Multiple dimensions of uncertainty in fertility goals: recent trends and patterns in the United States.

IF 2.1 Q2 DEMOGRAPHY
Genus Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-06-02 DOI:10.1186/s41118-025-00251-6
Luca Badolato, Sarah R Hayford, Karen Benjamin Guzzo
{"title":"Multiple dimensions of uncertainty in fertility goals: recent trends and patterns in the United States.","authors":"Luca Badolato, Sarah R Hayford, Karen Benjamin Guzzo","doi":"10.1186/s41118-025-00251-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A growing body of fertility research focuses on uncertainty as a key contributor to fertility decision making and behaviors. In this paper, we identify and describe multiple components of uncertainty in fertility goals that, when analyzed together and in relation to macro-level trends, provide critical insight into fertility dynamics. Drawing from multiple streams of research on fertility goals and behaviors, we focus on (i) <i>goal uncertainty</i>, (ii) <i>realization uncertainty</i>, and (iii) <i>intensity of goals</i>. We use data from the National Survey of Family Growth (NSFG) 2002-2019 to estimate trends and patterns of these three dimensions of uncertainty in fertility goals, with a focus on variation across the life course and inequality by education and income. We link uncertainty in fertility goals with the quantum and timing of fertility intentions among U.S. women. The results show that realization uncertainty is pervasive, with up to 50% of women who intend children being uncertain whether they will actually follow through with those intentions, and intensity of intentions is low, with up to 25% of childless women who intend children saying that they would not be bothered if they did not have a child. Although goal uncertainty is overall stable across the study period, young and childless women show increasing realization uncertainty over time and hold their positive intentions less intensely. More socioeconomically advantaged women exhibit higher realization certainty and greater intensity of their goals. Women who are more certain of realizing their positive intentions and those who hold them more intensely report a higher number of additional intended children and a shorter time frame for future childbearing. We conclude by situating these findings in a broader climate of increasing uncertainty.</p>","PeriodicalId":35741,"journal":{"name":"Genus","volume":"81 1","pages":"14"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12130082/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Genus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41118-025-00251-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DEMOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A growing body of fertility research focuses on uncertainty as a key contributor to fertility decision making and behaviors. In this paper, we identify and describe multiple components of uncertainty in fertility goals that, when analyzed together and in relation to macro-level trends, provide critical insight into fertility dynamics. Drawing from multiple streams of research on fertility goals and behaviors, we focus on (i) goal uncertainty, (ii) realization uncertainty, and (iii) intensity of goals. We use data from the National Survey of Family Growth (NSFG) 2002-2019 to estimate trends and patterns of these three dimensions of uncertainty in fertility goals, with a focus on variation across the life course and inequality by education and income. We link uncertainty in fertility goals with the quantum and timing of fertility intentions among U.S. women. The results show that realization uncertainty is pervasive, with up to 50% of women who intend children being uncertain whether they will actually follow through with those intentions, and intensity of intentions is low, with up to 25% of childless women who intend children saying that they would not be bothered if they did not have a child. Although goal uncertainty is overall stable across the study period, young and childless women show increasing realization uncertainty over time and hold their positive intentions less intensely. More socioeconomically advantaged women exhibit higher realization certainty and greater intensity of their goals. Women who are more certain of realizing their positive intentions and those who hold them more intensely report a higher number of additional intended children and a shorter time frame for future childbearing. We conclude by situating these findings in a broader climate of increasing uncertainty.

生育目标的多重不确定性:美国最近的趋势和模式。
越来越多的生育研究机构将不确定性作为生育决策和行为的关键因素。在本文中,我们识别并描述了生育率目标不确定性的多个组成部分,当将这些不确定性与宏观趋势相结合进行分析时,可以提供对生育率动态的关键见解。从生育目标和行为的多个研究流中,我们重点关注(1)目标的不确定性,(2)实现的不确定性,(3)目标的强度。我们使用2002-2019年全国家庭增长调查(NSFG)的数据来估计生育率目标中这三个不确定性维度的趋势和模式,重点关注整个生命过程中的变化以及教育和收入的不平等。我们将生育目标的不确定性与美国女性生育意图的数量和时间联系起来。结果显示,意识上的不确定性是普遍存在的,多达50%的想要孩子的女性不确定自己是否真的会按照自己的意愿去做,而且意愿的强度很低,多达25%的想要孩子的没有孩子的女性表示,如果没有孩子,她们不会感到困扰。尽管目标不确定性在整个研究期间总体稳定,但随着时间的推移,年轻和无子女的女性表现出越来越多的实现不确定性,并且积极意图的强烈程度有所降低。社会经济地位较高的妇女表现出更高的实现确定性和更高的目标强度。那些更确定实现自己积极意图的女性和那些更强烈地抱有积极意图的女性报告说,她们想要的额外孩子数量更多,未来生育的时间框架更短。最后,我们将这些发现置于不确定性增加的更广泛的环境中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Genus
Genus Social Sciences-Demography
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
33
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信