Approaches to Assessment and Intervention with Children and Young People who have Experienced Child Sexual Abuse: A Review of Reviews.

IF 2 Q2 FAMILY STUDIES
Journal of Child & Adolescent Trauma Pub Date : 2025-03-29 eCollection Date: 2025-06-01 DOI:10.1007/s40653-025-00702-4
Lynne McPherson, Kathomi Gatwiri, Meaghan Vosz, Noel MacNamara, Janise Mitchell, Joe Tucci
{"title":"Approaches to Assessment and Intervention with Children and Young People who have Experienced Child Sexual Abuse: A Review of Reviews.","authors":"Lynne McPherson, Kathomi Gatwiri, Meaghan Vosz, Noel MacNamara, Janise Mitchell, Joe Tucci","doi":"10.1007/s40653-025-00702-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This paper focuses on understandings of Child Sexual Abuse (CSA) and best practice approaches in practice contexts to assessment and intervention with children who have experienced abuse. By collating data from existing reviews of literature or scoping reviews to formulate one overarching systematic scoping review, we provide a knowledge synthesis of practices in assessment and interventions into CSA. Utilising a two-phase scoping review method, the screening process resulted in twenty-two reviews for inclusion in this review. As a result of the analysis process, findings were identified across three broad themes: i) the limitations of current knowledge and official data about CSA and low rates of CSA prosecutions; ii) best practice in assessment and intervention; and iii) critical gaps in knowledge on CSA from diverse communities and those experiencing intersectional disadvantage. We conclude that whilst knowledge on CSA is continually emerging, there is limited consensus and significant challenges in the disclosure processes; poor skills in sensitive assessment and limited evidence about systemic responses, including low prosecution rates and poor integration of knowledge into practice; and promising interventions. There is also a critical gap in knowledge about CSA within racially and culturally minoritised groups, and other communities that report intersectional marginalisation.</p>","PeriodicalId":44763,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Child & Adolescent Trauma","volume":"18 2","pages":"279-291"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12130397/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Child & Adolescent Trauma","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40653-025-00702-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper focuses on understandings of Child Sexual Abuse (CSA) and best practice approaches in practice contexts to assessment and intervention with children who have experienced abuse. By collating data from existing reviews of literature or scoping reviews to formulate one overarching systematic scoping review, we provide a knowledge synthesis of practices in assessment and interventions into CSA. Utilising a two-phase scoping review method, the screening process resulted in twenty-two reviews for inclusion in this review. As a result of the analysis process, findings were identified across three broad themes: i) the limitations of current knowledge and official data about CSA and low rates of CSA prosecutions; ii) best practice in assessment and intervention; and iii) critical gaps in knowledge on CSA from diverse communities and those experiencing intersectional disadvantage. We conclude that whilst knowledge on CSA is continually emerging, there is limited consensus and significant challenges in the disclosure processes; poor skills in sensitive assessment and limited evidence about systemic responses, including low prosecution rates and poor integration of knowledge into practice; and promising interventions. There is also a critical gap in knowledge about CSA within racially and culturally minoritised groups, and other communities that report intersectional marginalisation.

对经历过儿童性虐待的儿童和青少年的评估和干预方法:综述。
本文的重点是对儿童性虐待(CSA)的理解和在实践背景下评估和干预遭受虐待儿童的最佳实践方法。通过整理来自现有文献综述或范围综述的数据,以制定一个总体系统的范围综述,我们提供了评估和干预CSA的实践知识综合。利用两阶段范围审查方法,筛选过程产生了22个纳入本审查的审查。作为分析过程的结果,在三个广泛的主题中确定了调查结果:i)目前关于CSA的知识和官方数据的局限性以及CSA起诉率低;Ii)评估和干预的最佳做法;以及iii)来自不同社区和处于交叉劣势的社区的CSA知识存在重大差距。我们的结论是,虽然关于CSA的知识不断涌现,但在披露过程中存在有限的共识和重大挑战;敏感评估技能差,关于系统反应的证据有限,包括起诉率低,知识与实践的结合差;以及有希望的干预措施。在种族和文化上的少数群体以及其他报告交叉边缘化的社区中,关于CSA的知识也存在严重差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
6.70%
发文量
71
期刊介绍: Underpinned by a biopsychosocial approach, the Journal of Child & Adolescent Trauma presents original research and prevention and treatment strategies for understanding and dealing with symptoms and disorders related to the psychological effects of trauma experienced by children and adolescents during childhood and where the impact of these experiences continues into adulthood. The journal also examines intervention models directed toward the individual, family, and community, new theoretical models and approaches, and public policy proposals and innovations. In addition, the journal promotes rigorous investigation and debate on the human capacity for agency, resilience and longer-term healing in the face of child and adolescent trauma. With a multidisciplinary approach that draws input from the psychological, medical, social work, sociological, public health, legal and education fields, the journal features research, intervention approaches and evidence-based programs, theoretical articles, specific review articles, brief reports and case studies, and commentaries on current and/or controversial topics. The journal also encourages submissions from less heard voices, for example in terms of geography, minority status or service user perspectives. Among the topics examined in the Journal of Child & Adolescent Trauma: The effects of childhood maltreatment Loss, natural disasters, and political conflict Exposure to or victimization from family or community violence Racial, ethnic, gender, sexual orientation or class discrimination Physical injury, diseases, and painful or debilitating medical treatments The impact of poverty, social deprivation and inequality Barriers and facilitators on pathways to recovery The Journal of Child & Adolescent Trauma is an important resource for practitioners, policymakers, researchers, and academics whose work is centered on children exposed to traumatic events and adults exposed to traumatic events as children.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信