Enhanced Human Crawling Phase Recognition Based on Kinematic Synergies and Machine Learning.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q4 BIOPHYSICS
Qiliang Xiong, Xiaolong Shu, Bo Liu, Ying Chen
{"title":"Enhanced Human Crawling Phase Recognition Based on Kinematic Synergies and Machine Learning.","authors":"Qiliang Xiong, Xiaolong Shu, Bo Liu, Ying Chen","doi":"10.1115/1.4068865","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hands-and-knees crawling, an effective rehabilitation method for children with motor impairments, requires precise phase detection for optimizing assistive devices. However, research on phase detection in human crawling remains limited. The research explores whether multi-joint kinematic synergy features provide better accuracy than traditional time-domain features.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Nine healthy adults participated in the study, where accelerometers and pressure sensors were used to capture motion data during crawling. The data were pre-processed and used to define four distinct phases of crawling and kinematic synergy features were extracted using Singular Value Decomposition (SVD)-based Principal Component Analysis (PCA). Machine learning models, including Classification and Regression Trees (CART), K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), and Error-Correcting Output Codes Support Vector Machines (ECOC-SVM), were trained to recognize the crawling phases. Their performance was compared to that of time-domain features.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The phase recognition method based on multi-joint kinematic synergies achieved an average accuracy of 89.37%. Specifically, the accuracy for CART was 88.41%, for KNN was 85.51%, and for ECOC-SVM was 94.20%. In comparison, the phase recognition using traditional time-domain features yielded lower accuracy, with overall accuracies of 78.98% for CART, 76.09% for KNN, and 85.51% for ECOC-SVM Conclusion: The findings demonstrate that using kinematic synergy features significantly improves the accuracy of crawling phase recognition compared to traditional time-domain features. This research provides valuable insights into the design and control of rehabilitation robots based on human kinematic synergies.</p>","PeriodicalId":54871,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Biomechanical Engineering-Transactions of the Asme","volume":" ","pages":"1-44"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Biomechanical Engineering-Transactions of the Asme","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4068865","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Hands-and-knees crawling, an effective rehabilitation method for children with motor impairments, requires precise phase detection for optimizing assistive devices. However, research on phase detection in human crawling remains limited. The research explores whether multi-joint kinematic synergy features provide better accuracy than traditional time-domain features.

Methods: Nine healthy adults participated in the study, where accelerometers and pressure sensors were used to capture motion data during crawling. The data were pre-processed and used to define four distinct phases of crawling and kinematic synergy features were extracted using Singular Value Decomposition (SVD)-based Principal Component Analysis (PCA). Machine learning models, including Classification and Regression Trees (CART), K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), and Error-Correcting Output Codes Support Vector Machines (ECOC-SVM), were trained to recognize the crawling phases. Their performance was compared to that of time-domain features.

Results: The phase recognition method based on multi-joint kinematic synergies achieved an average accuracy of 89.37%. Specifically, the accuracy for CART was 88.41%, for KNN was 85.51%, and for ECOC-SVM was 94.20%. In comparison, the phase recognition using traditional time-domain features yielded lower accuracy, with overall accuracies of 78.98% for CART, 76.09% for KNN, and 85.51% for ECOC-SVM Conclusion: The findings demonstrate that using kinematic synergy features significantly improves the accuracy of crawling phase recognition compared to traditional time-domain features. This research provides valuable insights into the design and control of rehabilitation robots based on human kinematic synergies.

基于运动协同和机器学习的增强人类爬行阶段识别。
背景:手膝爬行是一种有效的儿童运动障碍康复方法,需要精确的相位检测来优化辅助装置。然而,对人类爬行的相位检测研究仍然有限。研究探讨了多关节运动协同特征是否比传统的时域特征提供更好的精度。方法:9名健康成人参与研究,使用加速度计和压力传感器捕捉爬行过程中的运动数据。对数据进行预处理,用于定义爬行的四个不同阶段,并使用基于奇异值分解(SVD)的主成分分析(PCA)提取运动学协同特征。机器学习模型,包括分类与回归树(CART)、k近邻(KNN)和纠错输出码支持向量机(ECOC-SVM),被训练来识别爬行阶段。将其性能与时域特征进行了比较。结果:基于多关节运动协同的相位识别方法平均准确率为89.37%。其中CART的准确率为88.41%,KNN的准确率为85.51%,eco - svm的准确率为94.20%。相比之下,使用传统时域特征的相位识别准确率较低,CART的总体准确率为78.98%,KNN为76.09%,ECOC-SVM为85.51%。结论:研究结果表明,与传统时域特征相比,使用运动学协同特征显著提高了爬行相位识别的准确率。这项研究为基于人体运动协同的康复机器人的设计和控制提供了有价值的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.90%
发文量
169
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Artificial Organs and Prostheses; Bioinstrumentation and Measurements; Bioheat Transfer; Biomaterials; Biomechanics; Bioprocess Engineering; Cellular Mechanics; Design and Control of Biological Systems; Physiological Systems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信