From tyranny to hope: Harnessing the power of small decisions to achieve urban sustainability goals

IF 4.9 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Corinne G. Bassett , Susan D. Day , Cecil C. Konijnendijk , Kai M.A. Chan , Lara A. Roman
{"title":"From tyranny to hope: Harnessing the power of small decisions to achieve urban sustainability goals","authors":"Corinne G. Bassett ,&nbsp;Susan D. Day ,&nbsp;Cecil C. Konijnendijk ,&nbsp;Kai M.A. Chan ,&nbsp;Lara A. Roman","doi":"10.1016/j.envsci.2025.104125","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Policy makers and planners aim to overcome the “tyranny of small decisions” to address the triple planetary threats of climate change, biodiversity loss, and pollution. However, top-down policies intended to prevent the accumulation of small decisions from undermining collective goods and public infrastructure have removed agency from individuals and caused unintended negative impacts on society. Urban areas are a critical context to examine the role of small decisions because of the extreme diversity and density of decisions and decision-makers within them, their increasing growth worldwide, and their outsized ecological footprint on the world. We bring the economic concept of the tyranny of small decisions to the context of urban nature-based solutions, specifically, urban forestry initiatives, to show how under certain conditions small site-level decisions can support critical long-term social and environmental goals—as opposed to the current tendency to see only their potential to derail such goals. We argue that when social and ecological contexts vary at fine scales in ways that require place-based nuance in environmental management, policy makers and planners should seek to understand and support these small decisions, and promote solutions which harness the knowledge of ecological stewards in service of strategic goals. Failing to do so overlooks the power of human-nature relationships and specialized knowledge, missing opportunities to catalyze self-organization and creativity needed to propel cities towards sustainable futures.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":313,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Science & Policy","volume":"170 ","pages":"Article 104125"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Science & Policy","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1462901125001418","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Policy makers and planners aim to overcome the “tyranny of small decisions” to address the triple planetary threats of climate change, biodiversity loss, and pollution. However, top-down policies intended to prevent the accumulation of small decisions from undermining collective goods and public infrastructure have removed agency from individuals and caused unintended negative impacts on society. Urban areas are a critical context to examine the role of small decisions because of the extreme diversity and density of decisions and decision-makers within them, their increasing growth worldwide, and their outsized ecological footprint on the world. We bring the economic concept of the tyranny of small decisions to the context of urban nature-based solutions, specifically, urban forestry initiatives, to show how under certain conditions small site-level decisions can support critical long-term social and environmental goals—as opposed to the current tendency to see only their potential to derail such goals. We argue that when social and ecological contexts vary at fine scales in ways that require place-based nuance in environmental management, policy makers and planners should seek to understand and support these small decisions, and promote solutions which harness the knowledge of ecological stewards in service of strategic goals. Failing to do so overlooks the power of human-nature relationships and specialized knowledge, missing opportunities to catalyze self-organization and creativity needed to propel cities towards sustainable futures.
从专制到希望:利用小决策的力量实现城市可持续发展目标
政策制定者和规划者的目标是克服“小决策的暴政”,以应对气候变化、生物多样性丧失和污染这三重地球威胁。然而,旨在防止小决策累积破坏集体利益和公共基础设施的自上而下的政策剥夺了个人的能动性,并对社会造成了意想不到的负面影响。城市地区是研究小决策作用的关键环境,因为决策和决策者的多样性和密度极高,在世界范围内不断增长,在世界上产生了巨大的生态足迹。我们将小决策暴政的经济概念引入基于城市自然的解决方案,特别是城市林业倡议,以展示在某些条件下,小的场地级决策如何支持关键的长期社会和环境目标,而不是目前只看到它们破坏这些目标的潜力的趋势。我们认为,当社会和生态环境在细微的尺度上发生变化,需要在环境管理中进行基于地点的细微差别时,政策制定者和规划者应该寻求理解和支持这些小决策,并促进利用生态管理者的知识为战略目标服务的解决方案。如果不这样做,就忽视了人与自然关系和专业知识的力量,错失了推动城市走向可持续未来所需的自我组织和创造力的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Environmental Science & Policy
Environmental Science & Policy 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
8.30%
发文量
332
审稿时长
68 days
期刊介绍: Environmental Science & Policy promotes communication among government, business and industry, academia, and non-governmental organisations who are instrumental in the solution of environmental problems. It also seeks to advance interdisciplinary research of policy relevance on environmental issues such as climate change, biodiversity, environmental pollution and wastes, renewable and non-renewable natural resources, sustainability, and the interactions among these issues. The journal emphasises the linkages between these environmental issues and social and economic issues such as production, transport, consumption, growth, demographic changes, well-being, and health. However, the subject coverage will not be restricted to these issues and the introduction of new dimensions will be encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信