Kelsey D Frederick, Catherine M Crill, James S Wheeler, Kenneth C Hohmeier, Lauren Bivacca, Michael J Rouse, Jennifer L Baumgartner, Dawn E Havrda
{"title":"Implementation and Effectiveness of an Immersive Continuing Professional Development Elective for Student Pharmacists during the COVID-19 Pandemic.","authors":"Kelsey D Frederick, Catherine M Crill, James S Wheeler, Kenneth C Hohmeier, Lauren Bivacca, Michael J Rouse, Jennifer L Baumgartner, Dawn E Havrda","doi":"10.1016/j.ajpe.2025.101428","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine the implementation and effectiveness of a continuing professional development (CPD) elective for fourth-year student pharmacists.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A 4-week, remote CPD elective was developed and implemented during the COVID-19 pandemic for the Class of 2021. Students worked through each step of the CPD cycle, logged activities that facilitated achievement of self-identified goals, and submitted a final CPD portfolio and written reflection describing their experience applying the CPD approach. Data were collected using in-depth, semi-structured interviews and electronic, web-based surveys. Early implementation outcomes measured included acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility. The interview guide was based on the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All CPD elective students (100%, n=80) completed course requirements and surveys and passed the course. Implementation outcomes were 83.4% acceptability, 93% appropriateness, and 86.6% feasibility. Students reported full (62.9%) or partial (35%) achievement of self-identified goals and satisfaction with their learning outcomes (92.5%). Compared to Class of 2021 students not taking the elective, CPD elective students were more likely to have used a structured tool to identify professional strengths, areas of improvement, and learning opportunities, and to document a learning plan to achieve their goals. Twelve students participated in interviews. Students responded positively to the CPD experience and recognized the value of CPD training in achieving professional goals and preparing for lifelong learning. Participants appreciated the personalization, autonomy, and flexibility the elective offered, which increased perceived motivation and engagement in the learning process.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The CPD elective provided an acceptable, appropriate, feasible, and effective CPD experience within the PharmD curriculum. Findings may be used to support development of future CPD activities within pharmacy education.</p>","PeriodicalId":55530,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education","volume":" ","pages":"101428"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajpe.2025.101428","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To examine the implementation and effectiveness of a continuing professional development (CPD) elective for fourth-year student pharmacists.
Methods: A 4-week, remote CPD elective was developed and implemented during the COVID-19 pandemic for the Class of 2021. Students worked through each step of the CPD cycle, logged activities that facilitated achievement of self-identified goals, and submitted a final CPD portfolio and written reflection describing their experience applying the CPD approach. Data were collected using in-depth, semi-structured interviews and electronic, web-based surveys. Early implementation outcomes measured included acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility. The interview guide was based on the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR).
Results: All CPD elective students (100%, n=80) completed course requirements and surveys and passed the course. Implementation outcomes were 83.4% acceptability, 93% appropriateness, and 86.6% feasibility. Students reported full (62.9%) or partial (35%) achievement of self-identified goals and satisfaction with their learning outcomes (92.5%). Compared to Class of 2021 students not taking the elective, CPD elective students were more likely to have used a structured tool to identify professional strengths, areas of improvement, and learning opportunities, and to document a learning plan to achieve their goals. Twelve students participated in interviews. Students responded positively to the CPD experience and recognized the value of CPD training in achieving professional goals and preparing for lifelong learning. Participants appreciated the personalization, autonomy, and flexibility the elective offered, which increased perceived motivation and engagement in the learning process.
Conclusion: The CPD elective provided an acceptable, appropriate, feasible, and effective CPD experience within the PharmD curriculum. Findings may be used to support development of future CPD activities within pharmacy education.
期刊介绍:
The Journal accepts unsolicited manuscripts that have not been published and are not under consideration for publication elsewhere. The Journal only considers material related to pharmaceutical education for publication. Authors must prepare manuscripts to conform to the Journal style (Author Instructions). All manuscripts are subject to peer review and approval by the editor prior to acceptance for publication. Reviewers are assigned by the editor with the advice of the editorial board as needed. Manuscripts are submitted and processed online (Submit a Manuscript) using Editorial Manager, an online manuscript tracking system that facilitates communication between the editorial office, editor, associate editors, reviewers, and authors.
After a manuscript is accepted, it is scheduled for publication in an upcoming issue of the Journal. All manuscripts are formatted and copyedited, and returned to the author for review and approval of the changes. Approximately 2 weeks prior to publication, the author receives an electronic proof of the article for final review and approval. Authors are not assessed page charges for publication.