Neuropsychological assessment in cognitively healthy nonagenarians and centenarians: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis

IF 3.9
Carlotta Gualco , Paola Del Sette , Carlo Chiorri , Emilio Di Maria
{"title":"Neuropsychological assessment in cognitively healthy nonagenarians and centenarians: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Carlotta Gualco ,&nbsp;Paola Del Sette ,&nbsp;Carlo Chiorri ,&nbsp;Emilio Di Maria","doi":"10.1016/j.exger.2025.112796","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The assessment of cognitive impairment in individuals aged 90 years and older is based on normative data estimated in the younger elderly. A first systematic review had provided the reference values in the oldest population for a few neuropsychological tests. Robust estimations on additional cohorts are needed.</div><div>We designed a systematic review update (PROSPERO: CRD42022347327) encompassing the literature published from 2015 to June 2024, to include studies reporting raw neuropsychological test scores from at least ten individuals aged &gt;90 without dementia. All types of cohort studies were eligible. The data set from the previously published systematic review and the studies retrieved in the update process were pooled. Random effect meta-analysis was applied to estimate the updated mean and cut-off values.</div><div>The systematic workflow provided 11 articles eligible for data abstraction. Based on the pooled data we estimated the updated reference scores for MMSE, BNT-SF, Semantic Fluency, TMT-A, TMT-B, Digit span forward and Digit span backward. Moreover, we estimated for the first time the reference values for the Word List Immediate and Word List Delayed tasks.</div><div>The systematic review provided an updated set of norms for the neuropsychological test that are frequently used to assess the cognitive profile in individuals aged &gt;90 years. The heterogeneity of the assessments limited the quantitative synthesis. Further studies on large cohorts are needed to stratify the normative values by age, gender and education. The identification of country- and population-specific values would help clinicians and researchers to characterise the cognitive profile in the oldest old individuals.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":94003,"journal":{"name":"Experimental gerontology","volume":"208 ","pages":"Article 112796"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Experimental gerontology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0531556525001251","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The assessment of cognitive impairment in individuals aged 90 years and older is based on normative data estimated in the younger elderly. A first systematic review had provided the reference values in the oldest population for a few neuropsychological tests. Robust estimations on additional cohorts are needed.
We designed a systematic review update (PROSPERO: CRD42022347327) encompassing the literature published from 2015 to June 2024, to include studies reporting raw neuropsychological test scores from at least ten individuals aged >90 without dementia. All types of cohort studies were eligible. The data set from the previously published systematic review and the studies retrieved in the update process were pooled. Random effect meta-analysis was applied to estimate the updated mean and cut-off values.
The systematic workflow provided 11 articles eligible for data abstraction. Based on the pooled data we estimated the updated reference scores for MMSE, BNT-SF, Semantic Fluency, TMT-A, TMT-B, Digit span forward and Digit span backward. Moreover, we estimated for the first time the reference values for the Word List Immediate and Word List Delayed tasks.
The systematic review provided an updated set of norms for the neuropsychological test that are frequently used to assess the cognitive profile in individuals aged >90 years. The heterogeneity of the assessments limited the quantitative synthesis. Further studies on large cohorts are needed to stratify the normative values by age, gender and education. The identification of country- and population-specific values would help clinicians and researchers to characterise the cognitive profile in the oldest old individuals.
认知健康的九十岁和百岁老人的神经心理学评估:最新的系统回顾和荟萃分析。
对90岁 及以上个体认知障碍的评估是基于对年轻老年人的规范数据估计。第一次系统评价为老年人群的一些神经心理测试提供了参考值。需要对其他队列进行可靠的估计。我们设计了一项系统评价更新(PROSPERO: CRD42022347327),涵盖了2015年至2024年6月发表的文献,包括报告至少10名年龄在10岁至90岁之间无痴呆患者的原始神经心理测试分数的研究。所有类型的队列研究均符合条件。将先前发表的系统综述的数据集和更新过程中检索到的研究进行汇总。随机效应荟萃分析用于估计更新后的平均值和截止值。系统工作流提供了11篇符合数据抽象条件的文章。根据汇总的数据,我们估计了MMSE、BNT-SF、语义流畅性、TMT-A、TMTB、向前数字跨度和向后数字跨度的更新参考分数。此外,我们首次估计了词表即时任务和词表延迟任务的参考值。该系统综述为神经心理测试提供了一套更新的规范,该测试经常用于评估bb0 - 90 岁个体的认知概况。评价的异质性限制了定量综合。需要对大量人群进行进一步研究,以按年龄、性别和教育程度对规范值进行分层。确定国家和人口特定值将有助于临床医生和研究人员描述最年长的老年人的认知概况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Experimental gerontology
Experimental gerontology Ageing, Biochemistry, Geriatrics and Gerontology
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
66 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信