Comparative accuracy of fine-needle aspiration cytology between larger and smaller size thyroid nodules.

IF 3.1 4区 医学 Q2 PATHOLOGY
Cytojournal Pub Date : 2025-04-17 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.25259/Cytojournal_206_2024
Saad Samargandy, Yousef Zaki Khedher, Shaza Ahmed Samargandy, Ghaida Ahmed Alzahrani, Hesham Tariq Nahhas, Mohammed Abdulrahman Alshaikh, Khalid Abdulaziz Alzahrani, Samah Saharti
{"title":"Comparative accuracy of fine-needle aspiration cytology between larger and smaller size thyroid nodules.","authors":"Saad Samargandy, Yousef Zaki Khedher, Shaza Ahmed Samargandy, Ghaida Ahmed Alzahrani, Hesham Tariq Nahhas, Mohammed Abdulrahman Alshaikh, Khalid Abdulaziz Alzahrani, Samah Saharti","doi":"10.25259/Cytojournal_206_2024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Thyroid nodules are frequently encountered in medical practice. Fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) is used to rule out malignant nodules, but few studies have questioned the accuracy of FNAC in larger thyroid nodules compared to smaller ones. We, therefore, aim to compare the diagnostic performance of FNAC based on nodule size and whether larger nodule size increases the possibility of obtaining indeterminate or non-diagnostic results.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Adult patients with thyroid nodules who underwent thyroid biopsy and surgery from 2016 to 2022 were included in the study. We assessed the proportion of benign, malignant, indeterminate, and non-diagnostic FNAC in relation to the nodule size. We then divided cytology into true positive (malignant FNAC and histology), and true negative (benign FNAC and histology) and examined whether the proportion of true FNAC would be affected by different thyroid nodule cutoffs. The study used mean and frequency to describe continuous and categorical variables. <i>t</i>-test and Chi-square tests were used to compare statistics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three hundred and forty-five patients were included in the study. The majority were female (86.7%) and older than 40 years. Half had a benign histology; the other 50% were malignant. The majority (49.3%) had indeterminate thyroid cytology. The proportion of indeterminate or non-diagnostic FNAC was the same (58%) in nodules ≥4 cm and <4 cm. The proportion of true FNAC was similar between different nodule size categories. It was 35% in ≥4 cm, and 34.3% in <4 cm nodules.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study found that the diagnostic performance of FNAC in thyroid nodules did not significantly differ based on nodule size, with similar rates of indeterminate or non-diagnostic results across different size categories. The proportion of true positive FNAC results also remained consistent regardless of nodule size.</p>","PeriodicalId":49082,"journal":{"name":"Cytojournal","volume":"22 ","pages":"44"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12134855/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cytojournal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25259/Cytojournal_206_2024","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Thyroid nodules are frequently encountered in medical practice. Fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) is used to rule out malignant nodules, but few studies have questioned the accuracy of FNAC in larger thyroid nodules compared to smaller ones. We, therefore, aim to compare the diagnostic performance of FNAC based on nodule size and whether larger nodule size increases the possibility of obtaining indeterminate or non-diagnostic results.

Material and methods: Adult patients with thyroid nodules who underwent thyroid biopsy and surgery from 2016 to 2022 were included in the study. We assessed the proportion of benign, malignant, indeterminate, and non-diagnostic FNAC in relation to the nodule size. We then divided cytology into true positive (malignant FNAC and histology), and true negative (benign FNAC and histology) and examined whether the proportion of true FNAC would be affected by different thyroid nodule cutoffs. The study used mean and frequency to describe continuous and categorical variables. t-test and Chi-square tests were used to compare statistics.

Results: Three hundred and forty-five patients were included in the study. The majority were female (86.7%) and older than 40 years. Half had a benign histology; the other 50% were malignant. The majority (49.3%) had indeterminate thyroid cytology. The proportion of indeterminate or non-diagnostic FNAC was the same (58%) in nodules ≥4 cm and <4 cm. The proportion of true FNAC was similar between different nodule size categories. It was 35% in ≥4 cm, and 34.3% in <4 cm nodules.

Conclusion: The study found that the diagnostic performance of FNAC in thyroid nodules did not significantly differ based on nodule size, with similar rates of indeterminate or non-diagnostic results across different size categories. The proportion of true positive FNAC results also remained consistent regardless of nodule size.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

细针穿刺细胞学检查大、小甲状腺结节的比较准确性。
目的:甲状腺结节是医疗实践中常见的结节。细针穿刺细胞学(FNAC)用于排除恶性结节,但很少有研究质疑FNAC在较大甲状腺结节中的准确性。因此,我们的目的是比较基于结节大小的FNAC的诊断性能,以及更大的结节大小是否会增加获得不确定或非诊断结果的可能性。材料与方法:2016 - 2022年接受甲状腺活检和手术的成年甲状腺结节患者纳入研究。我们评估了与结节大小相关的良性、恶性、不确定和非诊断性FNAC的比例。然后我们将细胞学分为真阳性(恶性FNAC和组织学)和真阴性(良性FNAC和组织学),并检查不同甲状腺结节切断是否会影响真FNAC的比例。该研究使用均值和频率来描述连续变量和分类变量。统计量比较采用t检验和卡方检验。结果:345例患者纳入研究。以40岁以上女性居多(86.7%)。一半为良性组织学;另外50%是恶性的。大多数(49.3%)甲状腺细胞学不确定。结论:本研究发现,FNAC在甲状腺结节中的诊断性能并没有因结节大小而有显著差异,在不同大小类别中,FNAC的不确定或不可诊断的结果比例相似。无论结节大小,FNAC真阳性结果的比例也保持一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cytojournal
Cytojournal PATHOLOGY-
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
42.10%
发文量
56
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The CytoJournal is an open-access peer-reviewed journal committed to publishing high-quality articles in the field of Diagnostic Cytopathology including Molecular aspects. The journal is owned by the Cytopathology Foundation and published by the Scientific Scholar.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信