Making sugar out of opium: A narco-plantation regime in early modern Southeast Asia

IF 2.4 1区 历史学 Q1 HISTORY
Guanmian Xu, Shohei Okubo
{"title":"Making sugar out of opium: A narco-plantation regime in early modern Southeast Asia","authors":"Guanmian Xu, Shohei Okubo","doi":"10.1093/pastj/gtaf015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the early modern period, while slavery became firmly entrenched in the Atlantic’s sugar economies, Southeast Asia witnessed the rise of distinct plantation regimes. Unlike their Atlantic counterparts, these Asian plantation regimes relied not on enslavement but on addiction — particularly to opium smoking — as a means to control and exploit plantation labour. Existing research has highlighted how such opium-driven regimes, along with Asian ‘coolie’ labour, proliferated globally in the nineteenth century following the abolitionist movement. Yet, their early modern origins in Southeast Asia remain largely unexplored. As a result, a deep plantation labour history outside the Atlantic World is still lacking, and researchers often continue to essentialize early modern plantation capitalism as inherently tied to slavery, while overlooking other, often more insidious, forms of plantation labour control that existed beyond the Atlantic. This article seeks to address this gap by examining the emergence and development of a narco-plantation regime on the sugar frontier of rural Batavia (Jakarta) from the late seventeenth to the early nineteenth centuries.","PeriodicalId":47870,"journal":{"name":"Past & Present","volume":"135 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Past & Present","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/pastj/gtaf015","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the early modern period, while slavery became firmly entrenched in the Atlantic’s sugar economies, Southeast Asia witnessed the rise of distinct plantation regimes. Unlike their Atlantic counterparts, these Asian plantation regimes relied not on enslavement but on addiction — particularly to opium smoking — as a means to control and exploit plantation labour. Existing research has highlighted how such opium-driven regimes, along with Asian ‘coolie’ labour, proliferated globally in the nineteenth century following the abolitionist movement. Yet, their early modern origins in Southeast Asia remain largely unexplored. As a result, a deep plantation labour history outside the Atlantic World is still lacking, and researchers often continue to essentialize early modern plantation capitalism as inherently tied to slavery, while overlooking other, often more insidious, forms of plantation labour control that existed beyond the Atlantic. This article seeks to address this gap by examining the emergence and development of a narco-plantation regime on the sugar frontier of rural Batavia (Jakarta) from the late seventeenth to the early nineteenth centuries.
用鸦片制糖:近代早期东南亚的毒品种植制度
在近代早期,当奴隶制在大西洋的制糖经济中根深蒂固时,东南亚见证了不同种植园制度的兴起。与大西洋国家不同,这些亚洲种植园政权不是依靠奴役,而是依靠上瘾——尤其是吸食鸦片——作为控制和剥削种植园劳动力的手段。现有的研究强调了这种鸦片驱动的政权,以及亚洲的“苦力”劳工,是如何在19世纪废奴运动之后在全球范围内扩散的。然而,它们在东南亚的早期现代起源在很大程度上仍未被探索。因此,大西洋世界以外的种植园劳动力历史仍然缺乏深入的研究,研究人员经常继续将早期现代种植园资本主义本质上与奴隶制联系在一起,而忽视了大西洋以外存在的其他形式的种植园劳动力控制,这些形式往往更阴险。本文试图通过考察17世纪末至19世纪初巴达维亚(雅加达)农村糖业前沿的毒品种植园政权的出现和发展来解决这一差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Past & Present
Past & Present Multiple-
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
5.60%
发文量
49
期刊介绍: Founded in 1952, Past & Present is widely acknowledged to be the liveliest and most stimulating historical journal in the English-speaking world. The journal offers: •A wide variety of scholarly and original articles on historical, social and cultural change in all parts of the world. •Four issues a year, each containing five or six major articles plus occasional debates and review essays. •Challenging work by young historians as well as seminal articles by internationally regarded scholars. •A range of articles that appeal to specialists and non-specialists, and communicate the results of the most recent historical research in a readable and lively form. •A forum for debate, encouraging productive controversy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信