Biomechanical Analysis of Posterior Segmental Medial Meniscal Transplantation in a Human Cadaveric Model

Mark E. Cinque, Wyatt H. Buchalter, Justin F.M. Hollenbeck, Jonathan D. Haskel, Bradley M. Kruckeberg, Matthew T. Provencher, Jonathan A. Godin
{"title":"Biomechanical Analysis of Posterior Segmental Medial Meniscal Transplantation in a Human Cadaveric Model","authors":"Mark E. Cinque, Wyatt H. Buchalter, Justin F.M. Hollenbeck, Jonathan D. Haskel, Bradley M. Kruckeberg, Matthew T. Provencher, Jonathan A. Godin","doi":"10.1177/03635465251339068","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Partial meniscectomy provides short-term symptom relief but may accelerate the development of knee arthritis due to meniscal deficiency and altered joint biomechanics. While meniscal allograft transplantation (MAT) addresses complete meniscal loss, segmental meniscal transplantation may be an option for segmental loss. Purpose: To evaluate the biomechanical effect of segmental posterior medial meniscal transplantation on knee joint loading characteristics and compare it with the states of both intact meniscus and full MAT. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: Ten fresh-frozen human cadaveric knees (mean age, 54.3 years) were tested under 4 conditions: intact meniscus, segmental medial meniscal loss, segmental posterior horn MAT, and full MAT. The knees were subjected to a 500-N compressive load at 0°, 30°, 60°, and 90° of knee flexion. Medial meniscal extrusion, contact area, mean contact pressure, and peak contact pressure were measured. Statistical analyses included 2-way repeated measures analysis of variance to assess the effects of meniscal state and knee flexion on biomechanical outcomes. Results: Segmental medial meniscal deficiency significantly increased extrusion (+1.32 mm at 0°; +1.45 mm at 30°; +1.42 mm at 60°; and +1.67 mm at 90°) and mean pressure compared with the intact meniscus across all flexion angles. Both segmental transplantation and full transplantation restored extrusion to intact levels, with full transplantation demonstrating superior improvement in peak pressure at flexion angles >60° compared with segmental transplantation. Both segmental and full transplantation restored peak pressure to levels comparable with the intact meniscus at flexion angles ≥30°. Conclusion: Both segmental and full meniscal transplantation tested at the time of surgery restored meniscal extrusion and contact pressure to the intact state. Clinical Relevance: Segmental transplantation may offer a promising approach for managing posterior medial meniscal deficiencies by restoring knee joint function and reducing meniscal extrusion.","PeriodicalId":517411,"journal":{"name":"The American Journal of Sports Medicine","volume":"16 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The American Journal of Sports Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03635465251339068","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Partial meniscectomy provides short-term symptom relief but may accelerate the development of knee arthritis due to meniscal deficiency and altered joint biomechanics. While meniscal allograft transplantation (MAT) addresses complete meniscal loss, segmental meniscal transplantation may be an option for segmental loss. Purpose: To evaluate the biomechanical effect of segmental posterior medial meniscal transplantation on knee joint loading characteristics and compare it with the states of both intact meniscus and full MAT. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: Ten fresh-frozen human cadaveric knees (mean age, 54.3 years) were tested under 4 conditions: intact meniscus, segmental medial meniscal loss, segmental posterior horn MAT, and full MAT. The knees were subjected to a 500-N compressive load at 0°, 30°, 60°, and 90° of knee flexion. Medial meniscal extrusion, contact area, mean contact pressure, and peak contact pressure were measured. Statistical analyses included 2-way repeated measures analysis of variance to assess the effects of meniscal state and knee flexion on biomechanical outcomes. Results: Segmental medial meniscal deficiency significantly increased extrusion (+1.32 mm at 0°; +1.45 mm at 30°; +1.42 mm at 60°; and +1.67 mm at 90°) and mean pressure compared with the intact meniscus across all flexion angles. Both segmental transplantation and full transplantation restored extrusion to intact levels, with full transplantation demonstrating superior improvement in peak pressure at flexion angles >60° compared with segmental transplantation. Both segmental and full transplantation restored peak pressure to levels comparable with the intact meniscus at flexion angles ≥30°. Conclusion: Both segmental and full meniscal transplantation tested at the time of surgery restored meniscal extrusion and contact pressure to the intact state. Clinical Relevance: Segmental transplantation may offer a promising approach for managing posterior medial meniscal deficiencies by restoring knee joint function and reducing meniscal extrusion.
人尸体模型后节段内侧半月板移植的生物力学分析
背景:半月板部分切除术可以短期缓解症状,但由于半月板缺陷和关节生物力学改变,可能会加速膝关节关节炎的发展。虽然同种异体半月板移植(MAT)可以解决半月板完全丧失,但节段性半月板移植可能是治疗节段性丧失的一种选择。目的:评价节段性后内侧半月板移植对膝关节负荷特性的生物力学影响,并将其与完整半月板和完整半月板的状态进行比较。研究设计:对照实验室研究。方法:10个新鲜冷冻的人体尸体膝关节(平均年龄54.3岁)在4种情况下进行了测试:完整的半月板、节段的内侧半月板缺失、节段的后角MAT和完全MAT。膝关节在0°、30°、60°和90°屈曲时承受500-N的压缩载荷。测量内侧半月板挤压、接触面积、平均接触压力和峰值接触压力。统计分析包括双向重复测量方差分析,以评估半月板状态和膝关节屈曲对生物力学结果的影响。结果:节段性内侧半月板缺损显著增加挤压(0°时+1.32 mm;+1.45 mm在30°;60°时+1.42 mm;与完整半月板在所有屈曲角度上的平均压力相比,在90°时增加了1.67 mm。节段移植和全移植均可将挤压恢复到完整水平,全移植与节段移植相比,在屈曲角>;60°处的峰值压力有更好的改善。在屈曲角度≥30°时,节段性和全移植均可将峰值压力恢复到与完整半月板相当的水平。结论:手术时测试的半月板节段性和全半月板移植均可将半月板挤压和接触压力恢复到完整状态。临床意义:通过恢复膝关节功能和减少半月板挤压,节段性移植可能为治疗后内侧半月板缺陷提供了一种很有前途的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信