Localization and Psychometrics of the "Good/Bad Touch Questionnaire (GBT)" in Preschool Children: Persian Version.

IF 1.7 Q2 FAMILY STUDIES
Journal of Child & Adolescent Trauma Pub Date : 2025-02-05 eCollection Date: 2025-06-01 DOI:10.1007/s40653-025-00689-y
Elham Sahraei Heroabad, Firoozeh Asadzadeh, Amirhossein Maghari, Nasrin Homayounfar, Leila Reisy
{"title":"Localization and Psychometrics of the \"Good/Bad Touch Questionnaire (GBT)\" in Preschool Children: Persian Version.","authors":"Elham Sahraei Heroabad, Firoozeh Asadzadeh, Amirhossein Maghari, Nasrin Homayounfar, Leila Reisy","doi":"10.1007/s40653-025-00689-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Childhood, often associated with various forms of harassment, requires a tool to assess children's ability to recognize abuse. This study was conducted with the aim of localizing and evaluating the psychometrics of the Good/Bad Touch Questionnaire (GBT) in preschool children. This study conducted as a cross-sectional design, utilizing the multi-stage sampling method to select 82 preschool children from Ardabil city in the year 2023. Data collection was conducted using the GBT questionnaire. Initially, the questionnaire underwent translation, and for each question, individual calculations were made for the Content Validity Index (CVI) and Content Validity Ratio (CVR). The reliability of the questionnaire was assessed through internal and external consistency methods, in addition to the retest method, employing the Kuder-Richardson index (KR-21). The study participants had an average age of 5.74 ± 0.42 years. The CVR index exceeded the minimum acceptable level, as per Lawshe Table (0.42). The overall CVI index reached 0.901, surpassing the minimum acceptable value (0.79), indicating the appropriateness of the questions' content. Moreover, the entire questionnaire demonstrated reliability (<i>r</i> = 0.256, <i>P</i> = 0.151), and the Cod Richardson 21 coefficient at the study's onset and conclusion were 0.726 and 0.844, respectively. The results of the present study indicate that the GBT questionnaire, meeting the minimum acceptable value of CVR and yielding favorable results in the CVI index, is a valid and reliable tool for assessing children's ability to recognize inappropriate touches. The confirmation of both quantitative and qualitative content validity, along with form validity and questionnaire reliability, strengthens the robustness of the tool in its intended purpose.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40653-025-00689-y.</p>","PeriodicalId":44763,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Child & Adolescent Trauma","volume":"18 2","pages":"439-446"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12130379/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Child & Adolescent Trauma","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40653-025-00689-y","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Childhood, often associated with various forms of harassment, requires a tool to assess children's ability to recognize abuse. This study was conducted with the aim of localizing and evaluating the psychometrics of the Good/Bad Touch Questionnaire (GBT) in preschool children. This study conducted as a cross-sectional design, utilizing the multi-stage sampling method to select 82 preschool children from Ardabil city in the year 2023. Data collection was conducted using the GBT questionnaire. Initially, the questionnaire underwent translation, and for each question, individual calculations were made for the Content Validity Index (CVI) and Content Validity Ratio (CVR). The reliability of the questionnaire was assessed through internal and external consistency methods, in addition to the retest method, employing the Kuder-Richardson index (KR-21). The study participants had an average age of 5.74 ± 0.42 years. The CVR index exceeded the minimum acceptable level, as per Lawshe Table (0.42). The overall CVI index reached 0.901, surpassing the minimum acceptable value (0.79), indicating the appropriateness of the questions' content. Moreover, the entire questionnaire demonstrated reliability (r = 0.256, P = 0.151), and the Cod Richardson 21 coefficient at the study's onset and conclusion were 0.726 and 0.844, respectively. The results of the present study indicate that the GBT questionnaire, meeting the minimum acceptable value of CVR and yielding favorable results in the CVI index, is a valid and reliable tool for assessing children's ability to recognize inappropriate touches. The confirmation of both quantitative and qualitative content validity, along with form validity and questionnaire reliability, strengthens the robustness of the tool in its intended purpose.

Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40653-025-00689-y.

学龄前儿童“好/坏触摸问卷”(GBT)的定位与心理测量学:波斯语版。
儿童时期常常与各种形式的骚扰联系在一起,因此需要一种工具来评估儿童识别虐待的能力。本研究的目的是定位和评估学龄前儿童良好/坏触摸问卷(GBT)的心理测量学。本研究采用横断面设计,采用多阶段抽样方法,选取2023年阿达比尔市82名学龄前儿童。数据收集采用GBT问卷。首先对问卷进行翻译,并对每个问题分别计算内容效度指数(CVI)和内容效度比(CVR)。问卷的信度除采用重测法外,采用库德-理查德森指数(kder - richardson index, KR-21),通过内部一致性法和外部一致性法进行评估。研究参与者的平均年龄为5.74±0.42岁。根据Lawshe表,CVR指数超过了最低可接受水平(0.42)。总体CVI指数达到0.901,超过了最低可接受值0.79,说明问题内容的适当性。整个问卷具有良好的信度(r = 0.256, P = 0.151),研究开始时的Cod Richardson 21系数为0.726,研究结束时的Cod Richardson 21系数为0.844。本研究结果表明,GBT问卷满足CVR的最小可接受值,CVI指数结果良好,是评估儿童识别不适当触摸能力的有效可靠工具。定量和定性内容效度的确认,以及形式效度和问卷信度的确认,加强了工具在其预期目的中的稳健性。补充信息:在线版本包含补充资料,提供地址:10.1007/s40653-025-00689-y。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
6.70%
发文量
71
期刊介绍: Underpinned by a biopsychosocial approach, the Journal of Child & Adolescent Trauma presents original research and prevention and treatment strategies for understanding and dealing with symptoms and disorders related to the psychological effects of trauma experienced by children and adolescents during childhood and where the impact of these experiences continues into adulthood. The journal also examines intervention models directed toward the individual, family, and community, new theoretical models and approaches, and public policy proposals and innovations. In addition, the journal promotes rigorous investigation and debate on the human capacity for agency, resilience and longer-term healing in the face of child and adolescent trauma. With a multidisciplinary approach that draws input from the psychological, medical, social work, sociological, public health, legal and education fields, the journal features research, intervention approaches and evidence-based programs, theoretical articles, specific review articles, brief reports and case studies, and commentaries on current and/or controversial topics. The journal also encourages submissions from less heard voices, for example in terms of geography, minority status or service user perspectives. Among the topics examined in the Journal of Child & Adolescent Trauma: The effects of childhood maltreatment Loss, natural disasters, and political conflict Exposure to or victimization from family or community violence Racial, ethnic, gender, sexual orientation or class discrimination Physical injury, diseases, and painful or debilitating medical treatments The impact of poverty, social deprivation and inequality Barriers and facilitators on pathways to recovery The Journal of Child & Adolescent Trauma is an important resource for practitioners, policymakers, researchers, and academics whose work is centered on children exposed to traumatic events and adults exposed to traumatic events as children.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信