{"title":"FACS coding of televised darts players reveals different facial behavior before successful and unsuccessful performances","authors":"Philip Furley","doi":"10.1016/j.psychsport.2025.102904","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The main objective of the present research was to use FACS on the televised pre-performance facial behavior of professional darts players to investigate if the facial behavior differed between successful and unsuccessful performances. A secondary goal of this study was to test if manual facial coding differed from automated coding using Noldus FaceReader. Therefore, a random sampling methodology was utilized to assemble video clips of the facial behavior of all players immediately before throwing darts in the 2017 World darts Championship in two performance categories, poor and good performance (10 clips per players respectively). Two FACS-certified coders blind to performance condition coded the activation intensity of 20 distinct muscle groups in the face (i.e., action units) and were compared to Noldus FaceReader output. Results showed very limited facial muscle movements in the videos across both performance categories and hardly any correlation between FACS and FaceReader data. However, multivariate data analysis of the FACS data revealed less intense action unit activity before good performance vs. poor performance. More specifically, successful darts performance was associated with lower muscle activity around the eyes and the mouth. These findings are discussed in light of previous literature suggesting that the face can be indicative of levels of arousal and anxiety and that low levels of arousal and anxiety prior to fine sensorimotor coordination are associated with performance in these situations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54536,"journal":{"name":"Psychology of Sport and Exercise","volume":"80 ","pages":"Article 102904"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychology of Sport and Exercise","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1469029225001037","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The main objective of the present research was to use FACS on the televised pre-performance facial behavior of professional darts players to investigate if the facial behavior differed between successful and unsuccessful performances. A secondary goal of this study was to test if manual facial coding differed from automated coding using Noldus FaceReader. Therefore, a random sampling methodology was utilized to assemble video clips of the facial behavior of all players immediately before throwing darts in the 2017 World darts Championship in two performance categories, poor and good performance (10 clips per players respectively). Two FACS-certified coders blind to performance condition coded the activation intensity of 20 distinct muscle groups in the face (i.e., action units) and were compared to Noldus FaceReader output. Results showed very limited facial muscle movements in the videos across both performance categories and hardly any correlation between FACS and FaceReader data. However, multivariate data analysis of the FACS data revealed less intense action unit activity before good performance vs. poor performance. More specifically, successful darts performance was associated with lower muscle activity around the eyes and the mouth. These findings are discussed in light of previous literature suggesting that the face can be indicative of levels of arousal and anxiety and that low levels of arousal and anxiety prior to fine sensorimotor coordination are associated with performance in these situations.
期刊介绍:
Psychology of Sport and Exercise is an international forum for scholarly reports in the psychology of sport and exercise, broadly defined. The journal is open to the use of diverse methodological approaches. Manuscripts that will be considered for publication will present results from high quality empirical research, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, commentaries concerning already published PSE papers or topics of general interest for PSE readers, protocol papers for trials, and reports of professional practice (which will need to demonstrate academic rigour and go beyond mere description). The CONSORT guidelines consort-statement need to be followed for protocol papers for trials; authors should present a flow diagramme and attach with their cover letter the CONSORT checklist. For meta-analysis, the PRISMA prisma-statement guidelines should be followed; authors should present a flow diagramme and attach with their cover letter the PRISMA checklist. For systematic reviews it is recommended that the PRISMA guidelines are followed, although it is not compulsory. Authors interested in submitting replications of published studies need to contact the Editors-in-Chief before they start their replication. We are not interested in manuscripts that aim to test the psychometric properties of an existing scale from English to another language, unless new validation methods are used which address previously unanswered research questions.