed by mechanical and chemical treatments. In the 1980s, waterfowl biologists, wetland managers, and conservationists alike worried about the loss of diverse wetland plant communities associated with the rapid expansion of L. salicaria. In response, after careful assessments of safety, and potential costs and benefits, four highly host-specific insect herbivores were released in North America in the early 1990s to reduce L. salicaria abundance and its negative ecological impacts. In a companion paper, Blossey et al. documented reduced L. salicaria occupancy and stem densities following insect releases over time (i.e., biological success), irrespective of site-specific differences in starting plant communities or L. salicaria abundance. Here, we show that reduced abundance of L. salicaria leads to the ultimate goal of non-native plant management: increased cover, abundance, and diversity of species, often of native species (i.e., ecological success). We also conduct analyses to provide inference about which plant species are most sensitive to L. salicaria, including changes in L. salicaria stem density. Overall, we provide an important conservation success story: our findings emphasize that biocontrol of non-native plants can be effective and safe, allowing native species to recover as a dominant non-native species gradually declines.

多样性回归:紫松草生物防治后湿地植物群落的恢复
非本地物种的传播可能是生物多样性下降的重要驱动因素,导致基于以下假设的预防性管理:(1)非本地生物群具有负面影响并且“有罪”造成伤害;(2)减少非本地物种的丰度将减少这些负面影响,反过来有利于本地物种。然而,我们经常缺乏数据来衡量非本地物种的负面影响和选择的管理干预措施的成功或失败,以使本地物种受益。解决这些知识差距对于改善本地物种的管理成果,同时保持公众信任以维持管理活动的资金至关重要。本研究在美国纽约州10多个湿地进行了长达28年的生物防治试验,研究了水杨Lythrum salicaria(紫色松草)及其相关植物群落对生物防治措施的响应。19世纪从欧洲引入北美的水杨属(L. salicaria)是一种非本地物种的典型例子,它在整个大陆都有分布,无法通过机械和化学处理加以抑制。在20世纪80年代,水禽生物学家、湿地管理者和自然资源保护主义者都担心水蚤的快速扩张会导致湿地植物群落的多样性丧失。因此,在仔细评估了安全性、潜在成本和效益后,于20世纪90年代初在北美释放了四种高度寄主特异性的食草昆虫,以减少水蛭的丰度及其负面生态影响。在另一篇论文中,blosey等人记录了随着时间的推移(即生物成功),随着昆虫释放,水杨草的占用率和茎密度减少,而不考虑起始植物群落或水杨草丰度的特定地点差异。在这里,我们表明,水杨L. salicaria丰度的降低导致了非本地植物管理的最终目标:增加物种(通常是本地物种)的覆盖、丰度和多样性(即生态成功)。我们还通过对水杨茎密度变化的分析来推断哪些植物对水杨茎密度最敏感。总的来说,我们提供了一个重要的保护成功案例:我们的发现强调了对非本地植物的生物控制是有效和安全的,允许本地物种在非本地优势物种逐渐减少的情况下恢复。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ecological Applications
Ecological Applications 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
9.50
自引率
2.00%
发文量
268
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The pages of Ecological Applications are open to research and discussion papers that integrate ecological science and concepts with their application and implications. Of special interest are papers that develop the basic scientific principles on which environmental decision-making should rest, and those that discuss the application of ecological concepts to environmental problem solving, policy, and management. Papers that deal explicitly with policy matters are welcome. Interdisciplinary approaches are encouraged, as are short communications on emerging environmental challenges.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信