Utilizing Learning-Analytics-Based Activities as a Bridge to Enhance Elementary Students’ Mathematical Learning

IF 2.9 3区 教育学 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
Sergio Tirado-Olivares;Rocío Mínguez-Pardo;Javier del Olmo-Muñoz;José A. González-Calero
{"title":"Utilizing Learning-Analytics-Based Activities as a Bridge to Enhance Elementary Students’ Mathematical Learning","authors":"Sergio Tirado-Olivares;Rocío Mínguez-Pardo;Javier del Olmo-Muñoz;José A. González-Calero","doi":"10.1109/TLT.2025.3570979","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Decimal misconceptions are a persistent challenge in mathematics education, often hindering students’ long-term understanding. This study examines how learning analytics (LA) can be effectively integrated into instructional sequences to address these misconceptions, providing teachers with real-time insights for formative assessment. Despite the growing presence of technology in education, LA remains underutilized at the primary level. The study involved 235 fifth- and sixth-grade students completing decimal number tasks through a Moodle-based platform. Students were assigned to one of three conditions: tasks based on correct examples (CE tasks, <italic>n</i> = 79), erroneous examples (<italic>n</i> = 80), or no tasks (control group, <italic>n</i> = 76). Results indicate that example-based tasks significantly improve learning outcomes, particularly for students with lower prior knowledge, who benefited more from CE tasks. LA data effectively predicted student performance, demonstrating its potential as a formative assessment tool. Importantly, results suggest that the observed effects were consistent across male and female students. These findings highlight the need to integrate LA into daily teaching practice, enabling educators to identify misconceptions and tailor instruction accordingly. Given the positive student reception and the efficiency of LA-driven interventions, this study underscores its relevance for policy decisions aimed at enhancing mathematics education in primary schools.","PeriodicalId":49191,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies","volume":"18 ","pages":"593-605"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=11006300","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/11006300/","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Decimal misconceptions are a persistent challenge in mathematics education, often hindering students’ long-term understanding. This study examines how learning analytics (LA) can be effectively integrated into instructional sequences to address these misconceptions, providing teachers with real-time insights for formative assessment. Despite the growing presence of technology in education, LA remains underutilized at the primary level. The study involved 235 fifth- and sixth-grade students completing decimal number tasks through a Moodle-based platform. Students were assigned to one of three conditions: tasks based on correct examples (CE tasks, n = 79), erroneous examples (n = 80), or no tasks (control group, n = 76). Results indicate that example-based tasks significantly improve learning outcomes, particularly for students with lower prior knowledge, who benefited more from CE tasks. LA data effectively predicted student performance, demonstrating its potential as a formative assessment tool. Importantly, results suggest that the observed effects were consistent across male and female students. These findings highlight the need to integrate LA into daily teaching practice, enabling educators to identify misconceptions and tailor instruction accordingly. Given the positive student reception and the efficiency of LA-driven interventions, this study underscores its relevance for policy decisions aimed at enhancing mathematics education in primary schools.
以学习分析活动为桥梁促进小学生数学学习
十进制误解是数学教育中一个持续存在的挑战,经常阻碍学生的长期理解。本研究探讨了如何将学习分析(LA)有效地整合到教学序列中,以解决这些误解,为教师提供形成性评估的实时见解。尽管技术在教育中的应用越来越多,但在小学阶段,LA仍然没有得到充分利用。这项研究涉及235名五年级和六年级的学生,他们通过基于moodle的平台完成十进制数字任务。学生们被分配到三种情况中的一种:基于正确例子的任务(CE任务,n = 79),错误例子(n = 80),或者没有任务(对照组,n = 76)。研究结果表明,基于实例的任务显著提高了学习效果,特别是对于那些先验知识较低的学生,他们从CE任务中获益更多。洛杉矶数据有效地预测了学生的表现,展示了其作为形成性评估工具的潜力。重要的是,结果表明,观察到的效果在男女学生中是一致的。这些发现强调了将LA融入日常教学实践的必要性,使教育者能够识别误解并相应地调整教学。考虑到积极的学生接受和洛杉矶驱动的干预措施的效率,本研究强调了其与旨在加强小学数学教育的政策决策的相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies
IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS-
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
5.40%
发文量
82
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies covers all advances in learning technologies and their applications, including but not limited to the following topics: innovative online learning systems; intelligent tutors; educational games; simulation systems for education and training; collaborative learning tools; learning with mobile devices; wearable devices and interfaces for learning; personalized and adaptive learning systems; tools for formative and summative assessment; tools for learning analytics and educational data mining; ontologies for learning systems; standards and web services that support learning; authoring tools for learning materials; computer support for peer tutoring; learning via computer-mediated inquiry, field, and lab work; social learning techniques; social networks and infrastructures for learning and knowledge sharing; and creation and management of learning objects.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信