Anthrax knowledge, perception, and preventive practices of livestock workers and household animal owners in Nigeria

Eniola Cadmus , Hezekiah K. Adesokan , Emmanuel J. Awosanya , Paul M. Iziomo , Victor O. Akinseye , Mathias A. Besong , Adeyemi O. Jolaoso , Nma Bida Alhaji , Okuonghae O. Pere-ere , Ephraim Nwanga , Terese G. Orum , Ayokunle O. Omileye , Adeola A. Adeleye , Samuel Owoicho , Olalekan J. Taiwo , Rashid Ansumana , Columba Vakuru , Simeon I. Cadmus
{"title":"Anthrax knowledge, perception, and preventive practices of livestock workers and household animal owners in Nigeria","authors":"Eniola Cadmus ,&nbsp;Hezekiah K. Adesokan ,&nbsp;Emmanuel J. Awosanya ,&nbsp;Paul M. Iziomo ,&nbsp;Victor O. Akinseye ,&nbsp;Mathias A. Besong ,&nbsp;Adeyemi O. Jolaoso ,&nbsp;Nma Bida Alhaji ,&nbsp;Okuonghae O. Pere-ere ,&nbsp;Ephraim Nwanga ,&nbsp;Terese G. Orum ,&nbsp;Ayokunle O. Omileye ,&nbsp;Adeola A. Adeleye ,&nbsp;Samuel Owoicho ,&nbsp;Olalekan J. Taiwo ,&nbsp;Rashid Ansumana ,&nbsp;Columba Vakuru ,&nbsp;Simeon I. Cadmus","doi":"10.1016/j.ijidoh.2025.100073","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>Anthrax outbreaks pose significant public health and socioeconomic challenges. Following the recent outbreaks, a cross-sectional study was conducted to assess the knowledge, risk perception, and preventive practices of livestock workers and household animal owners regarding anthrax and the associated socioeconomic implications in Nigeria.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A pretested, semi-structured, interviewer-administered questionnaire was used. A total of 1025 respondents from seven of the 36 states in Nigeria were selected and assessed on the basis of reported anthrax outbreaks, bordering with affected states, and livestock presence. Univariate analysis was conducted, and chi-square tests and binary logistic regression were used to assess significant associations between knowledge, risk perception, and independent variables.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of the 1025 respondents, 58.6 % and 79.9 % demonstrated adequate knowledge (score ≥36 of 72) and positive perception (score ≥15 of 24), respectively. Notably, 22 % had never taken any preventive measures against anthrax, and only 27.7 % knew about the anthrax vaccination program for livestock. Exactly 23.8 % indicated that regulations imposed during the anthrax outbreak affected their livestock-related activities, while 40.6 % expressed concern about potentially going out of business because of the anthrax outbreak. Respondents’ knowledge was significantly associated with awareness (adjusted odds ratio: 5.35; 95 % confidence interval: 3.12–9.18).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This study highlights the need for targeted educational programs to bridge knowledge and risk perception gaps and improve preventive practices.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100655,"journal":{"name":"IJID One Health","volume":"7 ","pages":"Article 100073"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IJID One Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949915125000216","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

Anthrax outbreaks pose significant public health and socioeconomic challenges. Following the recent outbreaks, a cross-sectional study was conducted to assess the knowledge, risk perception, and preventive practices of livestock workers and household animal owners regarding anthrax and the associated socioeconomic implications in Nigeria.

Methods

A pretested, semi-structured, interviewer-administered questionnaire was used. A total of 1025 respondents from seven of the 36 states in Nigeria were selected and assessed on the basis of reported anthrax outbreaks, bordering with affected states, and livestock presence. Univariate analysis was conducted, and chi-square tests and binary logistic regression were used to assess significant associations between knowledge, risk perception, and independent variables.

Results

Of the 1025 respondents, 58.6 % and 79.9 % demonstrated adequate knowledge (score ≥36 of 72) and positive perception (score ≥15 of 24), respectively. Notably, 22 % had never taken any preventive measures against anthrax, and only 27.7 % knew about the anthrax vaccination program for livestock. Exactly 23.8 % indicated that regulations imposed during the anthrax outbreak affected their livestock-related activities, while 40.6 % expressed concern about potentially going out of business because of the anthrax outbreak. Respondents’ knowledge was significantly associated with awareness (adjusted odds ratio: 5.35; 95 % confidence interval: 3.12–9.18).

Conclusions

This study highlights the need for targeted educational programs to bridge knowledge and risk perception gaps and improve preventive practices.
尼日利亚畜牧工人和家庭动物主人的炭疽知识、认知和预防措施
目的炭疽疫情对公共卫生和社会经济构成重大挑战。在最近的疫情爆发之后,进行了一项横断面研究,以评估尼日利亚畜牧工人和家庭动物所有者关于炭疽及其相关社会经济影响的知识、风险认知和预防措施。方法采用预测、半结构化、访谈者自行填写的问卷。根据报告的炭疽疫情、与受影响州接壤以及牲畜的存在情况,从尼日利亚36个州中的7个州选出并评估了总共1025名答复者。进行单因素分析,并采用卡方检验和二元逻辑回归来评估知识、风险感知和自变量之间的显著相关性。结果在1025名被调查者中,58.6% %和79.9% %分别表现出足够的知识(72分中得分≥36分)和积极的感知(24分中得分≥15分)。值得注意的是,22 %的人从未采取过任何预防炭疽的措施,只有27.7 %的人知道牲畜炭疽疫苗接种计划。23.8% %的企业表示,炭疽疫情期间实施的法规影响了他们与牲畜有关的活动,而40.6% %的企业表示担心可能因炭疽疫情而倒闭。被调查者的知识与意识显著相关(调整优势比:5.35;95 %置信区间:3.12-9.18)。结论:本研究强调了有针对性的教育项目的必要性,以弥合知识和风险认知差距,并改进预防措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信