From emotion to reflection: leveraging EmotionPrompt strategy to empower self-determination in decision-making with generative artificial intelligence

IF 8.2 2区 管理学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS
Xusen Cheng , Lu Gao , Xin (Robert) Luo
{"title":"From emotion to reflection: leveraging EmotionPrompt strategy to empower self-determination in decision-making with generative artificial intelligence","authors":"Xusen Cheng ,&nbsp;Lu Gao ,&nbsp;Xin (Robert) Luo","doi":"10.1016/j.im.2025.104194","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Communication and reflection abilities are critical in managing strategic cooperation between humans and Generative Artificial Intelligence (GAI), especially when facing conflict in decision-making. This study introduces two variations of EmotionPrompt strategies, drawing on regulatory focus theory, to explore both individuals' perceptions of GAI ability and their empowerment in self-competence when handling disagreements. An experiment between humans and GAI chatbots in determining product promotion strategy showed that emotional prompts impact individuals' reappraisals of both chatbots and their own performance profoundly, cultivating self-determination in the final decision. Importantly, EmotionPrompt with promotion orientation can increase the perceived flexibility of chatbot decision-makers, facilitating individual self-enhancement and trust in GAI competence. In contrast, the prevention-oriented EmotionPrompt appears to constrain individuals' judgments and decision-making processes, as evidenced by the increased occurrence of inhibit words and anxiety emotions in their reflections. These findings provide novel perspectives on implementing specific regulatory-oriented EmotionPrompt strategies in GAI to address opinion conflicts in decision-making with humans.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":56291,"journal":{"name":"Information & Management","volume":"62 7","pages":"Article 104194"},"PeriodicalIF":8.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Information & Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378720625000977","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Communication and reflection abilities are critical in managing strategic cooperation between humans and Generative Artificial Intelligence (GAI), especially when facing conflict in decision-making. This study introduces two variations of EmotionPrompt strategies, drawing on regulatory focus theory, to explore both individuals' perceptions of GAI ability and their empowerment in self-competence when handling disagreements. An experiment between humans and GAI chatbots in determining product promotion strategy showed that emotional prompts impact individuals' reappraisals of both chatbots and their own performance profoundly, cultivating self-determination in the final decision. Importantly, EmotionPrompt with promotion orientation can increase the perceived flexibility of chatbot decision-makers, facilitating individual self-enhancement and trust in GAI competence. In contrast, the prevention-oriented EmotionPrompt appears to constrain individuals' judgments and decision-making processes, as evidenced by the increased occurrence of inhibit words and anxiety emotions in their reflections. These findings provide novel perspectives on implementing specific regulatory-oriented EmotionPrompt strategies in GAI to address opinion conflicts in decision-making with humans.
从情感到反思:利用EmotionPrompt策略,通过生成式人工智能赋予决策自主权
沟通和反思能力在管理人类与生成式人工智能(GAI)之间的战略合作中至关重要,特别是在面临决策冲突时。本研究引入了EmotionPrompt策略的两种变体,利用调节焦点理论来探讨个体对GAI能力的感知以及他们在处理分歧时对自我能力的授权。一项人类与GAI聊天机器人确定产品推广策略的实验表明,情绪提示会深刻影响个人对聊天机器人和自身表现的重新评估,培养最终决策的自决权。重要的是,具有提升导向的EmotionPrompt可以增加聊天机器人决策者的感知灵活性,促进个人自我提升和对GAI能力的信任。相反,以预防为导向的EmotionPrompt似乎限制了个体的判断和决策过程,这可以从他们反思中抑制词和焦虑情绪的增加中得到证明。这些发现为在GAI中实施特定的以监管为导向的EmotionPrompt策略以解决与人类决策中的意见冲突提供了新的视角。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Information & Management
Information & Management 工程技术-计算机:信息系统
CiteScore
17.90
自引率
6.10%
发文量
123
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Information & Management is a publication that caters to researchers in the field of information systems as well as managers, professionals, administrators, and senior executives involved in designing, implementing, and managing Information Systems Applications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信