{"title":"Localization and Psychometrics of the \"Good/Bad Touch Questionnaire (GBT)\" in Preschool Children: Persian Version.","authors":"Elham Sahraei Heroabad, Firoozeh Asadzadeh, Amirhossein Maghari, Nasrin Homayounfar, Leila Reisy","doi":"10.1007/s40653-025-00689-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Childhood, often associated with various forms of harassment, requires a tool to assess children's ability to recognize abuse. This study was conducted with the aim of localizing and evaluating the psychometrics of the Good/Bad Touch Questionnaire (GBT) in preschool children. This study conducted as a cross-sectional design, utilizing the multi-stage sampling method to select 82 preschool children from Ardabil city in the year 2023. Data collection was conducted using the GBT questionnaire. Initially, the questionnaire underwent translation, and for each question, individual calculations were made for the Content Validity Index (CVI) and Content Validity Ratio (CVR). The reliability of the questionnaire was assessed through internal and external consistency methods, in addition to the retest method, employing the Kuder-Richardson index (KR-21). The study participants had an average age of 5.74 ± 0.42 years. The CVR index exceeded the minimum acceptable level, as per Lawshe Table (0.42). The overall CVI index reached 0.901, surpassing the minimum acceptable value (0.79), indicating the appropriateness of the questions' content. Moreover, the entire questionnaire demonstrated reliability (<i>r</i> = 0.256, <i>P</i> = 0.151), and the Cod Richardson 21 coefficient at the study's onset and conclusion were 0.726 and 0.844, respectively. The results of the present study indicate that the GBT questionnaire, meeting the minimum acceptable value of CVR and yielding favorable results in the CVI index, is a valid and reliable tool for assessing children's ability to recognize inappropriate touches. The confirmation of both quantitative and qualitative content validity, along with form validity and questionnaire reliability, strengthens the robustness of the tool in its intended purpose.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40653-025-00689-y.</p>","PeriodicalId":44763,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Child & Adolescent Trauma","volume":"18 2","pages":"439-446"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12130379/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Child & Adolescent Trauma","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40653-025-00689-y","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Childhood, often associated with various forms of harassment, requires a tool to assess children's ability to recognize abuse. This study was conducted with the aim of localizing and evaluating the psychometrics of the Good/Bad Touch Questionnaire (GBT) in preschool children. This study conducted as a cross-sectional design, utilizing the multi-stage sampling method to select 82 preschool children from Ardabil city in the year 2023. Data collection was conducted using the GBT questionnaire. Initially, the questionnaire underwent translation, and for each question, individual calculations were made for the Content Validity Index (CVI) and Content Validity Ratio (CVR). The reliability of the questionnaire was assessed through internal and external consistency methods, in addition to the retest method, employing the Kuder-Richardson index (KR-21). The study participants had an average age of 5.74 ± 0.42 years. The CVR index exceeded the minimum acceptable level, as per Lawshe Table (0.42). The overall CVI index reached 0.901, surpassing the minimum acceptable value (0.79), indicating the appropriateness of the questions' content. Moreover, the entire questionnaire demonstrated reliability (r = 0.256, P = 0.151), and the Cod Richardson 21 coefficient at the study's onset and conclusion were 0.726 and 0.844, respectively. The results of the present study indicate that the GBT questionnaire, meeting the minimum acceptable value of CVR and yielding favorable results in the CVI index, is a valid and reliable tool for assessing children's ability to recognize inappropriate touches. The confirmation of both quantitative and qualitative content validity, along with form validity and questionnaire reliability, strengthens the robustness of the tool in its intended purpose.
Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40653-025-00689-y.
期刊介绍:
Underpinned by a biopsychosocial approach, the Journal of Child & Adolescent Trauma presents original research and prevention and treatment strategies for understanding and dealing with symptoms and disorders related to the psychological effects of trauma experienced by children and adolescents during childhood and where the impact of these experiences continues into adulthood. The journal also examines intervention models directed toward the individual, family, and community, new theoretical models and approaches, and public policy proposals and innovations. In addition, the journal promotes rigorous investigation and debate on the human capacity for agency, resilience and longer-term healing in the face of child and adolescent trauma. With a multidisciplinary approach that draws input from the psychological, medical, social work, sociological, public health, legal and education fields, the journal features research, intervention approaches and evidence-based programs, theoretical articles, specific review articles, brief reports and case studies, and commentaries on current and/or controversial topics. The journal also encourages submissions from less heard voices, for example in terms of geography, minority status or service user perspectives.
Among the topics examined in the Journal of Child & Adolescent Trauma:
The effects of childhood maltreatment
Loss, natural disasters, and political conflict
Exposure to or victimization from family or community violence
Racial, ethnic, gender, sexual orientation or class discrimination
Physical injury, diseases, and painful or debilitating medical treatments
The impact of poverty, social deprivation and inequality
Barriers and facilitators on pathways to recovery
The Journal of Child & Adolescent Trauma is an important resource for practitioners, policymakers, researchers, and academics whose work is centered on children exposed to traumatic events and adults exposed to traumatic events as children.