Prefrontal cortex activation during daily movements and its association with clinical symptoms in knee osteoarthritis

IF 2.8
Soyoung Lee , Ehyun Kim , Baekdong Cha , Claudio L. Ferre , Meryem Yücel , Deepak Kumar
{"title":"Prefrontal cortex activation during daily movements and its association with clinical symptoms in knee osteoarthritis","authors":"Soyoung Lee ,&nbsp;Ehyun Kim ,&nbsp;Baekdong Cha ,&nbsp;Claudio L. Ferre ,&nbsp;Meryem Yücel ,&nbsp;Deepak Kumar","doi":"10.1016/j.ocarto.2025.100615","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>For people with knee osteoarthritis (OA), step-up is one of the most physically demanding and pain-evoking daily movements. Given the significant role of the prefrontal cortex (PFC) in executive function and pain modulation, our objectives were (1) to assess PFC activation during walking and step-up in people with knee OA and (2) to examine the association of pain and psychological outcomes with changes in PFC activation from walking to step-up.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>This cross-sectional study included 44 individuals with symptomatic knee OA. Participants completed Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), Pain, Enjoyment of Life, and General Activity (PEG) scale, Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-8) for mood, 3-item Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS), and Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (FABQ). Oxygenated hemoglobin concentration changes (HbO<sub>2</sub>) in the bilateral PFC were assessed using functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy. HbO<sub>2</sub> were compared between tasks using repeated measures ANCOVA. Multiple linear regression models tested the association between clinical outcomes and changes in HbO<sub>2</sub> from walking to step-up while adjusting for confounders.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>HbO<sub>2</sub> during step-up was higher compared to walking, with moderate effect size (<em>d</em> ​= ​0.3–0.5). Greater pain catastrophizing (R<sup>2</sup> ​= ​0.10) was correlated with smaller changes in HbO<sub>2</sub> from walking to step-up.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>People with knee OA utilized greater executive control during step-up compared to walking. Similar to stair climbing, step-up is more physically demanding and more frequently impaired than walking. Greater pain catastrophizing was related to smaller increases in PFC activation from walking to step-up, reflecting the availability of fewer executive resources to maintain task performance.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74377,"journal":{"name":"Osteoarthritis and cartilage open","volume":"7 3","pages":"Article 100615"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Osteoarthritis and cartilage open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2665913125000512","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

For people with knee osteoarthritis (OA), step-up is one of the most physically demanding and pain-evoking daily movements. Given the significant role of the prefrontal cortex (PFC) in executive function and pain modulation, our objectives were (1) to assess PFC activation during walking and step-up in people with knee OA and (2) to examine the association of pain and psychological outcomes with changes in PFC activation from walking to step-up.

Design

This cross-sectional study included 44 individuals with symptomatic knee OA. Participants completed Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), Pain, Enjoyment of Life, and General Activity (PEG) scale, Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-8) for mood, 3-item Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS), and Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (FABQ). Oxygenated hemoglobin concentration changes (HbO2) in the bilateral PFC were assessed using functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy. HbO2 were compared between tasks using repeated measures ANCOVA. Multiple linear regression models tested the association between clinical outcomes and changes in HbO2 from walking to step-up while adjusting for confounders.

Results

HbO2 during step-up was higher compared to walking, with moderate effect size (d ​= ​0.3–0.5). Greater pain catastrophizing (R2 ​= ​0.10) was correlated with smaller changes in HbO2 from walking to step-up.

Conclusion

People with knee OA utilized greater executive control during step-up compared to walking. Similar to stair climbing, step-up is more physically demanding and more frequently impaired than walking. Greater pain catastrophizing was related to smaller increases in PFC activation from walking to step-up, reflecting the availability of fewer executive resources to maintain task performance.
膝关节骨关节炎患者日常运动时前额叶皮层的激活及其与临床症状的关系
对于患有膝骨关节炎(OA)的人来说,踏步是最费力和最容易引起疼痛的日常运动之一。考虑到前额皮质(PFC)在执行功能和疼痛调节中的重要作用,我们的目标是(1)评估膝关节OA患者在行走和加速过程中PFC的激活情况;(2)检查疼痛和心理结果与PFC在行走和加速过程中的激活变化之间的关系。设计:本横断面研究纳入44例症状性膝关节炎患者。参与者完成膝关节损伤和骨关节炎结局评分(oos)、疼痛、生活享受和一般活动(PEG)量表、患者情绪健康问卷(PHQ-8)、3项疼痛灾难化量表(PCS)和恐惧回避信念问卷(FABQ)。应用功能近红外光谱法评估双侧PFC中氧合血红蛋白浓度变化(HbO2)。使用重复测量ANCOVA比较任务间HbO2。在调整混杂因素后,多元线性回归模型检验了临床结果与HbO2从步行到加速变化之间的关系。结果升压时shbo2较步行时升高,效应大小中等(d = 0.3 ~ 0.5)。更大的疼痛灾难化(R2 = 0.10)与HbO2从步行到加速的变化较小相关。结论:与步行相比,膝关节OA患者在台阶运动中有更强的执行控制能力。与爬楼梯类似,爬楼梯对身体的要求更高,而且比走路更容易受伤。更大的痛苦灾难化与从步行到加速的PFC激活的较小增加有关,反映了维持任务表现的执行资源的可用性更少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Osteoarthritis and cartilage open
Osteoarthritis and cartilage open Orthopedics, Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信