Repeat venous sinus stenting for management of recurrent sinus stenosis related treatment failure of idiopathic intracranial hypertension: A case series.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Kaishin Tanaka, Stephen Winters, Geoffrey D Parker, Rodney Allan, David Brunacci, Timothy Ang, Johnny Wong, Emma Harrison, Gabor M Halmagyi
{"title":"Repeat venous sinus stenting for management of recurrent sinus stenosis related treatment failure of idiopathic intracranial hypertension: A case series.","authors":"Kaishin Tanaka, Stephen Winters, Geoffrey D Parker, Rodney Allan, David Brunacci, Timothy Ang, Johnny Wong, Emma Harrison, Gabor M Halmagyi","doi":"10.1177/15910199251332396","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundDural venous sinus stenting (VSS) has been shown to be an effective treatment for idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH); however over time, some patients develop treatment failure with formation of a juxta-stent stenosis and a new pressure gradient. Repeat stenting can be performed in these patients to alleviate the stenosis and relieve the elevated pressures preventing complications such as blindness. The efficacy and long-term outcomes of re-stenting is not well described in the literature.MethodsA retrospective review of patients treated at our institution for IIH with VSS over a span of 18 years identified 18 patients who underwent re-stenting for treatment failure. Clinical features, outcomes and venographic data were collated for each patient with a follow-up period ranging from 12 months up to 9 years from their second stent.ResultsThe mean time to repeat stenting was 4 years and 12 months with a range of 1 month up to 16 years and 9 months. Four patients (22.2%) were asymptomatic following second stenting and three patients had recurrent papilledema. Two of these patients (11.1%) had surgical shunting and 1 patient (5.56%) received a third stent. 13 patients (72.2%) had ongoing headaches. There were no major complications in any patient.ConclusionsThis case series demonstrates favourable outcomes for repeat VSS in patients who develop juxta-stent stenosis with a pressure gradient after initial stenting for IIH. A proportion of patients have persistent headache likely due to other mechanisms and a minority may require surgical shunting or further stenting.</p>","PeriodicalId":49174,"journal":{"name":"Interventional Neuroradiology","volume":" ","pages":"15910199251332396"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interventional Neuroradiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15910199251332396","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundDural venous sinus stenting (VSS) has been shown to be an effective treatment for idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH); however over time, some patients develop treatment failure with formation of a juxta-stent stenosis and a new pressure gradient. Repeat stenting can be performed in these patients to alleviate the stenosis and relieve the elevated pressures preventing complications such as blindness. The efficacy and long-term outcomes of re-stenting is not well described in the literature.MethodsA retrospective review of patients treated at our institution for IIH with VSS over a span of 18 years identified 18 patients who underwent re-stenting for treatment failure. Clinical features, outcomes and venographic data were collated for each patient with a follow-up period ranging from 12 months up to 9 years from their second stent.ResultsThe mean time to repeat stenting was 4 years and 12 months with a range of 1 month up to 16 years and 9 months. Four patients (22.2%) were asymptomatic following second stenting and three patients had recurrent papilledema. Two of these patients (11.1%) had surgical shunting and 1 patient (5.56%) received a third stent. 13 patients (72.2%) had ongoing headaches. There were no major complications in any patient.ConclusionsThis case series demonstrates favourable outcomes for repeat VSS in patients who develop juxta-stent stenosis with a pressure gradient after initial stenting for IIH. A proportion of patients have persistent headache likely due to other mechanisms and a minority may require surgical shunting or further stenting.

重复静脉窦支架置入术治疗特发性颅内高压复发性窦狭窄相关治疗失败:一个病例系列。
硬脑膜静脉窦支架植入术(VSS)已被证明是治疗特发性颅内高压(IIH)的有效方法;然而,随着时间的推移,一些患者因支架旁狭窄和新的压力梯度的形成而出现治疗失败。这些患者可以进行重复支架置入,以缓解狭窄和缓解血压升高,防止失明等并发症。重新支架置入的疗效和长期结果在文献中没有很好的描述。方法对我院18年来治疗IIH合并VSS的患者进行回顾性分析,确定了18例因治疗失败而再次接受支架置入的患者。对每位患者的临床特征、结果和静脉造影数据进行整理,随访时间从第二次支架置入后的12个月到9年不等。结果平均重复支架时间为4年12个月,范围从1个月到16年9个月不等。4例(22.2%)患者在第二次支架植入后无症状,3例复发性乳头水肿。其中2例(11.1%)接受了手术分流,1例(5.56%)接受了第三次支架。13例(72.2%)患者持续头痛。所有患者均无重大并发症。结论:该病例系列表明,在IIH初始支架置入后并发压力梯度的近支架狭窄患者中,重复VSS的预后良好。一部分患者可能由于其他机制而出现持续性头痛,少数患者可能需要手术分流或进一步支架置入。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Interventional Neuroradiology
Interventional Neuroradiology CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
11.80%
发文量
192
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Interventional Neuroradiology (INR) is a peer-reviewed clinical practice journal documenting the current state of interventional neuroradiology worldwide. INR publishes original clinical observations, descriptions of new techniques or procedures, case reports, and articles on the ethical and social aspects of related health care. Original research published in INR is related to the practice of interventional neuroradiology...
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信