Impact of fasting duration on LDL cholesterol concentrations estimated by the Friedewald, Martin-Hopkins, and Sampson/NIH equations.

Biochemia medica Pub Date : 2025-06-15 Epub Date: 2025-04-15 DOI:10.11613/BM.2025.020704
Şerif Ercan, Ali Manav
{"title":"Impact of fasting duration on LDL cholesterol concentrations estimated by the Friedewald, Martin-Hopkins, and Sampson/NIH equations.","authors":"Şerif Ercan, Ali Manav","doi":"10.11613/BM.2025.020704","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>A paradigm shift is occurring in lipid testing, as fasting is no longer required. We aimed to determine whether low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) concentrations calculated using three different equations, along with the components used in these calculations, vary with different fasting durations in routine clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The concentrations of LDL-C were calculated using the Friedewald, Martin-Hopkins, and Sampson/NIH equations, along with the lipid components involved in these equations, depending on time since the last meal in a cohort of 77,300 outpatients at a community hospital. The study population was divided into groups according to fasting durations by 2-hour intervals. A general linear model was applied to identify differences between fasting and nonfasting groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Regardless of the calculation method, LDL-C concentrations varied with fasting duration for up to 8-10 hours. The greatest absolute mean differences in LDL-C concentrations between fasting and nonfasting states were - 0.32, - 0.30, and - 0.26 mmol/L when using the Friedewald, Sampson/NIH, and Martin-Hopkins equations, respectively. Among the equation components, triglyceride concentrations were the most sensitive to fasting duration, remaining elevated for 4-6 hours after the last meal, while total cholesterol and non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) concentrations decreased for up to 8-10 hours postprandially. However, HDL-C concentrations remained relatively stable.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The variation in postprandial LDL-C concentrations was observed not to differ between the three calculation methods and reached negligible concentrations after at least 8 hours of fasting. If LDL-C concentrations measured in a nonfasting state are near clinical decision thresholds, subsequent lipid measurement should be performed in a fasting state.</p>","PeriodicalId":94370,"journal":{"name":"Biochemia medica","volume":"35 2","pages":"020704"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12131409/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biochemia medica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11613/BM.2025.020704","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: A paradigm shift is occurring in lipid testing, as fasting is no longer required. We aimed to determine whether low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) concentrations calculated using three different equations, along with the components used in these calculations, vary with different fasting durations in routine clinical practice.

Materials and methods: The concentrations of LDL-C were calculated using the Friedewald, Martin-Hopkins, and Sampson/NIH equations, along with the lipid components involved in these equations, depending on time since the last meal in a cohort of 77,300 outpatients at a community hospital. The study population was divided into groups according to fasting durations by 2-hour intervals. A general linear model was applied to identify differences between fasting and nonfasting groups.

Results: Regardless of the calculation method, LDL-C concentrations varied with fasting duration for up to 8-10 hours. The greatest absolute mean differences in LDL-C concentrations between fasting and nonfasting states were - 0.32, - 0.30, and - 0.26 mmol/L when using the Friedewald, Sampson/NIH, and Martin-Hopkins equations, respectively. Among the equation components, triglyceride concentrations were the most sensitive to fasting duration, remaining elevated for 4-6 hours after the last meal, while total cholesterol and non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) concentrations decreased for up to 8-10 hours postprandially. However, HDL-C concentrations remained relatively stable.

Conclusions: The variation in postprandial LDL-C concentrations was observed not to differ between the three calculation methods and reached negligible concentrations after at least 8 hours of fasting. If LDL-C concentrations measured in a nonfasting state are near clinical decision thresholds, subsequent lipid measurement should be performed in a fasting state.

根据Friedewald、Martin-Hopkins和Sampson/NIH方程估算的空腹时间对LDL胆固醇浓度的影响。
简介:血脂检测正在发生范式转变,因为不再需要禁食。我们的目的是确定低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C)浓度是否使用三种不同的公式计算,以及这些计算中使用的成分,随着常规临床实践中不同的禁食时间而变化。材料和方法:使用Friedewald, Martin-Hopkins和Sampson/NIH方程计算LDL-C浓度,以及这些方程中涉及的脂质成分,这取决于从最后一餐开始的时间,在社区医院的77,300名门诊患者中。研究人群根据禁食时间每隔2小时被分成几组。采用一般线性模型来确定禁食组和非禁食组之间的差异。结果:无论采用何种计算方法,LDL-C浓度随禁食时间的变化可达8-10小时。当使用Friedewald、Sampson/NIH和Martin-Hopkins方程时,空腹和非空腹状态之间LDL-C浓度的最大绝对平均差异分别为- 0.32、- 0.30和- 0.26 mmol/L。在方程式成分中,甘油三酯浓度对禁食时间最敏感,在最后一餐后4-6小时内保持升高,而总胆固醇和非高密度脂蛋白胆固醇(HDL-C)浓度在餐后8-10小时内下降。然而,HDL-C浓度保持相对稳定。结论:观察到餐后LDL-C浓度的变化在三种计算方法之间没有差异,并且在禁食至少8小时后达到可忽略不计的浓度。如果在非禁食状态下测量的LDL-C浓度接近临床判定阈值,则应在禁食状态下进行随后的脂质测量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信