Estimating the impact of non-pharmaceutical interventions on COVID mortality using reductions in influenza mortality as an effect indicator.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Robert D Morris
{"title":"Estimating the impact of non-pharmaceutical interventions on COVID mortality using reductions in influenza mortality as an effect indicator.","authors":"Robert D Morris","doi":"10.1057/s41271-025-00570-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study uses influenza mortality reduction (IMR) as an indicator of the aggregate effect of non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPI's) on the spread of respiratory infections to assess their impact on COVID mortality. Age-adjusted COVID mortality for US states were modeled using four variables: COVID mortality prior to introduction of NPI's, vaccination rates, IMR relative to 2016-2019, and population density. A simple linear model of the entire pandemic with only these variables explained 66% of the variability in COVID mortality with IMRs affecting the first two years and vaccination having an impact in the second and third year. A counterfactual model of no NPI's suggests they prevented 850,000 COVID related deaths in the United States. These results support the use of IMR's as an indicator of the aggregate impact of NPIs for controlling transmission of respiratory infections, including COVID and suggest that COVID mortality would have been almost 75% higher without them.</p>","PeriodicalId":50070,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Public Health Policy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Public Health Policy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1057/s41271-025-00570-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study uses influenza mortality reduction (IMR) as an indicator of the aggregate effect of non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPI's) on the spread of respiratory infections to assess their impact on COVID mortality. Age-adjusted COVID mortality for US states were modeled using four variables: COVID mortality prior to introduction of NPI's, vaccination rates, IMR relative to 2016-2019, and population density. A simple linear model of the entire pandemic with only these variables explained 66% of the variability in COVID mortality with IMRs affecting the first two years and vaccination having an impact in the second and third year. A counterfactual model of no NPI's suggests they prevented 850,000 COVID related deaths in the United States. These results support the use of IMR's as an indicator of the aggregate impact of NPIs for controlling transmission of respiratory infections, including COVID and suggest that COVID mortality would have been almost 75% higher without them.

以流感死亡率降低作为效果指标,估计非药物干预措施对COVID - 19死亡率的影响。
本研究使用流感死亡率降低(IMR)作为非药物干预措施(NPI)对呼吸道感染传播的总体效应的指标,以评估其对COVID死亡率的影响。使用四个变量对美国各州年龄调整后的COVID死亡率进行了建模:引入NPI之前的COVID死亡率、疫苗接种率、相对于2016-2019年的IMR和人口密度。仅包含这些变量的整个大流行的简单线性模型解释了66%的COVID死亡率变异性,其中IMRs影响头两年,疫苗接种影响第二年和第三年。一个没有NPI的反事实模型表明,他们在美国阻止了85万例与COVID相关的死亡。这些结果支持使用IMR作为npi对控制呼吸道感染(包括COVID)传播的总体影响的指标,并表明如果没有IMR, COVID死亡率将高出近75%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Public Health Policy
Journal of Public Health Policy 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
2.60%
发文量
62
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Public Health Policy (JPHP) will continue its 35 year tradition: an accessible source of scholarly articles on the epidemiologic and social foundations of public health policy, rigorously edited, and progressive. JPHP aims to create a more inclusive public health policy dialogue, within nations and among them. It broadens public health policy debates beyond the ''health system'' to examine all forces and environments that impinge on the health of populations. It provides an exciting platform for airing controversy and framing policy debates - honing policies to solve new problems and unresolved old ones. JPHP welcomes unsolicited original scientific and policy contributions on all public health topics. New authors are particularly encouraged to enter debates about how to improve the health of populations and reduce health disparities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信