Acute Effects of Dynamic and Ballistic Stretching on Flexibility: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

IF 2.4 2区 医学 Q2 SPORT SCIENCES
Shingo Matsuo, Kosuke Takeuchi, Masatoshi Nakamura, Taizan Fukaya, Kensuke Oba, Gakuto Nakao, Takamasa Mizuno
{"title":"Acute Effects of Dynamic and Ballistic Stretching on Flexibility: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.","authors":"Shingo Matsuo, Kosuke Takeuchi, Masatoshi Nakamura, Taizan Fukaya, Kensuke Oba, Gakuto Nakao, Takamasa Mizuno","doi":"10.52082/jssm.2025.463","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Dynamic stretching (DS) uses a controlled movement through the range of motion (ROM) of the active joint(s) by contracting the agonist muscles without being held in an end position. In contrast, ballistic stretching (BS) typically uses uncontrolled movements of a higher velocity with bouncing actions. However, BS is often considered to be a form of DS. When considered together, DS and BS reportedly increase flexibility, evidenced by single- and multiple-joint ROM improvements and other measurements. However, a meta-analysis with subgroup analyses revealing the acute effects of DS and BS on flexibility in detail, independently of other stretching methods, has yet to be conducted. The purpose of this meta-analysis was to investigate the acute effects of DS and BS on flexibility in healthy participants. The PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus databases were searched for eligible papers published before September 9, 2024; 17 papers were included in the meta-analysis. The main meta-analysis was performed with a random-effect model, and subgroup analyses were performed to examine the effects of age (young vs. middle-aged and older), sex (male vs. mixed sex), stretching methods (DS vs. BS), stretched muscles (hamstrings vs. plantar flexors vs. multiple muscles), and flexibility outcomes (single-joint ROM vs. straight-leg raise test vs. sit-and-reach test). A small increase in flexibility was found following DS and BS (considered together) (effect size = 0.372, Z = 3.936, 95% confidence interval = 0.187-0.557, p < 0.001, I<sup>2</sup> = 27%). Subgroup analyses revealed no significant differences between age (p = 0.24), sex (p = 0.76), stretching method (p = 0.83), stretched muscle (p = 0.20), or flexibility outcome (p = 0.34) groups. Our results suggest that DS and BS effectively provide acute, small-magnitude improvements in flexibility that are not significantly affected by individual characteristics, stretching methods, stretched muscles, or flexibility outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":54765,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sports Science and Medicine","volume":"24 2","pages":"463-474"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12131144/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sports Science and Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52082/jssm.2025.463","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Dynamic stretching (DS) uses a controlled movement through the range of motion (ROM) of the active joint(s) by contracting the agonist muscles without being held in an end position. In contrast, ballistic stretching (BS) typically uses uncontrolled movements of a higher velocity with bouncing actions. However, BS is often considered to be a form of DS. When considered together, DS and BS reportedly increase flexibility, evidenced by single- and multiple-joint ROM improvements and other measurements. However, a meta-analysis with subgroup analyses revealing the acute effects of DS and BS on flexibility in detail, independently of other stretching methods, has yet to be conducted. The purpose of this meta-analysis was to investigate the acute effects of DS and BS on flexibility in healthy participants. The PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus databases were searched for eligible papers published before September 9, 2024; 17 papers were included in the meta-analysis. The main meta-analysis was performed with a random-effect model, and subgroup analyses were performed to examine the effects of age (young vs. middle-aged and older), sex (male vs. mixed sex), stretching methods (DS vs. BS), stretched muscles (hamstrings vs. plantar flexors vs. multiple muscles), and flexibility outcomes (single-joint ROM vs. straight-leg raise test vs. sit-and-reach test). A small increase in flexibility was found following DS and BS (considered together) (effect size = 0.372, Z = 3.936, 95% confidence interval = 0.187-0.557, p < 0.001, I2 = 27%). Subgroup analyses revealed no significant differences between age (p = 0.24), sex (p = 0.76), stretching method (p = 0.83), stretched muscle (p = 0.20), or flexibility outcome (p = 0.34) groups. Our results suggest that DS and BS effectively provide acute, small-magnitude improvements in flexibility that are not significantly affected by individual characteristics, stretching methods, stretched muscles, or flexibility outcomes.

动态和弹道拉伸对柔韧性的急性影响:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
动态拉伸(DS)通过收缩激动肌来控制活动关节的活动范围(ROM),而不保持在一个结束位置。相比之下,弹道拉伸(BS)通常使用不受控制的高速度运动和弹跳动作。然而,BS通常被认为是DS的一种形式。综合考虑,DS和BS增加了灵活性,单关节和多关节ROM改进和其他测量证明了这一点。然而,一项亚组分析的荟萃分析尚未进行,该分析独立于其他拉伸方法,详细揭示了DS和BS对灵活性的急性影响。本荟萃分析的目的是调查DS和BS对健康参与者灵活性的急性影响。在PubMed、Web of Science和Scopus数据库中检索2024年9月9日之前发表的符合条件的论文;17篇论文被纳入meta分析。采用随机效应模型进行主要荟萃分析,并进行亚组分析,以检查年龄(青年、中年和老年)、性别(男性、男女混合)、拉伸方法(DS vs BS)、拉伸肌肉(腘绳肌、足底屈肌、多块肌肉)和柔韧性结果(单关节ROM、直腿抬腿试验、坐伸试验)的影响。采用DS和BS(一起考虑)后,柔韧性有小幅增加(效应值= 0.372,Z = 3.936, 95%置信区间= 0.187-0.557,p < 0.001, I2 = 27%)。亚组分析显示,年龄(p = 0.24)、性别(p = 0.76)、拉伸方法(p = 0.83)、拉伸肌肉(p = 0.20)或柔韧性结果(p = 0.34)组之间无显著差异。我们的研究结果表明,DS和BS有效地提供了急性、小幅度的灵活性改善,而不受个体特征、拉伸方法、拉伸肌肉或灵活性结果的显著影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
6.20%
发文量
56
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Sports Science and Medicine (JSSM) is a non-profit making scientific electronic journal, publishing research and review articles, together with case studies, in the fields of sports medicine and the exercise sciences. JSSM is published quarterly in March, June, September and December. JSSM also publishes editorials, a "letter to the editor" section, abstracts from international and national congresses, panel meetings, conferences and symposia, and can function as an open discussion forum on significant issues of current interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信