From Production to Protection: The Role of Land for Wildlife in Private Land Conservation in Southeast Queensland

IF 2.2 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ECOLOGY
Marilyn Shrapnel, Claudia Baldwin, Lee Kannis-Dymond
{"title":"From Production to Protection: The Role of Land for Wildlife in Private Land Conservation in Southeast Queensland","authors":"Marilyn Shrapnel,&nbsp;Claudia Baldwin,&nbsp;Lee Kannis-Dymond","doi":"10.1111/emr.70012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In an attempt to combat the long-term trend in habitat loss in Australia, a nation-wide focus has encouraged conservation on private property through nonbinding voluntary programmes, such as Land for Wildlife programmes, and legally binding covenants, such as Voluntary Conservation Agreements. This research aimed to identify factors involved in landholder motivations for, and commitments to such programmes. We report on results of interviews (including property walks) and personality assessments of 31 landholders registered for the Land for Wildlife (LfW) programme in three Local Governments in Southeast Queensland, Australia. Personality (both temperament and character dimensions), as well as experiential learning through Land for Wildlife, played a role in developing pronature conservation behaviour, commitment to, and connectedness to nature on property. We make suggestions for resourcing and content of the LfW programme, including adequate allocated funds, stability and continuity of staff, frequent regular events involving a variety of activities with different modes of interaction, and opportunities for the development of social relationships with other registrants as well as Land for Wildlife officers (i.e., a Land for Wildlife community).</p>","PeriodicalId":54325,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Management & Restoration","volume":"26 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/emr.70012","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Management & Restoration","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/emr.70012","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In an attempt to combat the long-term trend in habitat loss in Australia, a nation-wide focus has encouraged conservation on private property through nonbinding voluntary programmes, such as Land for Wildlife programmes, and legally binding covenants, such as Voluntary Conservation Agreements. This research aimed to identify factors involved in landholder motivations for, and commitments to such programmes. We report on results of interviews (including property walks) and personality assessments of 31 landholders registered for the Land for Wildlife (LfW) programme in three Local Governments in Southeast Queensland, Australia. Personality (both temperament and character dimensions), as well as experiential learning through Land for Wildlife, played a role in developing pronature conservation behaviour, commitment to, and connectedness to nature on property. We make suggestions for resourcing and content of the LfW programme, including adequate allocated funds, stability and continuity of staff, frequent regular events involving a variety of activities with different modes of interaction, and opportunities for the development of social relationships with other registrants as well as Land for Wildlife officers (i.e., a Land for Wildlife community).

Abstract Image

从生产到保护:昆士兰东南部私人土地保护中野生动物土地的作用
为了应对澳大利亚栖息地丧失的长期趋势,全国范围内的重点是鼓励通过非约束性自愿方案(如“野生动物土地”方案)和具有法律约束力的公约(如“自愿保护协定”)保护私有财产。这项研究的目的是确定土地所有者对这些方案的动机和承诺所涉及的因素。我们报告了在澳大利亚昆士兰州东南部的三个地方政府中为野生动物土地(LfW)计划注册的31名土地所有者的访谈结果(包括财产散步)和性格评估。个性(包括气质和性格维度),以及通过“野生动物土地”项目进行的体验式学习,在发展自然保护行为、对自然的承诺和与自然的联系方面发挥了作用。我们对LfW项目的资源和内容提出建议,包括充足的拨款、工作人员的稳定性和连续性、频繁的定期活动,包括各种不同互动模式的活动,以及与其他注册人发展社会关系的机会,以及土地为野生动物官员(即土地为野生动物社区)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ecological Management & Restoration
Ecological Management & Restoration Environmental Science-Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Ecological Management & Restoration is a peer-reviewed journal with the dual aims of (i) reporting the latest science to assist ecologically appropriate management and restoration actions and (ii) providing a forum for reporting on these actions. Guided by an editorial board made up of researchers and practitioners, EMR seeks features, topical opinion pieces, research reports, short notes and project summaries applicable to Australasian ecosystems to encourage more regionally-appropriate management. Where relevant, contributions should draw on international science and practice and highlight any relevance to the global challenge of integrating biodiversity conservation in a rapidly changing world. Topic areas: Improved management and restoration of plant communities, fauna and habitat; coastal, marine and riparian zones; restoration ethics and philosophy; planning; monitoring and assessment; policy and legislation; landscape pattern and design; integrated ecosystems management; socio-economic issues and solutions; techniques and methodology; threatened species; genetic issues; indigenous land management; weeds and feral animal control; landscape arts and aesthetics; education and communication; community involvement.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信