Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the clinical performance of medical students: a retrospective study in Korea.

Korean journal of medical education Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-29 DOI:10.3946/kjme.2025.331
Jihye Yu, Sukyung Lee, Janghoon Lee, Inwhee Park
{"title":"Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the clinical performance of medical students: a retrospective study in Korea.","authors":"Jihye Yu, Sukyung Lee, Janghoon Lee, Inwhee Park","doi":"10.3946/kjme.2025.331","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The COVID-19 (coronavirus disease 2019) pandemic led to significant changes in clinical clerkships, including reduced ward rounds. We aimed to determine how the pandemic-induced changes in the clinical practice environment affect the clinical performance of medical students.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed objective structured clinical examination scores of third- and fourth-year medical students from 2019-2020 and 2020-2021 across six stations by the Seoul-Gyeonggi Consortium. Clinical, communication, and ability scores were measured and analyzed using repeated-measures multivariate analysis of variance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The interaction between clinical practice progress and pandemic-induced changes significantly affected physical examination and medical history scores, though the differences were not substantial. Patient-physician interaction significance varied by measurement period. Clinical communication ability also showed significant differences based on the measurement period and practical experience.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>During the pandemic, alternative learning methods, including self-learning, simulation/practice, and peer role-play, helped improve medical competency in areas such as history-taking and physical examination. However, these were less effective in improving patient-physician interactions or clinical communication efficacy. Alternative learning methods have limitations, and they cannot replace direct patient encounters in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":37737,"journal":{"name":"Korean journal of medical education","volume":"37 2","pages":"143-152"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean journal of medical education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3946/kjme.2025.331","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The COVID-19 (coronavirus disease 2019) pandemic led to significant changes in clinical clerkships, including reduced ward rounds. We aimed to determine how the pandemic-induced changes in the clinical practice environment affect the clinical performance of medical students.

Methods: We analyzed objective structured clinical examination scores of third- and fourth-year medical students from 2019-2020 and 2020-2021 across six stations by the Seoul-Gyeonggi Consortium. Clinical, communication, and ability scores were measured and analyzed using repeated-measures multivariate analysis of variance.

Results: The interaction between clinical practice progress and pandemic-induced changes significantly affected physical examination and medical history scores, though the differences were not substantial. Patient-physician interaction significance varied by measurement period. Clinical communication ability also showed significant differences based on the measurement period and practical experience.

Conclusion: During the pandemic, alternative learning methods, including self-learning, simulation/practice, and peer role-play, helped improve medical competency in areas such as history-taking and physical examination. However, these were less effective in improving patient-physician interactions or clinical communication efficacy. Alternative learning methods have limitations, and they cannot replace direct patient encounters in clinical practice.

COVID-19大流行对韩国医学生临床表现的影响:一项回顾性研究
目的:2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行导致临床办事员发生重大变化,包括查房次数减少。我们的目的是确定大流行引起的临床实践环境的变化如何影响医学生的临床表现。方法:我们分析了首尔-京畿道财团在2019-2020年和2020-2021年六个站点的三年级和四年级医学生的客观结构化临床检查成绩。临床、沟通和能力得分采用重复测量多变量方差分析进行测量和分析。结果:临床实践进展与流行病学变化的交互作用显著影响体格检查和病史评分,但差异不显著。医患互动的显著性随测量期的不同而不同。临床沟通能力也因测量时间和实践经验的不同而有显著差异。结论:大流行期间,自主学习、模拟/实践、同伴角色扮演等替代学习方法有助于提高学生在记录病史、体格检查等方面的医疗能力。然而,这些在改善医患互动或临床沟通效能方面效果较差。替代学习方法有局限性,不能代替临床实践中与患者的直接接触。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Korean journal of medical education
Korean journal of medical education Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
期刊介绍: The journal seeks to provide theoretical foundations, practical analysis, and up-to-date developments in health professional education: Curriculum development Teaching and learning Student assessment Educational evaluation Educational management and policy The journal welcomes high-quality papers on all levels of health professional education, including: Undergraduate education Postgraduate training Continuous professional development Interprofessional education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信