Gender-Affirming Hormone Therapy, Quality of Life, and the Role of Oestradiol and Testosterone in Transgender Individuals.

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES
E E S Petersen, F Kiy, U S Kesmodel, M L Pop, G Kjaersdam Telléus, A Stensballe, J Dal, A Højgaard, M Winterdahl
{"title":"Gender-Affirming Hormone Therapy, Quality of Life, and the Role of Oestradiol and Testosterone in Transgender Individuals.","authors":"E E S Petersen, F Kiy, U S Kesmodel, M L Pop, G Kjaersdam Telléus, A Stensballe, J Dal, A Højgaard, M Winterdahl","doi":"10.1017/neu.2025.10018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The present study examines the quality of life (QoL) of transgender and gender-diverse individuals receiving versus not receiving gender-affirming hormone therapy (GAHT) in those assigned male at birth (AMAB) and assigned female at birth (AFAB). It also explores the relationship between QoL and concentrations of oestradiol and testosterone.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study used the WHOQOL-BREF questionnaire to assess QoL. Participants were categorised into four groups based on assigned sex at birth (AMAB or AFAB) and GAHT status, with non-GAHT participants serving as controls. MANOVA and t-tests were used to compare QoL between groups, and linear regression analyses examined associations between QoL and oestradiol/testosterone concentrations in AMAB and AFAB participants.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 360 participants: 169 AMAB (143 GAHT, 26 controls) and 191 AFAB (141 GAHT, 50 controls). GAHT recipients had significantly higher QoL than controls in both AMAB (p < 0.01) and AFAB (p = 0.02) groups, particularly in the psychological health domain (D2). AFAB participants reported higher overall QoL than AMAB in both GAHT (p = 0.01) and control (p = 0.04) groups, with significance in the social domain among GAHT participants. No significant relationship was found between oestradiol concentrations and QoL for participants AMAB. However, a significant relationship between testosterone concentrations and QoL was observed only in the social relationship domain (D3) for participant AFAB.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study highlights the benefits of GAHT for QoL and differences in QoL between AMAB and AFAB individuals.</p>","PeriodicalId":48964,"journal":{"name":"Acta Neuropsychiatrica","volume":" ","pages":"1-29"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Neuropsychiatrica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/neu.2025.10018","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The present study examines the quality of life (QoL) of transgender and gender-diverse individuals receiving versus not receiving gender-affirming hormone therapy (GAHT) in those assigned male at birth (AMAB) and assigned female at birth (AFAB). It also explores the relationship between QoL and concentrations of oestradiol and testosterone.

Methods: This cross-sectional study used the WHOQOL-BREF questionnaire to assess QoL. Participants were categorised into four groups based on assigned sex at birth (AMAB or AFAB) and GAHT status, with non-GAHT participants serving as controls. MANOVA and t-tests were used to compare QoL between groups, and linear regression analyses examined associations between QoL and oestradiol/testosterone concentrations in AMAB and AFAB participants.

Results: The study included 360 participants: 169 AMAB (143 GAHT, 26 controls) and 191 AFAB (141 GAHT, 50 controls). GAHT recipients had significantly higher QoL than controls in both AMAB (p < 0.01) and AFAB (p = 0.02) groups, particularly in the psychological health domain (D2). AFAB participants reported higher overall QoL than AMAB in both GAHT (p = 0.01) and control (p = 0.04) groups, with significance in the social domain among GAHT participants. No significant relationship was found between oestradiol concentrations and QoL for participants AMAB. However, a significant relationship between testosterone concentrations and QoL was observed only in the social relationship domain (D3) for participant AFAB.

Conclusion: This study highlights the benefits of GAHT for QoL and differences in QoL between AMAB and AFAB individuals.

性别确认激素治疗,生活质量,以及雌二醇和睾酮在跨性别个体中的作用。
目的:本研究探讨了在出生时被指定为男性(AMAB)和出生时被指定为女性(AFAB)的跨性别和性别多样化个体接受与未接受性别确认激素治疗(GAHT)的生活质量(QoL)。它还探讨了生活质量与雌二醇和睾酮浓度之间的关系。方法:横断面研究采用WHOQOL-BREF问卷评估生活质量。参与者根据出生时指定的性别(AMAB或AFAB)和gaat状态分为四组,非gaat参与者作为对照组。使用方差分析和t检验比较各组之间的生活质量,并使用线性回归分析检查AMAB和AFAB参与者的生活质量与雌二醇/睾酮浓度之间的关系。结果:该研究包括360名参与者:AMAB 169人(GAHT 143人,对照组26人)和AFAB 191人(GAHT 141人,对照组50人)。在AMAB组(p < 0.01)和AFAB组(p = 0.02)中,GAHT受者的生活质量均显著高于对照组,尤其是在心理健康领域(D2)。在GAHT组(p = 0.01)和对照组(p = 0.04)中,AFAB组的总体生活质量均高于AMAB组(p = 0.01),在GAHT组参与者的社会领域中具有显著性。没有发现雌二醇浓度与参与者AMAB的生活质量之间存在显著关系。然而,睾酮浓度与生活质量之间的显著关系仅在参与者AFAB的社会关系领域(D3)中被观察到。结论:本研究强调了GAHT对生活质量的益处以及AMAB和AFAB个体生活质量的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Neuropsychiatrica
Acta Neuropsychiatrica NEUROSCIENCES-PSYCHIATRY
自引率
5.30%
发文量
30
期刊介绍: Acta Neuropsychiatrica is an international journal focussing on translational neuropsychiatry. It publishes high-quality original research papers and reviews. The Journal''s scope specifically highlights the pathway from discovery to clinical applications, healthcare and global health that can be viewed broadly as the spectrum of work that marks the pathway from discovery to global health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信